*** Official Royals Repository, Part 3 ***

[duncan_idaho]

In this thread: All things related to the AL Champions.

Duncan's Official Team Record prediction: 90 wins
One month in: Looking strong
All Star Break: Looking strong, probably should adjust up to 93-94 wins.
Duncan's Official Team MVP prediction: Eric Hosmer
One month in: Upstaged by his best friend MIKE MOOTACOS, MAN. Tell us bout your hittin, bro!
All Star Break: Lorenzo Cain starting to run away with this one.

Division Preview
Clearly, overlooking the Twins was a mistake at this point. I still don't believe in that team long-term, but they're starting to get that Magic Season twinkle about them.

Detroit is toast. Garbage rotation beyond Price and Sanchez, Miggy out.

And Cleveland... Cleveland still is dangerous if it ever clicks offensively, because the starting pitching is good enough for them to real off a 15-5 stretch and get right back into the playoff picture.

The Royals will be a division winner IF ...
1) Ventura and Duffy combine for 375+ innings of high-quality work
2) Eric Hosmer delivers on his potential with a FULL season of success rather than bursts
3) The deeper bullpen lessens the critical load on Herrera, Davis and Holland
4) Lorenzo Cain stays healthy
5) Either Alex Rios or Kendrys Morales bounces back to 2013 form

The first of these is clearly not going to happen. The second looked good through the end of May but is now eating Cain's dust (Hosmer has still been improved this year, though, lessening his valley. If he has a really hot second half, he can get right back in it). Item three is definitely the case. Item four should probably be first at this point. And Morales has more than bounced back.

Duncan’s Top 20 for mid-season 2015:

Spoiler!

1. Raul Adalberto Mondesi, SS, BOTH: Tools, tools, tools. RA has tools galore. At his best, he’s an All-Star SS who plays elite D, hits 15-20 HR, swipes 40 bags, and is an ideal 1, 2 or 3 hitter. At his worst, I think he looks a lot like Alcides Escobar. Plate discipline is his biggest challenge at this point, but evaluators are confident that will come with time. Clear No. 1
2. Sean Manaea, LHP: I still believe in the upside here, even with the abbreviated start. 6-5 lefties with his combination of stuff and deception have the ability to pitch at the front of a rotation for a long time.
3. Kyle Zimmer, RHP: He’s pitching again and staying healthy, which is nice. He’s pitcing out of the bullpen to build back his arm strength, which is less nice. But still has that high upside, just a lower floor now. Ideally, the team will use him as a bullpen weapon in September (because he has earned it) and then give him a chance to transition back to starting for 2016.
4. Miguel Almonte, RHP: Still love the body, FB/CH combo. Results aren’t eye popping, but he’s still low enough and early enough in the development to prize those things over performance. Still a solid No. 3 starter upside, and just a year and some change away from potentially being ready to contribute at the MLB level.
5. Cody Reed, LHP: Reed has popped up this year, forcing an early promotion to Northwest Arkansas. His stuff is legit, with mid-90s heat and a wipeout slider. Control still needs work, but a promising young arm (that makes Almonte much more tradeable)
6. John Lamb, LHP: Lamb has had a career resurgence in 2015, putting him back on the prospect map. He’s dominating at AAA and will be in the rotation mix in 2016, unless he suffers another setback. Fastball is back, changeup is improving, still working on the ability to throw the slider and curve for strikes when down in the count.
7. Jorge Bonifacio, RF, RH: Emilio’s little brother got off to a horrible start in 2015 but has heated up as the season went on. He also is translating BP power to game power for the first time, with 15 HR just past the mid-way point of his season. Despite his disappointing 2014, he has a chance to build his way back into legit prospect status – and still is only 22. Next challenge for him should be Omaha, but that may wait for the start of the 2014 season.
8. Scott Blewett, RHP: Blewett has a nice two –pitch mix already and is off to a strong start. With his size (6-6) and a good fastball/curveball combo, Blewett could eventually turn into a good No. 3 starter, with a MLB-average changeup.
9. Nolan Watson, RHP: The Royals’ 2015 sandwich pick is a polished prep arm who is adding velocity and explosiveness to a good, polished base. Likely to move quickly.
10. Ashe Russell, RHP: The 2015 top pick probably needs more work than Watson, but the upside is really nice. Again, advanced two-pitch mix that will depend on him adding a changeup. Could be a very good NO. 2 if it all adds up.

Spoiler!

11. Bubba Starling, CF, RH: Starling has been up and down this year but put himself back on the map by greatly improving his K rate while also improving across the slash line as a hitter. His defense and baserunning are MLB ready; if Starling can work himself into a league average hitter, he can be a solid MLB regular who plays great D in CF while hitting 15 HR and swiping 20 bags.
12. Balbino Fuenmayor, 1B/DH, RH: The Balbino came out of basically nowhere in 2015 to earn a Futures Game spot. Big power and an improved two-strike approach have turned the late bloomer into a legit prospect. He’s blocked at the MLB level currently by Eric Hosmer and Kendrys Morales, but Fuenmayor’s combination of power hitting and good average/strike zone control makes him intriguing.
13. Cheslor Cuthbert, 3B, RH: Cheslor probably is not going to be the star KC was hoping for when signing him out of Nicaragua, but he does look like he can be a solid reserve for an MLB club. Good defense at 3B paired with a solid plate approach and some gap power plays fine off the bench. He becomes a lot more interesting if they think he can stick as a 2B, which they have experimented with.
14. Chase Vallot, C/DH/1B: I really like Vallot’s power and plate discipline combo. His bat will probably force him from behind the plate, but he’s held his own despite being extremely young for every level he has faced.
15. Alfredo Escalera-Maldonado, OF, RH: Escalera-Maldonado earned a promotion to Wilmington at age 20, which is pretty advanced movement for that age. He’s an athletic outfielder who has shown some plate discipline at an early age, which is encouraging. Doesn’t sound like he can stick in CF long term for KC, but his bat has become one to watch.
16. Pedro Fernandez, RHP: I haven’t seen much of him, but like the reports I’ve heard on his fastball and general makeup. Could become the next Almonte/Mondesi, though he’s more likely to land in the pen than either of them.
17. Elier Hernandez, OF, RH: Elier Hernanez teamed with Escalera-Maldonado in breaking out at Low-A and earning a promotion to Wilmington. It’s still early for this guy – he is just 20 years old – but he doesn’t take walks and hasn’t developed the prodigious power many thought he had the potential for. Still worth watching.
18. Hunter Dozier, 3B, RH: Dozier is reworking his swing mid-season, which generally will cause production to do what his has done: Nose dive. The changes he made entering the season (seemingly geared towards increasing his power production) were a disaster, and now he’s trying to get back to what he used to be. Still looks great and checks most of the scouting boxes, but the performance hasn’t matched, and it almost knocked him out of the list.
19. Christian Binford, RHP: After a breakthrough 2014, Binford struggled mightily at AAA and suffered a demotion. His upside remains similar – a back-end starter who can eat innings – but Binford’s lack of velocity and reliance on command have caught up to him so far.
20. Marten Gasparini, OF, SH: Gasparini is intriguing because of his speed and athleticism. He’s a LOOOOONG ways from the majors and young for his level, but reports on his bat speed, swing, and speed remain positive enough to keep him on the bubble.

[Anyong Bluth]

Are we maybe a bit too obsessed about how long our starting rotation goes in games?

I'm not saying that it should be ignored or that it would be wise to do something to get another arm in there that can pitch well as well as chew up innings to keep the pen options flexible.

It just seems like this has been a point every time how good the Royals are has been discussed.
We have an unreal stable of very reliable middle relief and door slamming pitchers in our pen. Who is used with any regularity that makes you nervous if they are called upon?
My only concern is making sure that they aren't gassed come September and October.

That said, Greinke leads all of baseball for games pitched and going at least 7 innings, with 10.
There's just not nearly as many guys chalking up extended appearances.

Besides, we went against the grain in how we handle our bullpen with huge success. Why try forcing the issue when our roster is uniquely built to succeed in spite of unorthodox methods.

I'm more interested in finding a legit arm that can dominate for 5 or 6 every time out, than I am about finding somebody who can just keep you in the game if the offense is clicking and go 7 or 8 innings.

Maybe I'm wrong, and this is some red flag for down the stretch?

[BigCatDaddy]

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth

Are we maybe a bit too obsessed about how long our starting rotation goes in games?

I'm not saying that it should be ignored or that it would be wise to do something to get another arm in there that can pitch well as well as chew up innings to keep the pen options flexible.

It just seems like this has been a point every time how good the Royals are has been discussed.
We have an unreal stable of very reliable middle relief and door slamming pitchers in our pen. Who is used with any regularity that makes you nervous if they are called upon?
My only concern is making sure that they aren't gassed come September and October.

That said, Greinke leads all of baseball for games pitched and going at least 7 innings, with 10.
There's just not nearly as many guys chalking up extended appearances.

Besides, we went against the grain in how we handle our bullpen with huge success. Why try forcing the issue when our roster is uniquely built to succeed in spite of unorthodox methods.

I'm more interested in finding a legit arm that can dominate for 5 or 6 every time out, than I am about finding somebody who can just keep you in the game if the offense is clicking and go 7 or 8 innings.

Maybe I'm wrong, and this is some red flag for down the stretch?

Bruce Chen, come on down!!

