Chiefs Clark Judge loves Matt Cassel, and so should you. - Page 10

ChiefsCountry · 12-02-2010, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

Rivers in the playoffs -

2006 - 0-1

2007 - 2-1

2008 - 1-1

2009 - 0-1

That's a 3-4 playoff record. So he has a losing record in the playoffs.

His combined playoff numbers -

58% completion percentage - not good

8 TD's 9 picks - not good

79 QB rating - not good

So "for the most part" he has NOT played pretty well in the playoffs.

But again, as noted by others, you love to cherry pick your stats. Rivers has been, for his career, a below average playoff QB. Fact. stfu about it.

He has lost to Brady twice and Big Ben and then last year with Sanchez. And he has beaten Manning twice. So against the true big boys he is 2-3 which in all honesty isn't too bad. Maybe Brees but Brady, Manning and Big Ben are the only QBs better than Rivers.

Hootie · 12-02-2010, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

He has lost to Brady twice and Big Ben and then last year with Sanchez. And he has beaten Manning twice. So against the true big boys he is 2-3 which in all honesty isn't too bad. Maybe Brees but Brady, Manning and Big Ben are the only QBs better than Rivers.

no one is arguing whether or not Philip Rivers is great...

but it's funny...because if we make the playoffs and Cassel plays like...say Matt Ryan two years ago in his first postseason...

"Chiefs" fans won't get over it for 4 god damn months.

Everyone gets a free pass except for any Chiefs players...it's hilarious.

Seriously...

Mecca hasn't posted in like 3 weeks...as soon as the Chiefs are eliminated we're going to have deal with him dumbass again.

If ANYONE ever lets him off the hook again...

-King- · 12-02-2010, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

Rivers in the playoffs -

2006 - 0-1

2007 - 2-1

2008 - 1-1

2009 - 0-1

That's a 3-4 playoff record. So he has a losing record in the playoffs.

His combined playoff numbers -

58% completion percentage - not good

8 TD's 9 picks - not good

79 QB rating - not good

So "for the most part" he has NOT played pretty well in the playoffs.

But again, as noted by others, you love to cherry pick your stats. Rivers has been, for his career, a below average playoff QB. Fact. stfu about it.

Oh shit!

zonachief · 11-30-2010, 07:43 PM

awesome sig patteeu

FAX · 11-30-2010, 07:45 PM

This is an utterly confounding situation. The Cassel Conundrum is a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, stuffed in a secret memo, slathered with Crisco, and jammed up Julian Assange's pee hole.

I have never before seen the Cassel I saw on Sunday. It was like watching Lazarus walk out of the tomb, join the croquet club, and hit a triple wicket.

FAX

**DeezNutz** · 11-30-2010, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX

This is an utterly confounding situation. The Cassel Conundrum is a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, stuffed in a secret memo, slathered with Crisco, and jammed up Julian Assange's pee hole.

I have never before seen the Cassel I saw on Sunday. It was like watching Lazarus walk out of the tomb, join the croquet club, and hit a triple wicket.

FAX

He's been improving all season, so I'm not sure how you could have missed this.

FAX · 11-30-2010, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

He's been improving all season, so I'm not sure how you could have missed this.

I think I've watched every game. I've never seen a performance like that out of Cassel, though.

Maybe I shouldn't have been hiding under the bed. Sometimes, that can obscure one's vision.

FAX

**Ming the Merciless** · 11-30-2010, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX

Maybe I shouldn't have been hiding under the bed. Sometimes, that can obscure one's vision.

**DeezNutz** · 11-30-2010, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX

I think I've watched every game. I've never seen a performance like that out of Cassel, though.

Yep. Couldn't agree more.

**007** · 11-30-2010, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX

This is an utterly confounding situation. The Cassel Conundrum is a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, stuffed in a secret memo, slathered with Crisco, and jammed up Julian Assange's pee hole.

I have never before seen the Cassel I saw on Sunday. It was like watching Lazarus walk out of the tomb, join the croquet club, and hit a triple wicket.

FAX

you are one messed up MF. And I mean that in a good way.

Marcellus · 11-30-2010, 08:30 PM

I have to say the difference in the debate about Cassel in this thread compared to week 4 of the season for example, is encouraging.

SenselessChiefsFan · 11-30-2010, 09:07 PM

Since Cassel has been here, I have stayed about the same. I felt like he was a mid level QB. Probably 10-15th in the league.... basically, Mark Sanchez.

I have admitted that I underestimated Sanchez. He has impressed me in many, many ways.

I seem to have underestimated Cassel as well. Time will tell if he is just having a good season, or if this is permanent. I mean, Anderson had a pro bowl year in Cleveland. We know how this stuff can go at times.

I am waiting for the other shoe to drop. I still struggle to believe he is AS good as he has played. But, at some point, we are just going to have to accept that he is a 'good' qb, even if he is never a 'great' qb.

**jjchieffan** · 11-30-2010, 09:28 PM

He's not the first to brag on Cassel. I don't remember the games, but in one, the announcers were comparing his throwing motion to Elway,(He wasn't playing good then, I about spit my drink threw my nose when they said it) and then, just a couple of weeks ago, they were comparing his footwork to Drew Brees. I think Gannon was one of the announcers.

kcxiv · 11-30-2010, 09:30 PM

the thing with Brady Manning and Orton is they dont have good run games. At least nothing close to what the Chiefs have. Indy and Denver i know for a fact have crappy running games. Not to sure on N.E, but since Danny Woodhead is their running back, i am sure its pretty much all Tom. We have a running back that is doing something that no one since what Jim Brown is doing with a 6.2 ypc.

We have another demension them teams dont have right now imo. Are they going to stack the box are are they going to double on Bowe? hmmm..

zonachief · 12-01-2010, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv

the thing with Brady Manning and Orton is they dont have good run games. At least nothing close to what the Chiefs have. Indy and Denver i know for a fact have crappy running games. Not to sure on N.E, but since Danny Woodhead is their running back, i am sure its pretty much all Tom. We have a running back that is doing something that no one since what Jim Brown is doing with a 6.2 ypc.

We have another demension them teams dont have right now imo. Are they going to stack the box are are they going to double on Bowe? hmmm..

Brady has BenJarvus Green-Ellis. Who is top 5 in rushing TD's.

11-30-2010, 07:43 PM	#4
zonachief Starter Join Date: Nov 2010 Casino cash: $10004955	awesome sig patteeu
Posts: 439

11-30-2010, 07:45 PM	#5
FAX testing ... 1, 2, 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tennessee Casino cash: $6753759	This is an utterly confounding situation. The Cassel Conundrum is a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, stuffed in a secret memo, slathered with Crisco, and jammed up Julian Assange's pee hole. I have never before seen the Cassel I saw on Sunday. It was like watching Lazarus walk out of the tomb, join the croquet club, and hit a triple wicket. FAX
Posts: 44,492

11-30-2010, 08:30 PM	#11
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $-447338	I have to say the difference in the debate about Cassel in this thread compared to week 4 of the season for example, is encouraging.
Posts: 74,362

11-30-2010, 09:07 PM	#12
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	Since Cassel has been here, I have stayed about the same. I felt like he was a mid level QB. Probably 10-15th in the league.... basically, Mark Sanchez. I have admitted that I underestimated Sanchez. He has impressed me in many, many ways. I seem to have underestimated Cassel as well. Time will tell if he is just having a good season, or if this is permanent. I mean, Anderson had a pro bowl year in Cleveland. We know how this stuff can go at times. I am waiting for the other shoe to drop. I still struggle to believe he is AS good as he has played. But, at some point, we are just going to have to accept that he is a 'good' qb, even if he is never a 'great' qb. __________________ A bad day at the gym is better than a good day on the Couch.
Posts: 5,540

11-30-2010, 09:28 PM	#13
jjchieffan Supporter Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Highlandville, MO Casino cash: $-57752	He's not the first to brag on Cassel. I don't remember the games, but in one, the announcers were comparing his throwing motion to Elway,(He wasn't playing good then, I about spit my drink threw my nose when they said it) and then, just a couple of weeks ago, they were comparing his footwork to Drew Brees. I think Gannon was one of the announcers. __________________ Genesis 1:1 In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth. Following the historical accounts and the genealogy from that point on, the age of the Earth is approximately 6000-7000 years old. The Big Bullshit Theory is a lie. It and the evolution theory go against real science. Satan has used our public school system to brainwash everyone into believing these lies. Be not decieved.
Posts: 13,345

11-30-2010, 09:30 PM	#14
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8697996	the thing with Brady Manning and Orton is they dont have good run games. At least nothing close to what the Chiefs have. Indy and Denver i know for a fact have crappy running games. Not to sure on N.E, but since Danny Woodhead is their running back, i am sure its pretty much all Tom. We have a running back that is doing something that no one since what Jim Brown is doing with a 6.2 ypc. We have another demension them teams dont have right now imo. Are they going to stack the box are are they going to double on Bowe? hmmm..
Posts: 29,111