Gasoline at $4 Coming to a Pump Near You, Unfazed by Rising Tab

[Donger]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=afOlUzd30YOo

Pretty alarmist, IMO, but possible.

Spoiler!

April 23 (Bloomberg) -- Whether it's $50 to fill up your Prius or $130 for the Ford Expedition, $4-a-gallon gasoline is coming to a pump near you.

Fuel prices are rising at a pace not seen since Hurricanes Katrina and Rita knocked out a third of the U.S. oil refining industry in 2005. Gasoline consumption is climbing twice as fast as last year and will accelerate when summer travel begins late next month.

``What we're surprised by is the increased demand,'' said James Mulva, chief executive officer at ConocoPhillips, whose refineries from California to New Jersey produce 56 million gallons of gas a day, enough to meet 14 percent of the country's needs. ``Even though the price of gasoline is up, the demand is up,'' he said in an April 12 interview in Houston.

Population gains and U.S. economic growth are causing an increase in fuel purchases, according to Orlando, Florida-based AAA, the nation's largest organization for motorists. The U.S. economy will expand at a 2.4 percent annual pace in the second quarter, up from 1.8 percent in the first three months, according to the median estimate of 74 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Gasoline use is rising almost 5 percent above the five-year average.

Americans are resigned to higher prices, says David Pursell, a principal with Pickering Energy Partners, a consulting firm in Houston.

``Last year, we had pump prices well over $3 for the summer and gasoline demand was up,'' Pursell said in an interview. ``Would $4 gasoline cause demand contraction? I think it will, but I also thought $3 gasoline would.''

Pump Prices

Gasoline inventories, measured by the days of demand they will cover, are at the lowest level in two decades for this time of year because of refinery fires, power failures and maintenance work oil companies failed to complete in 2006. No new U.S. refinery has been built in three decades, increasing the strain on existing plants.

Pump prices in the U.S. may increase to $4 a gallon from a nationwide average of $2.87 today, especially if hurricanes threaten Gulf of Mexico refineries, says Peter Beutel, an analyst at Cameron Hanover Inc. in Stamford, Connecticut, who helps industrial consumers manage energy costs.

``Hurricanes are always the huge wild card,'' said Beutel. ``We're all praying for a year like 2006 rather than 2005.''

The June-to-November Atlantic Ocean hurricane season may produce 17 tropical storms, with nine reaching hurricane force and four becoming major hurricanes whose winds exceed 111 miles per hour (179 kilometers per hour), London-based forecasters at Tropical Storm Risk said. Some of the storms will strike the Gulf Coast this year after a benign 2006, AccuWeather.com predicted.

Inflation Risk

Higher pump prices will make winners of refinery owners such as ConocoPhillips, San Antonio-based Valero Energy Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell Plc of The Hague. Shares of Valero and Sunoco Inc., whose only business is refining, are rebounding after a decline at the end of last summer.

The increase in fuel costs threatens to quicken inflation and restrain consumer spending in the U.S. An appreciation to $4 a gallon would add more than $10 for a driver who fills the 12- gallon tank of a Toyota Motor Corp. Prius. The owner of an Expedition, a Ford Motor Co. sport-utility vehicle with a 34- gallon capacity, faces an increase of almost $40.

Many Americans have no choice but to drive more, says Christopher Knittel, an economist who studies fuel consumption at the University of California in Davis.

More Commuters

``We live farther from our jobs than we did in the 1970s, and with the rise of dual-income households, we now have two people who drive those distances every day,'' Knittel said.

Consumers also do more driving for things such as taking children to soccer practice, which they are unlikely to quit, he said. The U.S. population has increased 1 percent a year in the past decade to 301 million in 2007, adding to demand for gasoline, economists said.

Rising fuel prices make it less likely that Federal Reserve policy makers, who have cited inflation risks for the past year, will cut interest rates to spur economic growth. Before the hurricane-induced peak in 2005, U.S. gasoline topped out at $1.42 a gallon in March 1981, or $3.21 when adjusted for inflation, according to the Energy Department.

Economies in Europe and Asia are less likely to be hurt by gasoline prices because fuel already is subject to high taxes designed to encourage conservation. A gallon of unleaded costs about 3.25 pounds a gallon ($6.49) in the U.K., and in Japan it's 130.3 yen per liter ($4.16 a gallon).

