Chiefs Andy Reid shuts down your Chiefs QB controversy talk - Page 15

oaklandhater · 10-31-2016, 02:30 PM

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2016/1...ntroversy-talk

55
by Joel Thorman Oct 31, 2016, 2:44p

You know Andy Reid was going to stand by Alex Smith and that’s what he did on Monday when facing the press. Reid has been doing this for a loooong time so he let reporters have their fun for a few minutes and then he shut down any talk of Nick Foles playing in front of a healthy Alex Smith. Will it work? I guess it depends on how well Foles plays this weekend ... if he plays this weekend since the Chiefs doctors contend Alex actually doesn’t have a concussion.

Check out this exchange between Reid and reporters this afternoon.

Q: You were asked whether you had to cut back the game plan when Foles came in and you said no. Did he allow you to expand the game plan, maybe do some things that you couldn’t do with Smith?

Reid: No. Alex, I’m not sure we realize how good he is. We’ve opened this thing up further than maybe we’ve ever opened it up. He does a tremendous job. It’s a shame he didn’t have a chance to finish off the game plan because he would’ve had a ton of success with it. Not to take anything away from Nick. We didn’t have to cut a thing out for Nick coming in. That was a win-win for both guys. To think one would’ve done better than the other, I don’t believe that. If Alex would’ve been in, we would’ve done the same thing.

Q: You guys his four passes of 30 yards down the field. That’s unusual for you guys. Was that because the way the game was going or because of who was at quarterback?

Reid: I think it was part of the plan. That was all in the game plan. They would’ve been called. They were right on the first 15. They were coming up so whether it was Alex in there or Nick they were coming up. A couple of them formation wise, there was a little confusion on the formation and guys popped open.

Q: Does Foles give you more capability in that area?

Reid: No, I’m not even sure I like the way you’re going with this. Alex can do all the things that need to be done in this offense and do them at a Pro Bowl-caliber level.

Q: Is he your quarterback when he’s healthy then?

/death stare

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod

You idiots have NO PROOF that Foles will do better than Alex with this offense.

All you have is a partial game against one of the worst defenses in the league.

By all means though, turn what's left of this successful season over to an unknown.

Smiff wasn't making them look like one of the worst defenses in the league though. Foles did.

oaklandhater · 11-01-2016, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod

You idiots have NO PROOF that Foles will do better than Alex with this offense.

All you have is a partial game against one of the worst defenses in the league.

By all means though, turn what's left of this successful season over to an unknown.

Alex been godawful this season you can't blame people for wanting a qb who can bomb it deep

And other then his games won stat none go you a-holes have a leg to stand on for why Alex deserve a solid starting spot on this team

Hammock Parties · 11-01-2016, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod

You idiots have NO PROOF that Foles will do better than Alex with this offense.

All you have is a partial game against one of the worst defenses in the league.

So we have proof?

K thxbai

Hammock Parties · 11-01-2016, 03:29 PM

Does anyone REALLY think this offense will be worse than 23rd with Foles starting?

REALLY?

He would have to be really ****ing bad for that to happen.

oaklandhater · 11-01-2016, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

Does anyone REALLY think this offense will be worse than 23rd with Foles starting?

REALLY?

He would have to be really ****ing bad for that to happen.

Better to suck with what you know then take a chance on a unknown QB that's to risky for 75% chiefs fan base.

ChiefsLV · 11-01-2016, 04:54 PM

Smith has really underperformed given the talent that's around him. Foles performance gave us a glimpse of what this offense could be.

**Ming the Merciless** · 11-01-2016, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

Does anyone REALLY think this offense will be worse than 23rd with Foles starting?

REALLY?

Tiger Uppercut and Stevie Ray and Bob Dole do

stevieray · 11-01-2016, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod

You idiots have NO PROOF that Foles will do better than Alex with this offense.

All you have is a partial game against one of the worst defenses in the league.

By all means though, turn what's left of this successful season over to an unknown.

same as it ever was...

**Ming the Merciless** · 11-01-2016, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod

You idiots have NO PROOF that Foles will do better than Alex with this offense.

except for the 12 years of tape and stats of alex smith and the 5 years of tape and stats of foles....

is it concrete evidence? no. Is everyone saying to start Foles now? no.

