Obama's record. A snapshot of facts

[BigRedChief]

Obama Job creator?




Manufacturing




Obama the big spender?


Home Prices


Stock market

[VAChief]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

What would a Promise Made/Promise Kept chart look like?

Would it include how many Obama phones were given out between 08'-12'?

Would you settle for a giant banner proclaiming..."Mission Accomplished!"

[qabbaan]

Hay guys here is something I found on democrat underground! Game changar!

[HonestChieffan]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

As of today Obama has created net jobs since the BLS has revised their data from the last year and found 368,000 more jobs

And by November we will find a bazillion more, retail sales will be up, and our world will all be roses and goodness! Christ you people will fall for anything.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by HonestChieffan

And by November we will find a bazillion more, retail sales will be up, and our world will all be roses and goodness! Christ you people will fall for anything.

I know it is all a conspiracy yet it happens every year

At 8:30 a.m. on the first Friday of each month, political and financial analysts across the country begin hitting refresh on their browsers maniacally. That’s when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its monthly jobs numbers — one of the most closely-watched indicators of the state of the U.S. economy.

Yet it turns out that the monthly numbers are almost always wrong. In fact, over the past twelve months, they’ve been wildly wrong. On Thursday, BLS released newly revised data showing that the U.S. economy has actually added 386,000 more jobs in the past year than the monthly reports suggested. In other words, the average monthly BLS report over the last year has understated job growth by about 32,000 jobs.

To put it another way, the U.S. economy has been adding 194,000 jobs per month over the past year, rather than 162,000 jobs per month. That means that the country is on pace to get back to full employment by 2021 rather than after 2025, according to the Hamilton Project’s calculator. (Although it’s still a slow recovery by either measure.) It also means that the United States has now seen a net gain in jobs since President Obama took office in 2009.

Economist Justin Wolfers wonders why these revisions aren’t generating nearly as much fanfare. “Amazing how much attention a 30k miss on a monthly jobs number gets,” he writes on Twitter, “and how little follows when 386k more jobs are found in a re-benchmark.” Wolfers adds that this revision may help explain why the unemployment rate keeps nudging downward despite the apparently weak jobs growth.

According to the new BLS revisions, the United States actually shed about 67,000 government jobs at the federal, state, and local level over the past year. Private-sector jobs, by contrast, grew by 453,000 more than expected.

What explains the change? Once a year, the BLS creates a “benchmark” for its jobs numbers by poring over administrative data from companies across the country. This helps the agency generate more accurate numbers, but it also takes about 10 months to do, which is why the government has to provide rough estimates on a monthly basis. The agency will publish its final benchmark revisions Feb. 1, 2013.

But the sweeping revision suggests we could probably stand to put a little less emphasis on those monthly jobs reports.

[HonestChieffan]

Americans must be wondering how much more of this “recovery” they can afford. New figures from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, compiled by Sentier Research, show that the typical American household’s real (inflation-adjusted) income has actually dropped 5.7 percent during the Obama “recovery.” Using constant 2012 dollars (to adjust for inflation), the median annual income of American households was $53,718 as of June 2009, the last month of the recession. Now, after 38 months of this “recovery,” it has fallen to $50,678 — a drop of $3,040 per household.

Yet it gets worse. Amazingly, incomes have dropped even more during the “recovery” than they did during the recession. In fact, they’ve dropped more than twice as much as they did during the recession. From the start to the end of the recession, the real median income of American households fell $1,413, or 2.6 percent. From the end of the recession to the present day, it has dropped $3,040, or 5.7 percent. This begs the question: What kind of “recovery” compares unfavorably with the recession from which it’s ostensibly recovering?

Keep Reading....http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...ry_653116.html

[HonestChieffan]

[dirk digler]

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Birth Certificate--not a Certificate of Live Birth, whatever that is.

[ReynardMuldrake]

Originally Posted by HonestChieffan

Well done.

No chart on the deficit...check. No chart on the size of the workforce...check....No chart on fuel and food costs...check....No chart on promises made/Promises kept...check.

Suckers

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/oba...nferno-or-not/


http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/...ver-the-years/


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...9OLJ_blog.html

The Obameter Scorecard
Promise Kept 192 (38%)
Compromise 75 (15%)
Promise Broken 85 (17%)
Stalled 46 (9%)
In the Works 108 (21%)
Not yet rated 2 (0%)

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ises/obameter/

These things can be found if you google them.

[petegz28]

Guess you forgot this one..

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Guess you forgot this one..

maybe because its a republican party pathetic abuse of numbers. ones in the chart and those left out.

Mine were chart facts created by bi-partisan no horse in the race groups. Yours was just a joke but now that I know you get all your news from Drudge, thats to be expected.

[Calcountry]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

whatever unless you hear it on Drudge, its not true.

Whatever, take the graph back to the beginning of the Pelosi/Reid/Bush Regime?

Congressman Barnies frank, forced banks to loan money to have nots. Then they walked away from loans they couldn't afford, Bernank printed trillions, the rest is history.

Rock Obama borrows and spends as much as he can, the fed prints the money and hands it to him.

How is that bacon price? How is the price of corn? Gasoline?

How is the unemployment rate working?

He don't give a damn about poor people, just implementing marxist change.


Rule 1: Debauch the currency.

Rule 2: Detach the citizenry from the past.

Go ahead, America is his bitch. Go ahead and vote for him.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

maybe because its a republican party pathetic abuse of numbers. ones in the chart and those left out.

Mine were chart facts created by bi-partisan no horse in the race groups. Yours was just a joke but now that I know you get all your news from Drudge, thats to be expected.

WTF? JFC are you really that stupid? And that didn't come from Drudge, toolbar.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by petegz28

WTF? JFC are you really that stupid? And that didn't come from Drudge, toolbar.

I can ****ing read, its clear who the source is, the Republican study committe of the house of representatives. One of the most partisan groups on the face of the earth.

yeah right hurl insults, I'm stupid for being able to read.

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by Calcountry

Whatever, take the graph back to the beginning of the Pelosi/Reid/Bush Regime?

Congressman Barnies frank, forced banks to loan money to have nots. Then they walked away from loans they couldn't afford, Bernank printed trillions, the rest is history.

Pelosi/Reid/Bush regime--hilarious.

Barney Frank forced banks to loan money.