|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
u b illian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DooDah
Casino cash: $10009436
|
Quote:
1) We suck at the draft, generally speaking. This creates a thin roster, and that's being generous. Our depth guys are not usually the type that other teams want to outbid us for in FA. Hence, we don't have many 'qualitying' FA lost. 2) Those good/great players we do have, we typically keep them. Those that we let go, even starters such as Mitchell and Black, are not high caliber players. When we let them go, as in the case of these two guys, they are not highly qualifying lost FAs. 3) Our roster is alwasy needing a hole (or 10) to fill every offseason (See #1). Every year there are 2 or 3 or more FAs we sign to fill holes in our overall roster, cause there is no worthy young guy to step into this role, e.g. Key Fox, Scanlon/Grigsby, Svitek, etc. are not good enough to fill the holes left by Mitchell/Black. So we sign Edwards, Harris, McIntosh to do the job that should be filled by a young draftee, who has developed into a starting caliber player. This effectively wipes out our lost FAs, so the net effect is nil, and we get no compensatory picks. Think about how many high quality FA we've let go in the last 10 years. And as Amnorix illustrates, it's typically the salary that is used to judge the player quality. Donnie Edwards John Tait Joe Horn (probably not that big a salary at 1st with New Orleans) Reggie Tongue Dale Carter Neil Smith Um.... How many of those guys do you think we should have kept, just out of curiousity? |
|
Posts: 7,287
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Undercover.....
Casino cash: $6932638
|
Someone overheard Carl say "who cares?....the NFL draft is highly overrated anyway".
|
Posts: 3,643
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|