Who would Scott ***** draft at #1?

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Let's say hell freezes over and ***** is our GM next April. Let's say hell also then melts and freezes over again and he decides to draft a QB with the #1 pick.

Who would he pick?

There is no question in my mind he'd take Barkley.

This is a worthwhile QB thread, thanks for participating.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning

Barkley is barely 6-2 and has a questionable arm and limited mobility.

There is no way I take him #1.

I'd rather have Bray.

Wonder how many of Parcells qualifications Barkley meets?

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Wonder how many of Parcells qualifications Barkley meets?

All of them, since he's a 4-year starter, basically.

His rules are as follows:

The quarterback must be a senior. . .because you need time and maturity to develop into a good professional quarterback

He must be a graduate. . .because you want somebody that takes their responsibilities seriously.

He must be a three-year starter. . .because you want to make sure his success wasn't a fluke and to know that he has been "the guy" for a significant period of time.

He must have 23 wins. . .because big numbers don't mean a whole lot if you don't win.

[Fat Elvis]

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare

I think things are going to get real ugly real soon at arrowhead. no way ***** survives.

Clark wants consistency ( how many coordinators and head coaches under *****?). No way he axes *****. Clark doesn't want the next GM (several years down the road) to feel as though the front office is little more than a game of musical chairs.

[ILChief]

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare

I think things are going to get real ugly real soon at arrowhead. no way ***** survives.

I think it happens after the season. What's the point now

[DJ's left nut]

Please - as if this is a question.

He'll take the 'safe', wholesome kid from a major program. There's no question he'll take Barkley because Barkley can step in next year and play. He's the most limited QB available, but he also probably has the least work to do to get to at NFL ready.

Geno will be better than Barkley by the end of 2013, but he'll still be considered too risky for *****.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Clark wants consistency ( how many coordinators and head coaches under *****?). No way he axes *****. Clark doesn't want the next GM (several years down the road) to feel as though the front office is little more than a game of musical chairs.

Anyone can see ***** is one of the biggest failures of a GM in NFL history.

No sense in keeping him. A competent GM isn't gonna care that we fired ***** after the 4 worst years in franchise history.

[petegz28]

I said Landry because Scott would see a QB would available later down the pipe, trade down in the Patriot Way to get more picks and pick the worst of the lot.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Clark wants consistency ( how many coordinators and head coaches under *****?). No way he axes *****. Clark doesn't want the next GM (several years down the road) to feel as though the front office is little more than a game of musical chairs.

Musical chairs?

The last one was there 20 yrs.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Clark wants consistency ( how many coordinators and head coaches under *****?). No way he axes *****. Clark doesn't want the next GM (several years down the road) to feel as though the front office is little more than a game of musical chairs.

Could be a reason for him to get rid of *****... He wants consistency, but because ***** is such a dumbass and in love with ex-Patriot washouts he'll never get it. So maybe he'll fire him to hire someone who will get it.

[petegz28]

I can't see how anyone in their right mind would retain *****. If this was his 1st year he would get a pass. This is his 4th and we are worse than the day he got here. Not something that would get you kudos in any other walk of life.

[JoeyChuckles]

If we draft Geno, can we say Genoious! to everything he does?

If so, I hope it's him.

[BWillie]

Who will ***** draft? A defensive tackle. So the common fan wont be able to know if his draft pick failed. As usual

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning

All of them, since he's a 4-year starter, basically.

Kind of what I thought. That is our boy. ***** will follow this.

[Buzz_TinBalls]

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Clark wants consistency ( how many coordinators and head coaches under *****?). No way he axes *****. Clark doesn't want the next GM (several years down the road) to feel as though the front office is little more than a game of musical chairs.

this is *****'s forth season. He will get fired because he had plenty of time and did turn the team around, but then made some moves that forced it into a tailspin. Clark will be limited in who comes, yes, but it wont be because of fear of "musical chairs" it will be a very well founded fear of getting talent to come and help this bottom feeder of a team -- which is Clark's fault.

[TribalElder]

They tried to tank last season but Palko's tenacity kept this team in it. This year we are all in on operation rebuild through the draft.

It's cheaper thanks to the wage scale and fans allow some fail if a new QB comes in.

I gotta think the Clarks are on board, the question is will ***** have to walk the plank before April so we get someone else in here to help rebuild