WHO STOLE MY BRILLIANT ATTEMPT AT HUMOUR AND WHY?

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by penchief

No, it appears that mine was the only one that was merged and it looks like it was merged with either the mod's own thread or the thread of someone that he happened to agree with.

As anyone knows, any of those other half-dozen threads will immediately appear on the first page as soon as somebody responds to them.

Look, I don't take my self TOO seriously. But, I'll confess that there are prinicples that I feel very strongly about. For someone to alter another's words or intentions and then basically hem and haw about it like it was totally innocent when their explanation appears to be full of shit...well, that doesn't cut it either.

Your words were switched? You made a freaking parody thread for christ sakes. It wasn't like you were saying anything insightful.

A parody thread you made was turned into another parody thread.

Build a bridge, get over it.

[penchief]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Your words were switched? You made a freaking parody thread for christ sakes. It wasn't like you were saying anything insightful.

A parody thread you made was turned into another parody thread.

Build a bridge, get over it.

I'm over it. The point now is to debate the intent of the person who changed the wording of a thread title that he didn't start. If it were an innocent merging of threads, not only would ALL of the parody threads (instead of just the two) been merged but whoever did it would not have applied a thread title to a thread that was incongruent with that title.

Who started the thread titled, "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS?"

I'd be interested to know. Since it looks like I did, I guess we'll never know unless that person admits it or someone else remembers.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by penchief

I'm over it. The point now is to debate the intent of the person who changed the wording of a thread title that he didn't start. If it were an innocent merging of threads, not only would ALL of the parody threads (instead of just the two) been merged but whoever did it would not have applied a thread title to a thread that was incongruent with that title.

Who started the thread titled, "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS?"

I'd be interested to know. Since it looks like I did, I guess we'll never know unless that person admits it or someone else remembers.

Listen closely.

NOBODY STARTED A THREAD TITLED "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS!"

I merged 6 threads together and RENAMED ALL OF THEM.

Is it that hard to understand?

[penchief]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Listen closely.

NOBODY STARTED A THREAD TITLED "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS!"

I merged 6 threads together and RENAMED ALL OF THEM.

Is it that hard to understand?

Bullshit! I saw the thread before I went back to work. My thread, and everybody else's parody thread, was still existent. And yes, you are correct, there were five or six of them. But don't try to tell me that nobody started a "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread because I saw it. And I'm quite certain others did, too.

And don't try to explain that you or anyone else combined all of the parody threads because the other parody threads are still out there while the threads you claim to combine has only 16 posts, 10 of which occurred on my thread before I went back to work.

This is no longer about my being a prick. This is about the integrity of this forum, IMO. Don't get me wrong. I have always liked you but I think you are being stubborn, unfair, and dishonest in this instance.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by penchief

Bullshit! I saw the thread before I went back to work. My thread, and everybody else's parody thread, was still existent. And yes, you are correct, there were five or six of them. But don't try to tell me that nobody started a "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread because I saw it. And I'm quite certain others did, too.

And don't try to explain that you or anyone else combined all of the parody threads because the other parody threads are still out there while the threads you claim to combine has only 16 posts, 10 of which occurred on my thread before I went back to work.

This is no longer about my being a prick. This is about the integrity of this forum, IMO. Don't get me wrong. I have always liked you but I think you are being stubborn, unfair, and dishonest in this instance.

Look, I'm done trying to explain this to you. I KNOW what I did, and it's in the logs for the other mods to see.

The "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread you saw was in the process of being merged. The first thread I merged was not yours, which is why both existed simultaneously.

Of course, you don't know this, because you're not a mod and you DON'T HAVE A ****ING CLUE how this software works. Because if you did, you'd know that you can only merge TWO THREADS AT A TIME. That means to merge 6 threads, I had to go through the process 5 separate times, resulting in the parody threads AS WELL AS the merged thread existing simultaneously.

4 of the 6 threads I merged had only 1 post - the starter - including yours. The other two had only a handful of posts. As for the other posts being out there, I'm going to merge them right now since you're such a ****ing pussy about it.

This isn't about the integrity of the forum, this is about you being righteously indignant for no ****ing reason at all.

[chefsos]

OMFG! The thread title changed again! The neighbors are gonna think I'm a reerun. Laughing my ass off, and nobody else is here! Sh*t!

[penchief]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Look, I'm done trying to explain this to you. I KNOW what I did, and it's in the logs for the other mods to see.

The "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread you saw was in the process of being merged. The first thread I merged was not yours, which is why both existed simultaneously.

Of course, you don't know this, because you're not a mod and you DON'T HAVE A ****ING CLUE how this software works. Because if you did, you'd know that you can only merge TWO THREADS AT A TIME. That means to merge 6 threads, I had to go through the process 5 separate times, resulting in the parody threads AS WELL AS the merged thread existing simultaneously.

4 of the 6 threads I merged had only 1 post - the starter - including yours. The other two had only a handful of posts. As for the other posts being out there, I'm going to merge them right now since you're such a ****ing pussy about it.

This isn't about the integrity of the forum, this is about you being righteously indignant for no ****ing reason at all.

Okay, since you condensed "ALL" of those threads under one thread title, why did you use YOUR thread title instead of mine when the only posts on that thread were in response to my thread title?

Why didn't you condense all of those threads and attribute them to you?

That is my point. Understand?

It is dishonest to do what you did, IMO. Let alone the fact that you didn't condense more than just two threads (if that) even though you claim to have done so.

If it was a mistake, I can accept that but don't try to make me look like I'm being unreasonable. I feel like it was your intent to enhance your own prestige by using your mod powers to fuch with someone whose opinion you resent or disagree with.

[Hammock Parties]

Hey, pen, I stole your poopy pants. I can't hide my secret any longer.

If you want them back, send $10,000 in unmarked bills to the corner of 5th and Main in a black duffel bag with white straps. Put it in the green trash can.

[Skip Towne]

Call a waaaambulance.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by penchief

Okay, since you condensed "ALL" of those threads under one thread title, why did you use YOUR thread title instead of mine when the only posts on that thread were in response to my thread title?

Why didn't you condense all of those threads and attribute them to you?

That is my point. Understand?

It is dishonest to do what you did, IMO. Let alone the fact that you didn't condense more than just two threads (if that) even though you claim to have done so.

If it was a mistake, I can accept that but don't try to make me look like I'm being unreasonable. I feel like it was your intent to enhance your own prestige by using your mod powers to fuch with someone whose opinion you resent or disagree with.

I did not use MY thread title, because I didn't start a thread. I named a merged thread. Of course, you don't understand.

I find it funny, ironic, and pathetic that you started an entirely new thread to find out WHO changed your thread title because you didn't know, but at the same time you accuse me of attributing those other threads to myself. If I were taking credit for them, don't you think you'd KNOW who changed your thread?

You don't KNOW what the facts are, the rest of the mods do. It's in the logs. I can rest easy knowing that the other mods are honest and fair, while you continue to act like an ass.

Enhance my prestige? Give me a ****ing break. I merged SPAM threads after several people complained.

But by all means, if you want to continue talking out of your ass, go ahead. I'm quite certain at least 100 people have seen this thread and now think much less of you than they did before. One post in this thread has garnered me more rep than any other single post I've ever made.

[mikey23545]

Originally Posted by frenchief

Bullshit! I saw the thread before I went back to work. My thread, and everybody else's parody thread, was still existent. And yes, you are correct, there were five or six of them. But don't try to tell me that nobody started a "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread because I saw it. And I'm quite certain others did, too.

And don't try to explain that you or anyone else combined all of the parody threads because the other parody threads are still out there while the threads you claim to combine has only 16 posts, 10 of which occurred on my thread before I went back to work.

This is no longer about my being a prick. This is about the integrity of this forum, IMO. Don't get me wrong. I have always liked you but I think you are being stubborn, unfair, and dishonest in this instance.

If this whole thread doesn't speak volumes about a liberal's mindset, I don't know what does...

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by mikey23545

If this whole thread doesn't speak volumes about a liberal's mindset, I don't know what does...

oh shut the fuuck up you dumb,cocksucking conservative pile of diarrhea.



this thread doesn't need anymore bullchit ... it smells bad enough


go back to having sex with your momma/sister/aunt and leave well enough alone.

[chiefs4me]

Originally Posted by Laz

oh shut the fuuck up you dumb,cocksucking conservative pile of diarrhea.



this thread doesn't need anymore bullchit ... it smells bad enough


go back to having sex with your momma/sister/aunt and leave well enough alone.

.....watch out Laz, he is looking for the pm button to send you his number....

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by Laz

oh shut the fuuck up you dumb,cocksucking conservative pile of diarrhea.



this thread doesn't need anymore bullchit ... it smells bad enough


go back to having sex with your momma/sister/aunt and leave well enough alone.

I cant harly ufg[j typeu

[mikey23545]

Originally Posted by Laz

oh shut the fuuck up you dumb,cocksucking conservative pile of diarrhea.



this thread doesn't need anymore bullchit ... it smells bad enough


go back to having sex with your momma/sister/aunt and leave well enough alone.

Wow, struck close to home there, didn't it?....