Discussion: NSFW images in spoiler tags

[Fire Me Boy!]

Can we take a moment to seriously discuss posting NSFW and full nude images inside spoiler tags? I'm not talking about NSFW images in a thread clearly marked NSFW like the porn gif thread, but NSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).

Let's forget for a moment that posting pictures showing genitalia and nipples in general is against board policy and focus merely on the spoiler tags.

While the spoiler tags DO hide the image from view for someone walking by, they do nothing for someone whose IS folks at work peek behind the scenes. Spoiler tags only hide the image from view; the image still loads on the machine and its cache.

Am I the only person bothered by this? If I am, I'll shut up. But this is really becoming such a rampant practice, it makes me hesitant to peruse Chiefsplanet at work, even threads that should be safe to go in.

[Phobia]

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying ****!

That's not even remotely true. I've cracked the whip on two guys who have been here since Aug 2000 and are well-liked in the past couple weeks for getting loose with filter evasion. I fix every one I notice whether inner-circle or not. The irony is that I don't even care. While I'd rather not hang out frequently with a potty-mouth, profanity dosn't bother me. But it does bother some people and we have systems in place to keep this place mostly profanity-free.

[AustinChief]

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by Phobia

That's not even remotely true. I've cracked the whip on two guys who have been here since Aug 2000 and are well-liked in the past couple weeks for getting loose with filter evasion. I fix every one I notice whether inner-circle or not. The irony is that I don't even care. While I'd rather not hang out frequently with a potty-mouth, profanity dosn't bother me. But it does bother some people and we have systems in place to keep this place mostly profanity-free.

Wink wink, nudge nudge.

See you in 9 weeks...

[wazu]

Even without nudity, or even with filters on, I consider Chiefsplanet unviewable at work and removed it from the list years ago based purely on the sexually explicit discussion and racism. Threads about ass licking, or whatever Florida based story of the day is going on, or praising chocolate penis...I really don't feel like ever having to explain to my boss that its just an innocent Chiefs fan site.

[BigRichard]

Well if you would just quit jacking off at work they probably wouldn't care as much.

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by wazu

Threads about ass licking, or whatever Florida based story of the day is going on, or praising chocolate penis...I really don't feel like ever having to explain to my boss that its just an innocent Chiefs fan site.

Yeah, that'd be hard to explain for me as well...

[Fire Me Boy!]

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

Thanks. It sounds like this rule needs to be reiterated (maybe with a sticky explainer) and enforced then.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

I think its fine the way it is but if this gets **** Me Bitches panties unbunched its fine by me.

I see you feel so strongly that I bring nothing to this community that you still haven't made that thread calling for my head...

[Chief Roundup]

Why have rules if they are not going to be enforced? Why have guidelines if they are not going to be used?
Come on everyone if you agree to the terms of service then you agree to the rules. If you don't like the rules tough shit. Use the site properly or don't use it at all. This telling someone else to not use use this site because you all want to break the rules or you don't want to be put out to click on a link is ridiculous.
We have some weak mods around here anymore.

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Thanks. It sounds like this rule needs to be reiterated (maybe with a sticky explainer) and enforced then.

Vindication!!!!!!!!!



now maybe your tattletale OCD ass can shut the **** up about it

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Why have rules if they are not going to be enforced? Why have guidelines if they are not going to be used?
Come on everyone if you agree to the terms of service then you agree to the rules. If you don't like the rules tough shit. Use the site properly or don't use it at all. This telling someone else to not use use this site because you all want to break the rules or you don't want to be put out to click on a link is ridiculous.
We have some weak mods around here anymore.

Put out?

Hyperlinks are the #1 security threat to a home PC.

This isn't about laziness, numbskull.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

Linking to pornography or similar content will result in the same type of blacklisting, just FYI.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

Vindication!!!!!!!!!



now maybe your tattletale OCD ass can shut the **** up about it

Panties still in a bunch since I reported you one time? I think it's about time you got over that (especialliy since I've apologized twice). That also is the only time I've reported this issue.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Put out?

Hyperlinks are the #1 security threat to a home PC.

This isn't about laziness, numbskull.

Dude that is not what the problem is, or what this thread was about. It is about the NSFW stuff being posted directly and that is not suppose to be happening. This isn't about your computer, numbskull.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Dude that is not what the problem is, or what this thread was about. It is about the NSFW stuff being posted directly and that is not suppose to be happening. This isn't about your computer, numbskull.

Someone didn't read the OP.