|
|
View Poll Results: How much do you write? | |||
*** Work *** |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 5.00% |
I write extensively |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 40.00% |
I write moderately |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 28.33% |
I write rarely |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 28.33% |
*** Spare Time *** |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 3.33% |
I write extensively |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 10.00% |
I write moderately |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 25.00% |
I write rarely |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 58.33% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#12 |
fides quaerens intellectum
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Casino cash: $8330900
|
A sentence from The New Yorker:
"The age of atomic energy could be said to have begun, literally, with the wave of a wand." I think the sentence sounds better like this: "One could [or: might] say the age of atomic energy began, literally, with the wave of a wand." Is my sentence better than The New Yorker's? |
Posts: 15,986
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|