Gun Control Explained

[petegz28]

[BucEyedPea]

Six bullets is her final offer?

[BucEyedPea]

He's uncivilized because he doesn't want to be neutered?

[Aries Walker]

That sure is thoughtful of the animators to put all of the fallacies in one convenient video. My favorite is "Has ['If you outlaw all the guns, only outlaws will have guns'] ever been disproven?"

[2bikemike]

That was pretty funny.

[Brainiac]

Originally Posted by Aries Walker

That sure is thoughtful of the animators to put all of the fallacies in one convenient video. My favorite is "Has ['If you outlaw all the guns, only outlaws will have guns'] ever been disproven?"

You assert that it's a fallacy, but you neglected to provide a link to the evidence that disproves it.

[Brainiac]

My favorite lines were:

"You should be willing to die for something you believe in".

"But I don't believe in gun control".

"Then you should be willing to die for something I believe in".

[Radar Chief]

Originally Posted by Aries Walker

That sure is thoughtful of the animators to put all of the fallacies in one convenient video. My favorite is "Has ['If you outlaw all the guns, only outlaws will have guns'] ever been disproven?"

Agreed. /Mexico

[Aries Walker]

Originally Posted by Pro Bowler

You assert that it's a fallacy, but you neglected to provide a link to the evidence that disproves it.

Oh, I have no intention of attempting to disprove it. I'm saying that raising it as an issue is a logical fallacy in itself, as it assumes that the purpose of gun control is to outlaw all guns.

But if you want links, I can do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_baculum

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Aries Walker

Oh, I have no intention of attempting to disprove it. I'm saying that raising it as an issue is a logical fallacy in itself, as it assumes that the purpose of gun control is to outlaw all guns.

But if you want links, I can do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_baculum

Those in Congress like Senator Nutcase Feinstein from CA do want to outlaw all guns. Just because they want to do it in phases does not mean they don't want to do it.

[RNR]

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

Agreed. /Mexico

When it comes to any additional gun laws and those who support the completely fabricated stats the shitbags use to promote them my reply is two words **** OFF. If they wish to talk training or background checks I will engage the discussion~

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by Aries Walker

That sure is thoughtful of the animators to put all of the fallacies in one convenient video. My favorite is "Has ['If you outlaw all the guns, only outlaws will have guns'] ever been disproven?"

No. One example are the criminals that ran Nazi Germany.

[RNR]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Those in Congress like Senator Nutcase Feinstein from CA do want to outlaw all guns. Just because they want to do it in phases does not mean they don't want to do it.

It is a game of inches with these shitbags. We just want the bad guns only to return later to identify more bad guns~

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

It is a game of inches with these shitbags. We just want the bad guns only to return later to identify more bad guns~

Exactly..they tell you they only want the bad guns...what they don't tell you is that they think all guns are bad guns....

[cosmo20002]

Originally Posted by Aries Walker

Oh, I have no intention of attempting to disprove it. I'm saying that raising it as an issue is a logical fallacy in itself, as it assumes that the purpose of gun control is to outlaw all guns.

But if you want links, I can do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_baculum

These links are like porn for BEP. Throw in an "ad hominem" link to really get her off.