Your Post-Season Cuts Here.... - Page 3

**TinyEvel** · 12-27-2006, 11:10 AM

Dee fucking Brown.
And Hicks. And Sims.

And Maybe Ty Law. I'm sick of seeing the game announcers introduce our DBs as "The most experienced, collectively, in the NFL" and then watch teams (like the MOTHERfuckING CLEVELAND BROWNS!!) pass against us.

Wile_E_Coyote · 12-27-2006, 11:39 AM

the dude is more tired than angry. How many carries is he up to now? He has already broken the Chiefs record for carries in a season

el borracho · 12-27-2006, 12:17 PM

OT- Bober, Turley and Welbourne (and Shields probably retires)
WR- Gardner
DT- Sims
DE- Hicks
QB- Huard
RB- Brown
S- Knight
CB- Sapp

In order for this to happen, the Chiefs would have to draft at least two Olinemen early and probably have to slide one of our extra tackles over to guard. We would also need to draft either a DT or a WR early to improve ourselves there which leaves the second day of the draft for a WR or DT (whichever we don't take early), a DE, a CB and a S. All possible as long as Peterless doesn't do anything stupid.

**Rain Man** · 12-27-2006, 12:39 PM

I think I would keep all of these guys unless or until we prove in training camp that someone else is better.

FringeNC · 12-27-2006, 12:44 PM

The Three

: Carl, Herm, Gun.

**penguinz** · 12-27-2006, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Who would you cut after Sunday?

Tynes, Wesley, Knight, Bell, Hall, Hicks, Turley, Cunningham, Solari, ST Coach

How can you cut someone who is not under contract at the end of the season?

Chris Meck · 12-27-2006, 01:42 PM

I'd cut:

Wesley, Bell, Hicks, Knight, Law.

I'd assume that these guys will be gone via F.A. or retirement:
Shields, Huard, Sims (we wouldn't even try to re-sign him).

Hall is fine, his blocking hasn't really been there much.

I'd try to re-sign: Mitchell, Gonzales, Tynes.

I'd concentrate in the draft on DT, OT, CB, WR.

I'd probably look in FA for an upgrade at LT and/or RT. Perhaps Terry is the answer at RT, and that would be nice if so.

I'd look at Black as a G if you can upgrade LT. I think he's a good player, I just think that he's out of position at the pro level. His arms are a little short and his lateral quickness is just average. I think he could be a fine guard.

I'd prefer to fix DT in the draft if possible, as I'd like to concentrate on getting younger there; it will need to be our strength in '08.

Bring Trent back one more year, promote Brody to #2. Another year of learning, taking the #2 snaps and hopefully putting a little weight on will ease him in.

I like Wilson at FB/H-Back. I think we could utilize him MORE, and his blocking has improved. I'd like to see more play-action passing, particularly on 1st down.

The biggest keys will be the hand-off to the young safety tandem and upgrading the DT situation. We're weak up the middle on defense, so the cover 2 style defense has been spotty.

You guys that want to draft a first round WR are being silly; nobody'd have enough time to find them downfield with our pass blocking. Fix the lines first and THEN your playmakers can make plays. If you have a good enough line, you can do just fine with only decent WR's.

just my .02

Mecca · 12-27-2006, 01:43 PM

I'd like to hear one good reason we should keep Mitchell.....and "we don't have anyone else" isn't a good reason.

Hammock Parties · 12-27-2006, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I'd like to hear one good reason we should keep Mitchell.....and "we don't have anyone else" isn't a good reason.

If they're going to sign Donnie Edwards it's probably a good idea to dump him. Otherwise...HTF is out there?

Mecca · 12-27-2006, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

If they're going to sign Donnie Edwards it's probably a good idea to dump him. Otherwise...HTF is out there?

We aren't winning a Superbowl next year......overpaying for an average player like Mitchell is a bad idea in general, it's a real bad idea when your team is more or less in transition.

Hammock Parties · 12-27-2006, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

We aren't winning a Superbowl next year......overpaying for an average player like Mitchell is a bad idea in general, it's a real bad idea when your team is more or less in transition.

That's just ****ing great, Mecca. We drafted him in 2003 and we dump him three years later and start over with another young guy?

Mecca · 12-27-2006, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

That's just ****ing great, Mecca. We drafted him in 2003 and we dump him three years later and start over with another young guy?

He's not good enough.......Like has been said by me before he's not even in the top 20 of MLB's how that justifies a new contract is beyond me. I could careless that he's young he's not good.

