***OFFICIAL Walterfootball.com Mock Draft Thread*** - Page 12

**The Franchise** · 12-16-2010, 10:26 AM

He updates his mock draft like once a week.....so I'll just post them when I see them.

http://www.walterfootball.com/draft2011.php

_______________________________________________________________

Quote:

#23 - Kansas City Chiefs: Jonathan Baldwin, WR, Pittsburgh

A list of players who have lined up across from Dwayne Bowe this season: Chris Chambers, Terrance Copper and Verran Tucker. Bleh.

Jonathan Baldwin has struggled this year amid quarterbacking issues, but he's still a physical freak at 6-5, 230.

Quote:

#54 - Kansas City Chiefs: Jabaal Sheard, DE/OLB, Pittsburgh

The Chiefs have only one reliable pass-rusher. Adding a solid complement across from Tamba Hali would take Kansas City's defense to the next level.

Quote:

#87 - Kansas City Chiefs: Christian Ballard, DE/DT, Iowa

The Chiefs could use some help up front; they've struggled against the run lately after a great start to the season in that department.

Chiefnj2 · 03-29-2011, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

We've seen teams over the last 2 or 3 drafts ignoring the chart because the cost of signing high draft picks has become so ridiculous.

Part of it is money. Part of it is the conservative nature of GMs and Coaches who don't want to be the fall guy for moving up for a player that ends up busting.

I can't think of one team that was really set back because of the money given to rookies. Your set back because you missed adding a great player and you have a big hole, not really because of the money. The Lions were set back because they grabbed (mostly sub par) receivers and nothing else. The Raiders were set back because they missed on Russell. KC missed on Sims. None of those teams were really hampered by salary cap restraints.

Bewbies · 03-29-2011, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Part of it is money. Part of it is the conservative nature of GMs and Coaches who don't want to be the fall guy for moving up for a player that ends up busting.

I can't think of one team that was really set back because of the money given to rookies. Your set back because you missed adding a great player and you have a big hole, not really because of the money. The Lions were set back because they grabbed (mostly sub par) receivers and nothing else. The Raiders were set back because they missed on Russell. KC missed on Sims. None of those teams were really hampered by salary cap restraints.

Didn't we offer Detroit our #3 overall pick in exchange for their 2nd rounder and they said no? I'm sure that had nothing to do with money.

Chiefnj2 · 03-30-2011, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Didn't we offer Detroit our #3 overall pick in exchange for their 2nd rounder and they said no? I'm sure that had nothing to do with money.

???? Detroit had the #1 pick.

Bewbies · 03-30-2011, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

???? Detroit had the #1 pick.

Yep, they drafted Stafford and we wanted out to the top 5...they had the 21st pick too but I don't think we wanted that either.

Chiefnj2 · 03-30-2011, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Yep, they drafted Stafford and we wanted out to the top 5...they had the 21st pick too but I don't think we wanted that either.

So you are saying KC wanted to fall back into the 2nd round and give up the #3 for the 33rd pick?

Bewbies · 03-30-2011, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

So you are saying KC wanted to fall back into the 2nd round and give up the #3 for the 33rd pick?

I'm not 100% certain, but I'm pretty sure before the draft one of the network guys said we had offered our #3 pick to Detroit for peanuts. Someone else will remember I'm sure...

Urc Burry · 03-30-2011, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

I'm not 100% certain, but I'm pretty sure before the draft one of the network guys said we had offered our #3 pick to Detroit for peanuts. Someone else will remember I'm sure...

Detroit actually had pick #20, so i'm thinking it was for #20 and their second, or maybe third rounder

aturnis · 03-30-2011, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

I'm not 100% certain, but I'm pretty sure before the draft one of the network guys said we had offered our #3 pick to Detroit for peanuts. Someone else will remember I'm sure...

Yeah that is just ridiculous.

**RealSNR** · 03-30-2011, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry

Detroit actually had pick #20, so i'm thinking it was for #20 and their second, or maybe third rounder

Hey if it meant not being stuck with Tyson ****ing Jackson, I would've taken that deal.

Of course, I much rather would have stayed at 3 and taken Raji

Urc Burry · 03-30-2011, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Hey if it meant not being stuck with Tyson ****ing Jackson, I would've taken that deal.

Of course, I much rather would have stayed at 3 and taken Raji

Word.

I wanted Aaron Curry, so it kinda makes me feel better that he's not a badass..but still

**Tribal Warfare** · 03-30-2011, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Hey if it meant not being stuck with Tyson ****ing Jackson, I would've taken that deal.

Of course, I much rather would have stayed at 3 and taken Raji

or 30 other 1st rounders

ChiefsCountry · 03-30-2011, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Of course, I much rather would have stayed at 3 and taken Raji

You meant Sanchez there.

Bewbies · 03-30-2011, 07:13 PM

http://www.aolnews.com/2009/04/25/re...lions-arent-i/

This one indicates we offered the #3 overall and a 4th for the #20 and #33. Pretty even trade value there.

Am I the only guy that remembers this?

Urc Burry · 03-30-2011, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

http://www.aolnews.com/2009/04/25/re...lions-arent-i/

This one indicates we offered the #3 overall and a 4th for the #20 and #33. Pretty even trade value there.

Am I the only guy that remembers this?

Knowing that we still would of picked Tyson Jackson, that would of been the definition of trade rape

salame · 03-30-2011, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

http://www.aolnews.com/2009/04/25/re...lions-arent-i/

This one indicates we offered the #3 overall and a 4th for the #20 and #33. Pretty even trade value there.

Am I the only guy that remembers this?

No I remember it I just try not to think about who we could have had because Jackson sucks the balls

03-30-2011, 07:13 PM	#178
Bewbies Ith Fuhtbawl Time Join Date: Apr 2010 Casino cash: $9999900	http://www.aolnews.com/2009/04/25/re...lions-arent-i/ This one indicates we offered the #3 overall and a 4th for the #20 and #33. Pretty even trade value there. Am I the only guy that remembers this?
Posts: 10,085