Priest Holmes and the NFI list - Page 2

Mr. Laz · 09-03-2007, 10:33 AM

POSTED 10:41 a.m. EDT, September 2, 2007

CHIEFS HAD NO CHOICE IN PUTTING PRIEST ON NFI

A league source explains to us that the Kansas City Chiefs were required by rule to put running back Priest Holmes on the non-football injury list. Even though he is still recovering from an actual football injury, the fact that the injury wasn't suffered in 2007 or in 2006 makes it, by definition, a non-football injury.

The source says that Holmes' status is "the same thing" as if he were on the Physically Unable to Perform list. If so, this means that Holmes must miss at least the first six weeks of the season.

Though teams are not required to pay players who are on the NFI list, the source says that Holmes will receive his weekly game checks.

www.profootballtalk.com

09-03-2007, 10:33 AM	Topic Starter
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	Priest Holmes and the NFI list POSTED 10:41 a.m. EDT, September 2, 2007 CHIEFS HAD NO CHOICE IN PUTTING PRIEST ON NFI A league source explains to us that the Kansas City Chiefs were required by rule to put running back Priest Holmes on the non-football injury list. Even though he is still recovering from an actual football injury, the fact that the injury wasn't suffered in 2007 or in 2006 makes it, by definition, a non-football injury. The source says that Holmes' status is "the same thing" as if he were on the Physically Unable to Perform list. If so, this means that Holmes must miss at least the first six weeks of the season. Though teams are not required to pay players who are on the NFI list, the source says that Holmes will receive his weekly game checks. www.profootballtalk.com
Posts: 95,626

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode