NFL Draft Well, We Probably Should Have a Brian Orakpo Thread... - Page 15

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-09-2008, 07:08 PM

If we keep playing like this, we won't be in a position to draft Stafford. It's not good or bad, it is what it is.

With that being said, a genetic freak like Rak daddy would go a long way towards fixing the ills of this defense. He's not as long as Michael Johnson, but he's fast, explosive, and incredibly strong. Plus, he's taken boxing lessons, so Krumrie will love him with his ****tard slap-fight drill.

There could be worse selections in the 3-7 range where we will most likely choose.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

I'll reitirate once more If the BPA is a position "of great need" alright sweet, but if it's at another you got to take him because of the fact putting your absolute best players on the field.

And that works great when you aren't picking in the top five.

Furthermore:

3-4 ILBs= worthless in a cover 2

3-4 Ends=worthless in a cover 2

3-4 NT= worthless in a cover 2

Scheme matters.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

You don't even know what BPA is. You are going solely off of grades. Do you really think that a 3-4 team would taken Glenn Dorsey? Or a Cover 2 team take Vontae Davis in the top 5?

The pats drafted Seymour and he's an all-world DT playing RE with Wilfork in the middle. Great players find ways in getting on the field .

ChiefsCountry · 11-10-2008, 01:43 AM

Since this went on a 10 page BPA debate, wasnt the original reply about taking Oher if Stafford and Orakpo were gone?

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

And that works great when you aren't picking in the top five.

Glenn Dorsey

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Since this went on a 10 page BPA debate, wasnt the original reply about taking Oher if Stafford and Orakpo were gone?

It was about if Orakpo and Oher were still on the board, you would you take.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

The pats drafted Seymour and he's an all-world DT playing RE with Wilfork in the middle. Great players find ways in getting on the field .

Are you ****ing reeruned?

1) They play a 3-4.
2) Seymour is a 3-4 end, and is too small to be a consistent 3-4 NT. He can play 3 Technique in a 4-3, but not NT in a 3-4 and be a consistent clogger.
3) Seymour was drafted before Wilfork.
4) The Pats spent three first rounders on their D-Line and 1 on their o-line.

What does that tell you?

Chiefs=Champions · 11-10-2008, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

It's obvious to me that Tribal Warfare just doesn't understand what the draft is all about.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Are you ****ing reeruned?

1) They play a 3-4.
2) Seymour is a 3-4 end,/I]tell you?

He played DT at Georgia.

Ultra Peanut · 11-10-2008, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

It was about if Orakpo and Oher were still on the board, you would you take.

Also whether you would prefer cake or death.

Chiefs=Champions · 11-10-2008, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

He played DT at Georgia.

He's more of an end than a dt...

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good

He's more of an end than a dt...

Now he is but he played DT at Georgia, and if Dorsey was drafted to a 3-4 team he'd be drafted as an end also.

Mecca · 11-10-2008, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good

He's more of an end than a dt...

In a 3-4.....if he played in a 4-3 he'd be the under tackle.

Basileus777 · 11-10-2008, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Now he is but he played DT at Georgia, and if Dorsey was drafted to a 3-4 team he'd be drafted as an end also.

In a sense. But really Dorsey wouldn't be drafted by any team running a 3-4, except maybe the one-gap 3-4 schemes used in San Diego and Dallas. He doesn't have the build of a 3-4 DE, he's too short for one thing.

Chiefs=Champions · 11-10-2008, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

In a 3-4.....if he played in a 4-3 he'd be the under tackle.

I understand that.. but in my views hes more of an end from a physical standpoint...

Shh by the way i was supporting ur argument...

Chiefs=Champions · 11-10-2008, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Now he is but he played DT at Georgia, and if Dorsey was drafted to a 3-4 team he'd be drafted as an end also.

Dorsey is not an end.. to short.. Semour is built like an end.

11-09-2008, 07:08 PM
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7919572	Well, We Probably Should Have a Brian Orakpo Thread... If we keep playing like this, we won't be in a position to draft Stafford. It's not good or bad, it is what it is. With that being said, a genetic freak like Rak daddy would go a long way towards fixing the ills of this defense. He's not as long as Michael Johnson, but he's fast, explosive, and incredibly strong. Plus, he's taken boxing lessons, so Krumrie will love him with his ****tard slap-fight drill. There could be worse selections in the 3-7 range where we will most likely choose.
Posts: 74,860

11-10-2008, 01:43 AM	#213
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $1768752	Since this went on a 10 page BPA debate, wasnt the original reply about taking Oher if Stafford and Orakpo were gone?
Posts: 49,904