QB Class Starting to Look Like S&@*

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

you think Carolina should pass on a potential franchise QB in hopes they are so bad again they get the #1 pick so they can take Luck?

that doesn't even make any sense

I'm not sure how that doesn't make sense. They have the toughest schedule next year, they will still have a terrible team with a new headcoach bringing in a new system.

I'd pass on both QB's and draft other positions to build the talent around Luck. They've got a damn good chance at being the worst team in the league, again.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by jd1020

I'm not sure how that doesn't make sense. They have the toughest schedule next year, they will still have a terrible team with a new headcoach bringing in a new system.

I'd pass on both QB's and draft other positions to build the talent around Luck. They've got a damn good chance at being the worst team in the league, again.

No team is going to gamble on "Well, we might get the number one pick again".

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Brock

No team is going to gamble on "Well, we might get the number one pick again".

It's not a gamble though. Throw away the season in the first of many rebuilding years under a new FO to grab the best franchise prospect out of the 2 years.

It's not like the NBA where a colored ping pong ball decides.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by jd1020

It's not a gamble though. Throw away the season in the first of many rebuilding years under a new FO to grab the best franchise prospect out of the 2 years.

It's not like the NBA where a colored ping pong ball decides.

It is a gamble. You cannot predict that there won't be a team with a worse record. That's just silly.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Brock

It is a gamble. You cannot predict that there won't be a team with a worse record. That's just silly.

You can't get much worse than 0-16 if you wanted to. The only way they wouldn't be #1 in that situation is if another team went 0-16. I'd like my chances better with their schedule and their team passing on Gabbert/Newton at #1 this year to make a run at Luck next year. Give me Fairley this year.

Now if another team wants Fairley and they can trade out of that first and get Gabbert/Newton later, then I'd jump that. But at #1? Nope.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by jd1020

You can't get much worse than 0-16 if you wanted to. The only way they wouldn't be #1 in that situation is if another team went 0-16. I'd like my chances better with their schedule and their team passing on Gabbert/Newton at #1 this year to make a run at Luck next year. Give me Fairley this year.

Now if another team wants Fairley and they can trade out of that first and get Gabbert/Newton later, then I'd jump that. But at #1? Nope.

You're telling me that an NFL team would make a conscious decision to throw 16 games. That's ridiculous.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Brock

You're telling me that an NFL team would make a conscious decision to throw 16 games. That's ridiculous.

Why is that ridiculous?