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-27-2006, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

That's just ****ing great, Mecca. We drafted him in 2003 and we dump him three years later and start over with another young guy?

I'm kinda with Mecca on this one, because then KC could slide DJ at MLB, Key Fox at WSLB, and the (pipe dream) Kris Griffin will pan out at SSLB

Archie Bunker · 12-27-2006, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

If they're going to sign Donnie Edwards it's probably a good idea to dump him. Otherwise...HTF is out there?

I think that is exactly what they are going to do. Carl gets to correct his "mistake" and stick it to Marty at the same time.

Hammock Parties · 12-27-2006, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker

I think that is exactly what they are going to do. Carl gets to correct his "mistake" and stick it to Marty at the same time.

I look forward to Mecca's posts next year telling us how old and overrated Donnie Edwards is. He'll be the Ty Law of linebackers!

12-27-2006, 11:10 AM	#1
TinyEvel Just a li'l Evel Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bald. Goatee. Jorts. Casino cash: $2269601	Dee fucking Brown. And Hicks. And Sims. And Maybe Ty Law. I'm sick of seeing the game announcers introduce our DBs as "The most experienced, collectively, in the NFL" and then watch teams (like the MOTHERfuckING CLEVELAND BROWNS!!) pass against us.
Posts: 12,317

12-27-2006, 12:17 PM	#3
el borracho In Pat We Trust Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $2589148	I would cut the following: OT- Bober, Turley and Welbourne (and Shields probably retires) WR- Gardner DT- Sims DE- Hicks QB- Huard RB- Brown S- Knight CB- Sapp In order for this to happen, the Chiefs would have to draft at least two Olinemen early and probably have to slide one of our extra tackles over to guard. We would also need to draft either a DT or a WR early to improve ourselves there which leaves the second day of the draft for a WR or DT (whichever we don't take early), a DE, a CB and a S. All possible as long as Peterless doesn't do anything stupid.
Posts: 12,261

12-27-2006, 12:39 PM	#4
Rain Man Seize life. Be an ermine. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $-602449 VARSITY	I think I would keep all of these guys unless or until we prove in training camp that someone else is better. __________________ Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history.
Posts: 145,405

12-27-2006, 12:44 PM	#5
FringeNC MVP Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: NC Casino cash: $-1713986	The Three : Carl, Herm, Gun.
Posts: 10,234

12-27-2006, 01:42 PM	#7
Chris Meck MVP Join Date: May 2001 Location: midtown KC Casino cash: $-1295090	I'd cut: Wesley, Bell, Hicks, Knight, Law. I'd assume that these guys will be gone via F.A. or retirement: Shields, Huard, Sims (we wouldn't even try to re-sign him). Hall is fine, his blocking hasn't really been there much. I'd try to re-sign: Mitchell, Gonzales, Tynes. I'd concentrate in the draft on DT, OT, CB, WR. I'd probably look in FA for an upgrade at LT and/or RT. Perhaps Terry is the answer at RT, and that would be nice if so. I'd look at Black as a G if you can upgrade LT. I think he's a good player, I just think that he's out of position at the pro level. His arms are a little short and his lateral quickness is just average. I think he could be a fine guard. I'd prefer to fix DT in the draft if possible, as I'd like to concentrate on getting younger there; it will need to be our strength in '08. Bring Trent back one more year, promote Brody to #2. Another year of learning, taking the #2 snaps and hopefully putting a little weight on will ease him in. I like Wilson at FB/H-Back. I think we could utilize him MORE, and his blocking has improved. I'd like to see more play-action passing, particularly on 1st down. The biggest keys will be the hand-off to the young safety tandem and upgrading the DT situation. We're weak up the middle on defense, so the cover 2 style defense has been spotty. You guys that want to draft a first round WR are being silly; nobody'd have enough time to find them downfield with our pass blocking. Fix the lines first and THEN your playmakers can make plays. If you have a good enough line, you can do just fine with only decent WR's. just my .02
Posts: 19,457

12-27-2006, 11:39 AM	#2
Wile_E_Coyote avatar down for remodel Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	the dude is more tired than angry. How many carries is he up to now? He has already broken the Chiefs record for carries in a season
Posts: 6,009

12-27-2006, 01:43 PM	#8
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-642950	I'd like to hear one good reason we should keep Mitchell.....and "we don't have anyone else" isn't a good reason.
Posts: 115,343