[mr. tegu]

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth

Are we maybe a bit too obsessed about how long our starting rotation goes in games?

I'm not saying that it should be ignored or that it would be wise to do something to get another arm in there that can pitch well as well as chew up innings to keep the pen options flexible.

It just seems like this has been a point every time how good the Royals are has been discussed.
We have an unreal stable of very reliable middle relief and door slamming pitchers in our pen. Who is used with any regularity that makes you nervous if they are called upon?

I expressed similar sentiments a few days ago when discussing Duffy for Cueto. Cueto may be more reliable to go an extra inning or so, but with our pen, it doesn't really matter because we want teams to face our bullpen. That was why I didn't think losing Duffy was worth the very minimal gain. That trade stuff seems to all be a moot point though since Duffy has come back strong. But the bullpen point remains.

[Lex Luthor]

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth

Are we maybe a bit too obsessed about how long our starting rotation goes in games?

I'm not saying that it should be ignored or that it would be wise to do something to get another arm in there that can pitch well as well as chew up innings to keep the pen options flexible.

It just seems like this has been a point every time how good the Royals are has been discussed.
We have an unreal stable of very reliable middle relief and door slamming pitchers in our pen. Who is used with any regularity that makes you nervous if they are called upon?
My only concern is making sure that they aren't gassed come September and October.

That said, Greinke leads all of baseball for games pitched and going at least 7 innings, with 10.
There's just not nearly as many guys chalking up extended appearances.

Besides, we went against the grain in how we handle our bullpen with huge success. Why try forcing the issue when our roster is uniquely built to succeed in spite of unorthodox methods.

I'm more interested in finding a legit arm that can dominate for 5 or 6 every time out, than I am about finding somebody who can just keep you in the game if the offense is clicking and go 7 or 8 innings.

Maybe I'm wrong, and this is some red flag for down the stretch?

I tend to agree with you, yesterday being a perfect example of how a bullpen can make up for a starting pitcher who doesn't pitch deep into a game. Our bullpen beat the Pirates' ace.



.

[alnorth]

Welp, MLB just had their competitive balance lottery and we completely lost out.

15 teams were eligible for 12 picks (6 after round 1 and 6 after round 2) Even though we went to the World Series, the Royals were still assigned with somewhat-decent odds to get something due to market size but our number didn't get picked.

[Dartgod]

Originally Posted by alnorth

Welp, MLB just had their competitive balance lottery and we completely lost out.

15 teams were eligible for 12 picks (6 after round 1 and 6 after round 2) Even though we went to the World Series, the Royals were still assigned with somewhat-decent odds to get something due to market size but our number didn't get picked.

Rigged!

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by alnorth

Welp, MLB just had their competitive balance lottery and we completely lost out.

15 teams were eligible for 12 picks (6 after round 1 and 6 after round 2) Even though we went to the World Series, the Royals were still assigned with somewhat-decent odds to get something due to market size but our number didn't get picked.

Didn't the same thing happen last year? We were eligible in each round and got neither a first or second. WTF?

[alnorth]

The Cardinals were also one of the 3 teams eligible that lost out, so at least there's that. Maybe the computers hate Missouri.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by alnorth

The Cardinals were also one of the 3 teams eligible that lost out, so at least there's that. Maybe the computers hate Missouri.

The Cards got a pick last year, IIRC.

[alnorth]

We were significantly penalized for making it to the world series, but according to the stories, we still had roughly a 4% chance of getting the best lottery pick. So, 4% for the 1st, with those odds going up each time, with 12 chances, I figure we were at least 2/3 to get something.

[Anyong Bluth]

Royals maybe taking a look at Haren (Marlins) and Parra (Brewers) according to Yahoo Sports.

I would think that these are backup plans for our backup plan if the market goes nuts and it becomes a bidding war?

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Al Bundy

Saw something on twitter about Latos wearing out his welcome in Miami, like he did in Cincinnati.

I read that some teams aren't interested due to clubhouse issues

[KevB]

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth

Royals maybe taking a look at Haren (Marlins) and Parra (Brewers) according to Yahoo Sports.

I would think that these are backup plans for our backup plan if the market goes nuts and it becomes a bidding war?

I get Parra, but I'd think Haren would be in the 10-20 range of pitchers we'd consider, and probably isn't worth giving up anything tbh. I don't think he improves what we currently have, other than adding depth.

[C3HIEF3S]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I read that some teams aren't interested due to clubhouse issues

Would find it hard to see the Royals, especially, be willing to risk disrupting the clubhouse chemistry.

[C3HIEF3S]

Ned Yost confirms that Jason Vargas will need surgery. Also says John Lamb was not in consideration to start on Sunday. #Royals

— Josh Vernier (@JoshVernier610) July 22, 2015