Chiefs Cassel or Sanchez? - Page 10

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 06:45 PM

I realize that we are where we are, but the more I see about Sanchez, the more I'm afraid that a few years down the road, we may look back and realize that we passed up on the franchise guy that we've been looking for. I know that Cassel played ok last year, but is he a franchise guy? ...likely not. Thoughts?

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 07:58 PM

I think that we are going to pick up solid O-linemen to fill other positions later in the draft.

Mecca · 04-11-2009, 08:00 PM

Even Andre Smith who may slide some, if you want an OT your argument should be for dropping down and taking them not taking an OT at 3.

Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of this draft if the Chiefs somehow were able to get into the 12-17 range while picking up several extra picks and ended up getting an OT and a Center out of this I wouldn't complain that much this is probably the year to get some starting lineman it's one of the few real strengths of the draft.

RustShack · 04-11-2009, 08:00 PM

I personally would rather have the Pro Bowl LT moving our current one making him a Pro Bowl OG or RT instead of reaching on a consistent complementary ILB...

milkman · 04-11-2009, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

He also has the potential to be the best OG ever, he also wasn't drafted too high to be labeled as a bust if he goes back to his original position. Monroe also has that same if not more LT potential...

I'm not saying LT should be the pick... but I would rather not reach and sometimes you have to take what your dealt...

Are you ****ing high?

Are you actually saying you would rather have a Steve Hutchinson than a great Willie Roaf?

Have you ingested drugs that kill all your ****ing brain cells?

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:02 PM

No...we want both Roaf and Hutchinson

Mecca · 04-11-2009, 08:02 PM

Rust isn't even thinking about it properly, they'd play LT and RT no one in this scenario plays ****ing guard.

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

I realize that this has probably been chewed to pieces. I've always been in favor of going with the guy who has NFL experience...... Kinda rolled my eyes at the guys posting about the great hope of any draft quarterbacks. I've just had my mind changed.

The hype machine claims another.

RustShack · 04-11-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Are you ****ing high?

Are you actually saying you would rather have a Steve Hutchinson than a great Willie Roaf?

Have you ingested drugs that kill all your ****ing brain cells?

No I'm saying I would rather have a Roaf and Hutchinson than a Roaf and solid LB.

Messier · 04-11-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Derek Anderson?

Wow. That's not good reasoning.

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

The hype machine claims another.

Good to hear you crazyhorse finally.

Mecca · 04-11-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

No I'm saying I would rather have a Roaf and Hutchinson than a Roaf and solid LB.

Seattle did this, what did they win?

**the Talking Can** · 04-11-2009, 08:05 PM

two things about chiefs fans that are driving me crazy right now:

1. they want to trade down for a fraction of the value of our pick

2. they want to move our first round draft pick stud rookie LT to guard...just because...

two years in a row this shit franchsie won't spend a high pick on a QB but we're ok spending back to back firsts on the same position on the OL?

that's how championship teams are built? McFly?

and we wonder why it's been 25,000 years since our last superbowl?

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:06 PM

Better hype than mediocre, right? I'm just afraid that Cassel is mediocre

RustShack · 04-11-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Seattle did this, what did they win?

So to answer my question that you ignored, you take Curry over Monroe? Thank You.

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

Cassel. Is it possible he was just a product of the system?

What "system"?

Aren't all offenses systems. I say instead of taking a risk on a QB with no experience that has a less than 40% chance of succeeding in the NFL, we just run, "the system".

Wouldn't that be easier?

Is Sanchez a product of a system? Or is he instant offense?

04-11-2009, 06:45 PM
KCBOSS1 RAISE EM RIGHT Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10005366	Cassel or Sanchez? I realize that we are where we are, but the more I see about Sanchez, the more I'm afraid that a few years down the road, we may look back and realize that we passed up on the franchise guy that we've been looking for. I know that Cassel played ok last year, but is he a franchise guy? ...likely not. Thoughts?
Posts: 1,927

04-11-2009, 07:58 PM	#136
KCBOSS1 RAISE EM RIGHT Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10005366	I think that we are going to pick up solid O-linemen to fill other positions later in the draft.
Posts: 1,927

04-11-2009, 08:00 PM	#137
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-492950	Even Andre Smith who may slide some, if you want an OT your argument should be for dropping down and taking them not taking an OT at 3. Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of this draft if the Chiefs somehow were able to get into the 12-17 range while picking up several extra picks and ended up getting an OT and a Center out of this I wouldn't complain that much this is probably the year to get some starting lineman it's one of the few real strengths of the draft.
Posts: 115,244

04-11-2009, 08:00 PM	#138
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3136954	I personally would rather have the Pro Bowl LT moving our current one making him a Pro Bowl OG or RT instead of reaching on a consistent complementary ILB... __________________
Posts: 15,119

04-11-2009, 08:02 PM	#140
KCBOSS1 RAISE EM RIGHT Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10005366	No...we want both Roaf and Hutchinson
Posts: 1,927

04-11-2009, 08:02 PM	#141
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-492950	Rust isn't even thinking about it properly, they'd play LT and RT no one in this scenario plays ****ing guard.
Posts: 115,244

04-11-2009, 08:05 PM	#147
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $9382208	two things about chiefs fans that are driving me crazy right now: 1. they want to trade down for a fraction of the value of our pick 2. they want to move our first round draft pick stud rookie LT to guard...just because... two years in a row this shit franchsie won't spend a high pick on a QB but we're ok spending back to back firsts on the same position on the OL? that's how championship teams are built? McFly? and we wonder why it's been 25,000 years since our last superbowl? __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

04-11-2009, 08:06 PM	#148
KCBOSS1 RAISE EM RIGHT Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10005366	Better hype than mediocre, right? I'm just afraid that Cassel is mediocre
Posts: 1,927