Which head coaching vacancy would you want to fill?

[luv]

Looks like there are six vacancies to fill. Which one would you want to fill? What's your reasoning?

[carcosa]

Originally Posted by MahiMike

Chicks in bikinis everywhere

Chicks in bikinis in the freaking stadium pool

HELL yeah, now I'm HORNY!!!!!

[Kiimo]

But they're Jacksonville chicks.

[displacedinMN]

I put this in the hire/fire thread. But well worth the read.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...ching-job-2016

[luv]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Have you all ever been to Jacksonville? It's uh...pretty terrible all around. That team is run poorly and totally accepting of mediocrity. I'm just saying there is talent in Denver too. If anybody chose to go to Jacksonville over Denver I'm calling that person a biased Chiefs fan. I mean, that's fine but at least you should be conscious of that.

I think it just depends on how lazy you are as a coach. You have the opportunity to go in and turn things around, or you can go in and just simply take over the reigns of someone else who has done the work. Just imagine if you could be the person who was ultimately responsible for turning a team around. It takes harder work, but I think it'd be worth it.

[displacedinMN]

Either Denver or LA.
Denver-loyal fan base. Not sure about the GM. Get the calls from the refs.
LA-the chance to build a fan base. The chance to mold a team. New stadium.

Possibly unlimited money for both.

[TripleThreat]

I just read someone make this point in another thread, and felt I agreed with him and it belonged here.

As the guy said, and as I agree, the SF job is easily the best job for anyone to want. You get hired. You can half ass the entire season to finish poorly, they will fire you, and you walk away with $25million for only coaching for a year.... I mean, Now if you want to continue being a head coach in the NFL then it might be a little different, but for instance success, there is no other option.

[RealSNR]

Every time I've gone to London I had a great time, so I'd go with Jacksonville

[DJ's left nut]

49ers.

I could be ****ing AWFUL and nobody would ever know it.

And as generally informed as I may be for a football fan, I'm a goddamn moron compared to as much as a High School football coach. I'd be an AWFUL NFL coach.

But in SF, I could just print off a bunch of madden plays, run them through a dryer cycle or two so they look worn, re-xerox them so that they look like some sort of super secret mystical playsheets and then slap them in a 3-ring binder. York wouldn't know the difference and it's not as though Kaepernick bothers to read the playbook anyway.

So really, how much worse could shit actually be? Just as long as I didn't set the stadium on fire, I'd get at least 2 seasons. Then I could probably use that as a springboard to a coordinators role with the Rams.

I'd be the modern day Lane Kiffin. Sooner or later I'd land someplace on pure pedigree that can actually win in spite of me. I may have perhaps learned/stolen a thing or two in the 10 years or so that takes and then I can get a head coaching gig at a shitty regional college that has nice weather.

Sounds like a lot more fun than sitting in an office in Columbia.

[St. Patty's Fire]

Jacksonville. Before the last 8 or so years of awfulness, that was a respectable franchise. And, currently, they're in a good position. They have some real talent on that roster and will be adding another high pick at the draft. That team looked WAY better in the last two games under Marrone than under Bradley, and even under Bradley, they were in EVERY game. Eight of their losses were by 10 points or less. Six of them were one score games. With proper coaching and good drafting, they could be a solid team as early as next year. So I'd hedge my bets on them if I were a coach.

Although, objectively, Denver is in the most ideal situation. But I wouldn't really want to be under Elway's thumb.