$4 Barrier

U.S. consumers will get little relief on gasoline prices from Europe this year, unlike 2005, when oil companies shipped more across the Atlantic after the hurricanes. Europe's gasoline inventories in February were 114.2 million barrels, down 11 percent from two years earlier, according to the International Energy Agency in Paris. The drop in Europe was almost twice the 5.7 percent decline in U.S. supplies in that time.

``Just as we used to think $3 a gallon was an impenetrable barrier, now it's $4,'' said Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business in College Park and former chief economist for the U.S. International Trade Commission. Gasoline at $3.50 is likely, Morici said, and a conflict with Iran or any event that disrupts crude supplies may push it to $4.

Pump prices rose 33 percent in the past 11 weeks, the fastest rate of gain since a six-week, 34 percent rally to the record $3.069 in September 2005, Energy Department data show.

Bodman's `Worry'

U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman in an interview last week said the national average pump price could break the record this summer. While his agency's official forecast is for gasoline to peak next month at about where it is today, hurricanes, refinery closures or crude oil supply cuts may send prices higher, he said.

Higher prices are ``a legitimate worry,'' Bodman said. ``We have trouble spots all over the world'' that could boost crude oil prices. ``We're in a very tight situation.''

Spending on fuel in the U.S. consumes half as much household income as in the early 1980s, which means gasoline would need to reach almost $6 a gallon to have the same effect on the economy as in 1981, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Storage tanks at U.S. refineries, terminals and ports hold enough gasoline to cover almost 22 days of domestic demand, 8.2 percent less than the five-year average and the lowest for this time of year since the 1980s, Energy Department figures show.

Shortages

Valero-owned filling stations in Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado, ran dry after a Feb. 16 explosion and fire shut the company's McKee refinery in Sunray, Texas. A day earlier, a blaze at an Exxon Mobil Corp. plant in Nanticoke, Ontario, slashed output, resulting in shortages and higher prices across eastern Canada.

The McKee shutdown strained supplies so much that ConocoPhillips postponed maintenance at its Borger, Texas, refinery north of Amarillo to prevent shortages in the region.

``Refineries are becoming more complex,'' Mulva said in the Houston interview. ``What we're finding is it's more difficult keeping reliability up with more sophisticated pieces of equipment that are highly integrated.''

Tesoro Corp. of San Antonio, the second-largest refiner in the western U.S., said first-quarter refinery use dropped because oil companies delayed until this year maintenance that could have been done in 2006. The portion of U.S. refining capacity that was in operation in the first quarter declined to 87.3 percent from 88.9 percent a year earlier, according to Energy Department data.

`Refineries Blow Up'

``Prices will depend entirely on whether we have a couple of refineries blow up,'' said Philip K. Verleger, an economist who runs a consulting firm in Newport Beach, California. ``It's almost impossible we'll get to $4 a gallon if all the refineries run well this summer. But if something happens and there are problems, then anything's possible.''

The average share gain for Valero, Tesoro and six other oil-refining companies is 26 percent this year, outperforming the 4.1 percent gain for Exxon Mobil and a 4.7 percent increase for the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

The shares will continue to rally, said Paul Carlson, who helps manage $3 billion at HGK Asset Management in Jersey City, New Jersey.

``Refiners are doing very well these days,'' said Carlson, whose holdings include ConocoPhillips, the second-biggest U.S. refiner. ``There will be lots of demand for any new refining stocks.''

`Back in Favor'

As recently as August, investors were selling oil refiners on concern an economic slowdown would slash fuel demand in the U.S., the world's largest energy market. During seven weeks last August and September, Valero shares fell 29 percent, wiping out $12 billion in market value.

``Refining is very much back in favor,'' said Douglas Ober, who helps oversee $2.3 billion at Baltimore-based Adams Express Co. ``Even with higher prices, we haven't seen any substantial cutback in demand. They're cranking out as much of this stuff as they can, and we're throwing it in our tanks as fast as we can.''

The margin earned from processing crude oil into fuels rose to $24.68 a barrel on April 11, the highest since right after the hurricanes in September 2005. The margin has since retreated to $22.12 a barrel, still about double the five-year average.

``It'll be a fairly tight gasoline market all through the summer,'' said Robert Hinckley, an analyst at Rochdale Securities in New York.

