Chiefs Does anyone think that Pollard can be LB?

SenselessChiefsFan · 03-10-2009, 04:40 PM

Okay, I believed that Pollard could be a weakside backer in the 4-3. But, I was looking at the Daniels story on another website, and several fans were saying that Pollard could now move to linebacker.

I think they are crazy. Now, assuming that the Chiefs are going to a 3-4, does anybody on here think he can move to linebacker? The best chance he would have is ILB... and it is a lot of punishment for a guy who is listed at 224lbs.

Just wanted to see if the Planet's reaction was similar to mine upon reading that.

keg in kc · 03-10-2009, 04:50 PM

I don't think so.

The 3-4 may be a much better fit for him as a strong safety, since he shouldn't be in coverage as much as they asked him in the tampa 2.

Ultra Peanut · 03-10-2009, 04:54 PM

Seeing as he sucks at football? Probably not.

**DeezNutz** · 03-10-2009, 05:47 PM

I think he can play ST, though.

Pablo · 03-10-2009, 05:49 PM

I heard we're moving him to DE. Pioli was impressed with his ability to get to and injure the QB.

Noss · 03-10-2009, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88

I heard we're moving him to DE. Pioli was impressed with his ability to get to and injure the QB.

I heard that also!! Did you hear they want to move Tamba Hali to NT?

chop · 03-10-2009, 06:39 PM

Pollard should be the new FB.

Hammock Parties · 03-10-2009, 06:42 PM

I think the better question is:

Does anyone think that Pollard can play ANY position?

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-10-2009, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I don't think so.

The 3-4 may be a much better fit for him as a strong safety, since he shouldn't be in coverage as much as they asked him in the tampa 2.

This. Let him patrol the running back, and all will be well.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-10-2009, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

I think the better question is:

Does anyone think that Pollard can play ANY position?

**the Talking Can** · 03-10-2009, 06:54 PM

GoHuge · 03-10-2009, 07:23 PM

He'd be better there than at safety. Put some weight on him and he's got the skills. Hell he's even lost his big hit rep at safety because he's always out of position. I haven't seen him lay somebody out in a while besides rolling up on Brady.

**SAUTO** · 03-10-2009, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoHuge39

He'd be better there than at safety. Put some weight on him and he's got the skills. Hell he's even lost his big hit rep at safety because he's always out of position. I haven't seen him lay somebody out in a while besides rolling up on Brady.

did you watch much last year? he had some blasters, clay could probably hook those up for ya

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-10-2009, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

did you watch much last year? he had some blasters, clay could probably hook those up for ya

He and Flowers absolutely went to work on Oakland.

It was a thing of beauty...

seaofred · 03-10-2009, 07:32 PM

I like Pollard as a saftey. He was not a cover two saftey. I think in the 3-4 we will see him become a stud.

03-10-2009, 04:40 PM
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	Does anyone think that Pollard can be LB? Okay, I believed that Pollard could be a weakside backer in the 4-3. But, I was looking at the Daniels story on another website, and several fans were saying that Pollard could now move to linebacker. I think they are crazy. Now, assuming that the Chiefs are going to a 3-4, does anybody on here think he can move to linebacker? The best chance he would have is ILB... and it is a lot of punishment for a guy who is listed at 224lbs. Just wanted to see if the Planet's reaction was similar to mine upon reading that.
Posts: 5,540

03-10-2009, 04:50 PM	#2
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	I don't think so. The 3-4 may be a much better fit for him as a strong safety, since he shouldn't be in coverage as much as they asked him in the tampa 2.
Posts: 58,682

03-10-2009, 04:54 PM	#3
Ultra Peanut v^V^v^V^v^V^ Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Holland* Casino cash: $10005177	Seeing as he sucks at football? Probably not. __________________
Posts: 39,518

03-10-2009, 05:49 PM	#5
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northland Casino cash: $-1700644	I heard we're moving him to DE. Pioli was impressed with his ability to get to and injure the QB.
Posts: 43,810

03-10-2009, 06:39 PM	#7
chop Go Chiefs! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Michigan Casino cash: $934270	Pollard should be the new FB. __________________ Never be satisfied with what you achieve, because it all pales in comparison with what you are capable of doing in the future.
Posts: 2,964

03-10-2009, 06:42 PM	#8
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $990478	I think the better question is: Does anyone think that Pollard can play ANY position? __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 296,802

03-10-2009, 06:54 PM	#11
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $9342208	no __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

03-10-2009, 07:23 PM	#12
GoHuge The Truth Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Overland Park Casino cash: $10006072	He'd be better there than at safety. Put some weight on him and he's got the skills. Hell he's even lost his big hit rep at safety because he's always out of position. I haven't seen him lay somebody out in a while besides rolling up on Brady.
Posts: 3,991

03-10-2009, 07:32 PM	#15
seaofred Wish I had something clever... Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Trout fishing capital USA Casino cash: $2095333	I like Pollard as a saftey. He was not a cover two saftey. I think in the 3-4 we will see him become a stud. __________________
Posts: 1,665

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode