With the first pick of the 2013 draft

[RustShack]

The Kansas City Chiefs select...

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan

Trade out

I absolutely hated this idea at first but considering our needs I'm starting to warm to it.

[CoMoChief]

Really depends what happens w/ Albert. If he's kept we will prob draft a QB

If Albert is not kept, then I'd imagine we'd draft Joeckel.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan

Trade out

Never happen.

You can't trade with nobody.

[AussieChiefsFan]

No love for wilson?

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan

No love for wilson?

I think most of the people that want Wilson want Geno more.

[AussieChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I think most of the people that want Wilson want Geno more.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan

Tis true.

[Dave]

CanadaKC is *****

[Dave]

Originally Posted by Rausch

I absolutely hated this idea at first but considering our needs I'm starting to warm to it.

Who is going to trade up?

And for who?

[suds79]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I think most of the people that want Wilson want Geno more.

Right. This poll won't be indicative of how a lot of people here feel about Wilson.

I suspect if Geno wasn't on the poll, Wilson would come in 1st here.

[suds79]

Originally Posted by Rausch

I absolutely hated this idea at first but considering our needs I'm starting to warm to it.

Here's the problem with the trade out idea.

We all agree that QB is more important than anything by a long shot. That being said, are you willing to sacrifice the #1 QB prospect for say the 3rd or 4th QB prospect just to gain an extra 2nd? Really? Is that worth it? Have you looked at recent years in the 1st top rated QB prospect vs say the 3rd? I'll save you the time. Big drop off.

[AussieChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Tis true.

I know. Tis funny.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by suds79

Here's the problem with the trade out idea.

We all agree that QB is more important than anything by a long shot. That being said, are you willing to sacrifice the #1 QB prospect for say the 3rd or 4th QB prospect just to gain an extra 2nd? Really? Is that worth it? Have you looked at recent years in the 1st top rated QB prospect vs say the 3rd? I'll save you the time. Big drop off.

The problem with the trade-out scenario is that it isn't realistic.

We need a QB but we don't think there's a QB there worth the #1 pick.

Teams trade up for QUARTERBACKS.

NOBODY is going to trade up. It's that simple.

A team is going to want to trade for a QB. If there's a QB there worth taking, we're taking him.

[ChiTown]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

The problem with the trade-out scenario is that it isn't realistic.

We need a QB but we don't think there's a QB there worth the #1 pick.

Teams trade up for QUARTERBACKS.

NOBODY is going to trade up. It's that simple.

A team is going to want to trade for a QB. If there's a QB there worth taking, we're taking him.

This x Eleventy Billion

[suds79]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

The problem with the trade-out scenario is that it isn't realistic.

We need a QB but we don't think there's a QB there worth the #1 pick.

Teams trade up for QUARTERBACKS.

NOBODY is going to trade up. It's that simple.

A team is going to want to trade for a QB. If there's a QB there worth taking, we're taking him.

Yeah great post. Another problem with trade down? Not going to have a partner.