Tony Richardson...

aturnis · 12-03-2007, 04:56 PM

I knew when Herm got rid of him, it was a mistake. Even in his old age and decline he is still better than any option we have.

I understand we are "trying to get younger", but what is the harm in having an older guy fill a spot, better than a TE or LB could do, until you can find a sufficient backup?

Now T-Rich is blocking for the #1 RB in the NFL. I realize Adrian Peterson can make anyone look good (Really wanted to trade Larry and get him, even with all the "?'s" that surrounded him), but still doing a good job, and could have even taught the TE or LB a thing or two.

So why did they come to the stupid decision to let him go?

12-03-2007, 04:56 PM	Topic Starter
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	Tony Richardson... I knew when Herm got rid of him, it was a mistake. Even in his old age and decline he is still better than any option we have. I understand we are "trying to get younger", but what is the harm in having an older guy fill a spot, better than a TE or LB could do, until you can find a sufficient backup? Now T-Rich is blocking for the #1 RB in the NFL. I realize Adrian Peterson can make anyone look good (Really wanted to trade Larry and get him, even with all the "?'s" that surrounded him), but still doing a good job, and could have even taught the TE or LB a thing or two. So why did they come to the stupid decision to let him go?
Posts: 13,873