Do you see what happens when teams actually have depth at CB?

[-King-]

Do people honestly look at NFL teams across the league and think their #4 and #5 CBs are good? The way people talk, you'd think teams have Revis as their 4th stringer.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by -King-

Do people honestly look at NFL teams across the league and think their #4 and #5 CBs are good? The way people talk, you'd think teams have Revis as their 4th stringer.

Funny thing, the Jets do have a 1st round pick that is their 3rd corner. The Giants as well. So...

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by -King-

Do people honestly look at NFL teams across the league and think their #4 and #5 CBs are good? The way people talk, you'd think teams have Revis as their 4th stringer.

the problem is Arenas ACTUALLY plays 50 percent of the game because we sit in Romeo's stupid nickel and sub packages. So when teams call run/draw/reverse/anything that isnt a pass, they attack Arenas because he has no idea how to stop the run, seal an edge, tackle, shed a block, etc

He's awful and he plays a lot. Don't act like Arenas is just dept that never sees the field. he's practically a starter and a lot of NFL teams are solid from CBs 1-3 in a pass happy league.

We are not one of them

In this defense you need a good run stopping CB in that nickel or sub package that can assist in those run calls offenses like to take the match up of doing. CJ Spiller was blowin us up on those draws and our CBs were getting shit on in the run game because of it.

[New World Order]

Originally Posted by -King-

Do people honestly look at NFL teams across the league and think their #4 and #5 CBs are good? The way people talk, you'd think teams have Revis as their 4th stringer.

Well we aren't talking about finding pro bowl 4th and 5th corners, we are talking about finding defensive backs that can come in the game and do a solid job if need be