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by Donger

Okay. I'm glad that aren't entirely opposed to nuclear. Just as an example, here are some numbers:

Wind farm near Salina
Covers 12,000 acres
Generates 100 MW

Wolf Creek
Covers about three acres
Generates 1,100 MW

We'll utilize oil until something else comes along that is as efficient in terms of both economics and physics.

Glad we agree on that. I just we think we should do it before it runs out and we're fucked. Surely you can agree with that.

I'm aware that solar is fairly limited, (I trust your #'s without asking for a source), from what I understand Geothermal is where we get the most self renewing source of energy. But supplementing it with clean stuff too like solar, wind and wave wouldn't hurt.

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by Donger

So you want to cover the entire country with solar panels, wind farms and our entire coast(s) with wave generation?

The entire country/coastline? Of course not. But some of it sure.

Like I said before, Geothermal, based on what I've read from scientific studies, it the one's that's gonna save us from out dependcy on oil, if the politicians filling their pockets worldwide with Big Oils profits ever allow us. And again, I'm not smart enough to tell you why, but I know science has more than enough proof it can be done.

You'd prefer a clean, self sustaining renewable engery resouce like Geothermal over Oil and Nuclear for you and your children and children's children if possible, wouldn't you? I know I would.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

Glad we agree on that. I just we think we should do it before it runs out and we're fucked. Surely you can agree with that.

I'm aware that solar is fairly limited, (I trust your #'s without asking for a source), from what I understand Geothermal is where we get the most self renewing source of energy. But supplementing it with clean stuff too like solar, wind and wave wouldn't hurt.

Renewable energy is great as a supplement, but it's folly to think that it will meet our power needs now, let alone if we switched all our hydrocarbon-fueled vehicles to EV.

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by Donger

Renewable energy is great as a supplement, but it's folly to think that it will meet our power needs now, let alone if we switched all our hydrocarbon-fueled vehicles to EV.

Agree 100 percent. But the sooner we get to it, the better off we'll be. Why put off tommorrow what we can start today?

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

The entire country/coastline? Of course not. But some of it sure.

Like I said before, Geothermal, based on what I've read from scientific studies, it the one's that's gonna save us from out dependcy on oil, if the politicians filling their pockets worldwide with Big Oils profits ever allow us. And again, I'm not smart enough to tell you why, but I know science has more than enough proof it can be done.

You'd prefer a clean, self sustaining renewable engery resouce like Geothermal over Oil and Nuclear for you and your children and children's children if possible, wouldn't you? I know I would.

Geothermal potential nationwide is something like 125,000 MW, which is about 25% of what we use right now.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

Agree 100 percent. But the sooner we get to it, the better off we'll be. Why put off tommorrow what we can start today?

We ARE doing it right now. Look at this graph:

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by Donger

We ARE doing it right now. Look at this graph:

Fantastic! I still think geothermal is the way to go, that's what all the experts (that give a crap) say. And it's research is FAR from being properly funded and therefore researched. Who would have thought just 6 years ago it could generate 25 percent of our energy? I bet as science advances (and people get fed up with self serving politicians) it could mean even more than that.

Thanks for the graph.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

I wish it were that far away.

You know, they find new pockets of crude and natural gas fairly regularly.

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by Jules Winnfield

You know, they find new pockets of crude and natural gas fairly regularly.

Of course, but not 100 yrs worth. Donger seems to know far about energy than I do, and he didn't agree with you, which means you were probably wrong.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

Of course, but not 100 yrs worth. Donger seems to know far about energy than I do, and he didn't agree with you, which means you were probably wrong.

Where is the post where he disagrees with me?

[Backwards Masking]

i never said there was. but he and i were arguing when you posted that and he didn't say anything, so i'm assuming he didn't agree. i'm sure he'll be along soon enough to confirm things!

[BigMeatballDave]

I just don't believe we will ever completely run out of crude. Its not like there was a set amount placed there several million years ago.

FWIW, I would love to see us drastically cut back on crude consumption and focus on alternatives.

[The Franchise]

$3.59

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

i never said there was. but he and i were arguing when you posted that and he didn't say anything, so i'm assuming he didn't agree. i'm sure he'll be along soon enough to confirm things!

If Donger saw my post and did not agree he certainly would have commented.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

i never said there was. but he and i were arguing when you posted that and he didn't say anything, so i'm assuming he didn't agree. i'm sure he'll be along soon enough to confirm things!

100 years is probably realistic, but no one knows for certain. It's not 25 years, though.