People are saying his ceiling is higher and his floor is lower..and that the safest best bet this season is to roll with ALex...

What would you like as 'proof' ? Math? A thesis?

Sannyasi · 11-01-2016, 06:15 PM

The 16-3 in the last 19 games stat is so misleading. Why not say we are 17-8 since the beginning of last season. That's still a good record and its more honest.

oaklandhater · 11-01-2016, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

Tiger Uppercut and Stevie Ray and Bob Dole do

based on one stat its freaking insane.

Sandy Vagina · 11-01-2016, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi

The 16-3 in the last 19 games stat is so misleading. Why not say we are 17-8 since the beginning of last season. That's still a good record and its more honest.

If you collect a player's first handful of awful years stats on 1 team... and then add them to his next handful of good stats on another team... when discussing how good the player is now.. That, I get as being dishonest or misleading.

.. but I'm curious to know why one of these sets of stats in your post would be any less honest than another...

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 11-01-2016, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

Does anyone REALLY think this offense will be worse than 23rd with Foles starting?

REALLY?

He would have to be really ****ing bad for that to happen.

Looking at Foles' last 20 games, yes.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 11-01-2016, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsLV

Smith has really underperformed given the talent that's around him. Foles performance gave us a glimpse of what this offense could be.

Dummy. This team won how many games before Smith??

eDave · 11-01-2016, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut

Looking at Foles' last 20 games, yes.

Pffft. Foles came off the bench against a shit defense and one that didn't plan for him. Ergo, Foles is bestest.

10-31-2016, 02:30 PM
oaklandhater future chiefs fans Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: oakland california Casino cash: $5888993	Andy Reid shuts down your Chiefs QB controversy talk http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2016/1...ntroversy-talk 55 by Joel Thorman Oct 31, 2016, 2:44p You know Andy Reid was going to stand by Alex Smith and that’s what he did on Monday when facing the press. Reid has been doing this for a loooong time so he let reporters have their fun for a few minutes and then he shut down any talk of Nick Foles playing in front of a healthy Alex Smith. Will it work? I guess it depends on how well Foles plays this weekend ... if he plays this weekend since the Chiefs doctors contend Alex actually doesn’t have a concussion. Check out this exchange between Reid and reporters this afternoon. Q: You were asked whether you had to cut back the game plan when Foles came in and you said no. Did he allow you to expand the game plan, maybe do some things that you couldn’t do with Smith? Reid: No. Alex, I’m not sure we realize how good he is. We’ve opened this thing up further than maybe we’ve ever opened it up. He does a tremendous job. It’s a shame he didn’t have a chance to finish off the game plan because he would’ve had a ton of success with it. Not to take anything away from Nick. We didn’t have to cut a thing out for Nick coming in. That was a win-win for both guys. To think one would’ve done better than the other, I don’t believe that. If Alex would’ve been in, we would’ve done the same thing. Q: You guys his four passes of 30 yards down the field. That’s unusual for you guys. Was that because the way the game was going or because of who was at quarterback? Reid: I think it was part of the plan. That was all in the game plan. They would’ve been called. They were right on the first 15. They were coming up so whether it was Alex in there or Nick they were coming up. A couple of them formation wise, there was a little confusion on the formation and guys popped open. Q: Does Foles give you more capability in that area? Reid: No, I’m not even sure I like the way you’re going with this. Alex can do all the things that need to be done in this offense and do them at a Pro Bowl-caliber level. Q: Is he your quarterback when he’s healthy then? /death stare
Posts: 24,003

11-01-2016, 03:29 PM	#214
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $960478	Does anyone REALLY think this offense will be worse than 23rd with Foles starting? REALLY? He would have to be really ****ing bad for that to happen. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 296,897

11-01-2016, 04:54 PM	#216
ChiefsLV Veteran Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Las Vegas, NV Casino cash: $6132003	Smith has really underperformed given the talent that's around him. Foles performance gave us a glimpse of what this offense could be.
Posts: 1,001

11-01-2016, 06:15 PM	#220
Sannyasi Veteran Join Date: Jan 2010 Casino cash: $9963714	The 16-3 in the last 19 games stat is so misleading. Why not say we are 17-8 since the beginning of last season. That's still a good record and its more honest.
Posts: 2,616

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode