IF Herm and Carl would have been running the draft....

[kcbubb]

Herm and Carl select:

1.) Aaron Curry OLB
2.) Everette Brown DE
3.) Kraig Urbik G/OT
4.) Louis Murphy WR
5.) Rhett Bomar QB
6.) Andrew Gardner OT
7.) AQ Shipley C
7.) Khalif Mitchell DT

The Chiefs wouldn't have traded Tony G. And they wouldn't have traded for Cassel. Thiggy would be the starting QB.

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by LaChapelle

He may not have pulled the trigger for Sanchez. Probably Jeff Garcia or some washed up Carl could drum up.

A USC QB for Carl Peterson? I can almost guarantee you he wouldn't have even considered it.

[dirk digler]

I think they Chiefs would have still tried to trade for Cassel and if that didn't work out we would have drafted Sanchez.

Clark stated many times at the beginning of the off-season how he wants a franchise QB

[Fish]

Curry would have built a rolling roof for free over the stadiums out of recycled aluminum cans if we signed him. I can't believe they didn't take that into consideration...

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Frankie

No way to tell. This thread is moot.

I think we can take a pretty good guess that Curry would have been the first pick especially since Herm said it on espn and Brown looks pretty likely with the 2nd round pick with the need for a pass rusher in the 4-3.

Herm said he needed to fill about 5 holes in one of his last press conference, so you can take some pretty good guesses to which picks fill those obvious holes that Herm had in mind.

[Ceej]

I would actually see them taking Crabtree over Curry for some reason.

[Gravedigger]

Originally Posted by shitgoose

just like it got soooo much better with the addition of Dorsey, Flowers, and Carr. Not to mention Gun running the D.......

I think the defense did get alot better with Flowers and Carr, in a dissapointing season they were some of the bright spots. And I think that he has a good point, Curry would've been better than any of our LB's except for Pat Thomas of course... let me tell ya seeing on ESPN's coverage that our Key Departures that Pat Thomas was one of them made me laugh every time.

Not to mention if Herm and Carl would've stayed Gun would've been the scape goat. Guaranteed.

[CaliforniaChief]

This thread is eerily reminiscent of when the Israelites wanted to go back to Egypt after a miracle had sprung them.

[googlegoogle]

Everette Brown has question marks.

[shitgoose]

Originally Posted by Gravedigger

I think the defense did get alot better with Flowers and Carr, in a dissapointing season they were some of the bright spots. And I think that he has a good point, Curry would've been better than any of our LB's except for Pat Thomas of course... let me tell ya seeing on ESPN's coverage that our Key Departures that Pat Thomas was one of them made me laugh every time.

Not to mention if Herm and Carl would've stayed Gun would've been the scape goat. Guaranteed.

2008 Defensive Stats:
Average Points Allowed Per Game: 27.5
Average Yards Allowed Per Game: 393.2
Total Sacks: 10 (NFL Record)
Ranking: 29th in the league

Talent wise we may have improved but statistically it was probably one of the worst defensive unit to be fielded by KC.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by CJizzles

I would actually see them taking Crabtree over Curry for some reason.

Big 12. Carl was great at that and taking guys from UCLA.

[beach tribe]

Who gives a fuq?

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

I think they Chiefs would have still tried to trade for Cassel and if that didn't work out we would have drafted Sanchez.

Clark stated many times at the beginning of the off-season how he wants a franchise QB

Originally Posted by HemiEd

A USC QB for Carl Peterson? I can almost guarantee you he wouldn't have even considered it.

There's your answer dd.