Would the Chiefs beat Texas?

[Hootie]

how about this...

If Thigpen was Texas' QB, would they be undefeated?

Or...

If the Chiefs offense lead by Thigpen replaced Texas' offense...would they be totally unstoppable?

Herm and his staff would replace Texas', obviously.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Hootie

how about this...

If Thigpen was Texas' QB, would they be undefeated?

Or...

If the Chiefs offense lead by Thigpen replaced Texas' offense...would they be totally unstoppable?

Herm and his staff would replace Texas', obviously.

Yes.

They would score 100 points a game.

You really don't watch college football, do you?

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Yes.

They would score 100 points a game.

You really don't watch college football, do you?

No, not really.

[Molitoth]

I honestly think Texas would win.

[RustShack]

Originally Posted by Molitoth

I honestly think Texas would win.

I honestly think your a douche.

[Sure-Oz]

edit i thought Texans

[RustShack]

Every player on our team was one of the best if not the best players on their college team. The majority of any college team wont even make an NFL roster, not to mention start for one.

[Gonzo]

Stupid thread. Texas could not beat the Lions. You're talking about a team which has the potential of having about 25-35% of their players actually playing in the NFL vs. a team that has players on it that were all good enough, (except Thigpen) to be signed to an NFL team. All be it a shitty one, your still talking about the best players in the country.

[InChiefsHeaven]

This is a stupid question. The NFL is made up of the best of the best athletes in the world...not many Rookies light the world on fire their first year in the NFL...now imagine an NFL team coming in to play any college team...experience, speed, complexity...advantage NFL...

...it wouldn't even be close. Chiefs would annihilate any college team.

...it's a stupid question.

[Molitoth]

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell

This is a stupid question. The NFL is made up of the best of the best athletes in the world...not many Rookies light the world on fire their first year in the NFL...now imagine an NFL team coming in to play any college team...experience, speed, complexity...advantage NFL...

...it wouldn't even be close. Chiefs would annihilate any college team.

...it's a stupid question.

You overestimate Herm's coaching.

[Hootie]

So an offense consisting of...

QB: Thigpen
RB: Smith
RB2: Charles
FB: Cox
WR: Bowe
WR2: Darling
WR3: Webb
WR4: Franklin
TE: Cottam
LT: Albert
LG: Waters
C: Niswanger
RG: Jones
RT: McIntosh

That would put up a 100 a game? I left out LJ and Tony Gonzalez to make it somewhat realistic...

I'm just wondering if Chan Gailey turns that offense into a juggernaut/can't lose/100 points per game/unfair to the rest of college football type offense...because that would surprise me since outside of Bowe and Albert it consists of a bunch of 3rd-7th round caliber players.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Hootie

So an offense consisting of...

QB: Thigpen
RB: Smith
RB2: Charles
FB: Cox
WR: Bowe
WR2: Darling
WR3: Webb
WR4: Franklin
TE: Cottam
LT: Albert
LG: Waters
C: Niswanger
RG: Jones
RT: McIntosh

That would put up a 100 a game? I left out LJ and Tony Gonzalez to make it somewhat realistic...

I'm just wondering if Chan Gailey turns that offense into a juggernaut/can't lose/100 points per game/unfair to the rest of college football type offense...because that would surprise me since outside of Bowe and Albert it consists of a bunch of 3rd-7th round caliber players.

You just don't understand the difference in speed and size between college and the NFL. That's not to mention execution.

They would put up a 100 every game easily. Easily.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

You just don't understand the difference in speed and size between college and the NFL. That's not to mention execution.

They would put up a 100 every game easily. Easily.

That team I just listed?

I say if you take Waters off that team, there is no possible way they'd be as good as you're making them out to be.

I don't care how slow a defense might be...Thigpen would be what, the 10th best QB in the Big 12? Smith and Charles wouldn't be the best RB's in college football...

You can't tell me that offense listed is better than the USC offense the year Texas beat them in the National Championship game.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Hootie

That team I just listed?

I say if you take Waters off that team, there is no possible way they'd be as good as you're making them out to be.

I don't care how slow a defense might be...Thigpen would be what, the 10th best QB in the Big 12? Smith and Charles wouldn't be the best RB's in college football...

You can't tell me that offense listed is better than the USC offense the year Texas beat them in the National Championship game.

Who was their #1 Receiver: Dwayne Jarrett. What has he done so far in the NFL? Nothing.
Who was their #2 Receiver: Steve Smith: What has he done? Play a little slot.

Their offensive line had 3 NFL caliber players on it: Kalil, Rachal, and Baker, but let's also remember that none of them received any NFL coaching yet, nor have they ever lined up against someone who would command a double team on every play, let alone a line full of players who would command one on every play.

USC has better running backs, period. But they aren't going to have anywhere to run.

Leinart's receivers aren't going to have any separation. His tight ends are going to get swallowed.

Do you have any idea the kind of havoc that a D-Line of Tamba Hali, Glenn Dorsey, Tank Tyler, and Turk McBride would wreak on a college line?

It's just obnoxiously stupid.

I don't think people realize how open college receivers are. Go watch an Oklahoma game, or the Texas-Mizzou game, or USC when Leinart was there. It's not difficult to throw to a guy who is just running free--it's really not.

That's why Kliff Kingsbury, Timmy Chang, and Graham Harrell can put up 10K yards and can't even catch on to a ****ing practice squad.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Who was their #1 Receiver: Dwayne Jarrett. What has he done so far in the NFL? Nothing.
Who was their #2 Receiver: Steve Smith: What has he done? Play a little slot.

Their offensive line had 3 NFL caliber players on it: Kalil, Rachal, and Baker, but let's also remember that none of them received any NFL coaching yet, nor have they ever lined up against someone who would command a double team on every play, let alone a line full of players who would command one on every play.

USC has better running backs, period. But they aren't going to have anywhere to run.

Leinart's receivers aren't going to have any separation. His tight ends are going to get swallowed.

Do you have any idea the kind of havoc that a D-Line of Tamba Hali, Glenn Dorsey, Tank Tyler, and Turk McBride would wreak on a college line?

It's just obnoxiously stupid.

I don't think people realize how open college receivers are. Go watch an Oklahoma game, or the Texas-Mizzou game, or USC when Leinart was there. It's not difficult to throw to a guy who is just running free--it's really not.

That's why Kliff Kingsbury, Timmy Chang, and Graham Harrell can put up 10K yards and can't even catch on to a ****ing practice squad.

I don't get what you're doing right now...

I just friggin' said I'm not talking about defense anymore. I understand the Chiefs defense would dominate any college offense. I get it.

I'm talking strictly offense...I've said this to you for the last 5 posts...

That USC offense had to be better than the Chiefs current offense. As of now, we have LJ/Tony Gonzalez/Bowe and Waters...everyone else is a 'never was' with little coaching as well.

And Leinart is so much better than Thigpen it is sickening. I think the Chiefs would be better from here on out with Todd friggin' Reesing at QB over Tyler Thigpen.