Sad white people who liked Romney

[lostcause]

Great tumblr pictoral blog and if it's a repost, that's ok because these people have serious 1st world problems that need to be shared.

http://whitepeoplemourningromney.tumblr.com/

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Literature

Why are you assuming cleaning the house and making supper is less equal than having a real career?

I'm not. Quite the contrary. What made you think I was?

[blaise]

Originally Posted by Literature

Why are you assuming cleaning the house and making supper is less equal than having a real career?

Seems like you are right there, actually.

[headsnap]

Originally Posted by Literature

Why are you assuming cleaning the house and making supper is less equal than having a real career?

more often than not the truth is hidden in plain sight...

[vailpass]

Originally Posted by headsnap

more often than not the truth is hidden in plain sight...

Touche sir, touche.

[HonestChieffan]

Originally Posted by headsnap

more often than not the truth is hidden in plain sight...

What do you suppose falls under the heading of a "real career"?

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by patteeu

I'm not. Quite the contrary. What made you think I was?

When you said, "why would you assume someone else's marriage would be less equal?"

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Could you post a picture of yourself and let us caption it? That would be fun.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Literature

When you said, "why would you assume someone else's marriage would be less equal?"

That doesn't imply that a marriage where one person works in the home is less equal than a lesbian, government-grant-scamming partnership. It's based on your suggestion that blaise might have to have several hours to properly fix dinner if his wife commands him to make something complex. So anyway, why would you assume someone else's marriage would be less equal?

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by patteeu

That doesn't imply that a marriage where one person works in the home is less equal than a lesbian, government-grant-scamming partnership. It's based on your suggestion that blaise might have to have several hours to properly fix dinner if his wife commands him to make something complex. So anyway, why would you assume someone else's marriage would be less equal?

You're the only one talking about less equal marriages here.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Literature

You're the only one talking about less equal marriages here.

OK, good. I'll take this as a retraction of your snark in post 45.

[blaise]

Originally Posted by Literature

You're the only one talking about less equal marriages here.

Have you prepared your frozen dinner for one yet?

[Comrade Crapski]

Originally Posted by Literature

Okay, so no Catholic-affiliated hospitals in rural areas by 2014 in America. That's your prediction? By the way, those Medicare and Medicaid recipients earn the Catholic hospital money. It's not charity. In fact, there's almost no such thing as charitable hospital like there was before Medicare and Medicaid.

Catholic hospitals handle more than their share of Medicare (16.6 percent) and Medicaid (13.65) discharges, meaning that more than one in six seniors and disabled patients get attention from these hospitals

30% of their patients are on medicare/medicaid.

Where are they going to go?

Who's going to provide their healthcare?

Oh, that's right. The government.

Just remember, moonbats, YOU ASKED FOR THIS. This is what you wanted. You wanted the government to take over healthcare, and now you got it.

But hey, when the SHTF, you can rejoice that 30 year old career students like Sandra Fluke can get a $15 dollar tube of spermacidal lube on the dole.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by Tom.Jay61

Catholic hospitals handle more than their share of Medicare (16.6 percent) and Medicaid (13.65) discharges, meaning that more than one in six seniors and disabled patients get attention from these hospitals

30% of their patients are on medicare/medicaid.

Where are they going to go?

Who's going to provide their healthcare?

Oh, that's right. The government.

The government already provides for their care. What do you think Medicare and Medicaid are? Catholic hospitals are nonprofits, but that doesn't mean they are charities. It just means they don't sell their stock on public markets and their profits (yes, they make profits) remain internal.

[Comrade Crapski]

Originally Posted by Literature

The government already provides for their care.

The government doesn't provide their care. The hospital provides a service that must be paid for. 30% of their customers pay with an IOU from the government to pay for goods and services rendered. Fewer and fewer health care providers are accepting medicaid/medicare because the government more and more has been stiffing them on the bill.

As a result more and more hospitals are closing, thus creating fewer and fewer options for an ever expanding pool of customers.

It would be like if the government told everybody that gasoline was free--- just pull up to the gas station pump and instead of handing the clerk a credit card or check, hand them your government voucher and tell the clerk that they will be getting paid sometime in the future. Maybe a week, maybe a month, who knows? Oh yeah, and it might be for less than the amount you charged, but it's for the greater good.

Do you think anyone would own a gas station?

You would have your "free" gas but no one to provide it.

That's what feces has done to the healthcare industry.

[HMc]

because socialised healthcare doesn't work well in any number of other 1st world nations