|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
If you're going "re-draft", tell us all right now who would be a better value at a need position than Pouncey to the Bucs? McCoy has been a disappointment and compared to Pouncey, he's a MAJOR disappointment. If my team needed a center and a pass rusher and I absolutely knew without a doubt that if I chose the pass rusher, I'd get four Pro Bowls out of him versus ten with a center in the same spot, I'd take the pass rusher. The problem is that no one ever truly knows for a fact before the draft. That's why a hindsight re-draft like this is interesting. Again, it's the Post-Draft value that's important. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
Can see that point. But I would still take berry over thomas. And no center top three lol
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 55,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
As I mentioned earlier, if you're looking at this "Re-Draft", do you take Dez Bryant and Nate Allen (a much better fit for this defense than Earl Thomas) or do you take Berry & McCluster? I don't think Earl Thomas was even on the Chiefs radar because his particular skillset doesn't fit Romeo's defense. And if this were 2009, I'd be absolutely thrilled with Pouncey over Jackson. ![]() |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $-1695912
|
Talking about Jackson, I wonder if he will make any impact in this game.
Remember, he played quite well in the last matchup till he got hurt. |
Posts: 47,901
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
True. That was a really solid 3 minutes of play.
|
Posts: 47,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Jackson looked "decent" in two quarters out of 112. It's not likely that he returns to that form on Sunday, although it would most certainly be welcome. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $-1695912
|
Quote:
In those 2 quarters, he got like 6 tackles and played a role in getting the lead and limiting their running game. |
|
Posts: 47,901
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|