11 QB's under the gun in '12

[Dr. Johnny Fever]

According to Fox Sports. No story, just a link to a slide show with a paragraph about each.

Yes Castle is one of them.

Discuss.


http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/lists/q...photo=31277114

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

It's always funny when people use empathic clipart to back up an argument nobody else agrees with.

Nobody agrees with?

Pretty sure you were/are the only one saying that Cassel shouldn't be the starter with the current list of QB's on the roster.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by jd1020

Nobody agrees with?

Pretty sure you were/are the only one saying that Cassel shouldn't be the starter with the current list of QB's on the roster.

I think you need to take a look around.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I think you need to take a look around.

.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I never said we had an elite QB.

I've said there is one QB who is definitively not the answer. And two guys who have an outside shot of being the answer, and a decent shot at being better than Cassel.

You're acting like they have some big bar to cross. No. They have to prove to be better than Matt Cassel. And with a few games under the belt, that is absolutely achievable.

Why do they have to be an elite QB to justify replacing a mediocre QB with no upside?

And why do you insist that these backups with few snaps to prove they're worthless have a huge mountain to climb to replace a starter with a million snaps that proves definitively that he's worthless?

They have to show SOMETHING in practice and so far Stanzi hasn't done that. How hard is that to understand?

He doesn't have to be all-world. He just has to flash enough to get them to say "wow, we should run him with the 1's just to see".

In camp, he would follow every sweet touch pass with a pick, kind of like his junior year at Iowa. He's not doing enough to WARRANT getting a look at this point, plain and simple.