|
![]() |
#3031 |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
Good, that would be a terrible deal for them. I don't see any reason to trade Travis Snider at this point.
And I'm not even sure why Greinke would want to play for the Jays next year...they are a 85 win team in a division where you need at least 95 wins. |
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3032 |
.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Casino cash: $57156239
|
There is very good reason to believe that this will be a down year for the AL East. If the Blue Jays EVER want to make a run at the division, they arguably have to go for it now.
__________________
|
Posts: 36,130
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3033 | |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
Quote:
The Jays need to go for it when their top prospects are in their primes and when the wealthiest ownership in baseball is prepared to put money into the team, and neither of those things will happen before next season. Considering they just traded one of their best pitchers for a 20 year old prospect, contending in 2011 obviously isn't in the plans. |
|
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3034 |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
Also, how exactly is Greinke's presence supposed to turn a 85 win team into a 95 win team? Talk about your futile trades.
|
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3035 |
.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Casino cash: $57156239
|
If the Blue Jays do nothing, they likely hand the division over to the Red Sox, but this is a winnable division. I dispute the argument that the AL East will obviously require 95 wins next year. Maybe it will, but its not obvious, and Greinke can certainly turn them into a 90-win team. Once you are there, a little bit of luck to slightly outperform your pythag is all you need.
The reason why Tampa Bay will fall back is obvious. The Yankee lineup is getting seriously old at this point, and Petitte will likely retire. If the Blue Jays dont think they can match the Red Sox, thats fine but I would be pissed as a Blue Jay fan. It makes sense for the Royals to hoard their prospects and not care about 2011, but when you do get within striking distance you have to go for it. As the old saying goes, "prospects are nice, but flags fly forever."
__________________
|
Posts: 36,130
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3036 | ||
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
Quote:
Toronto's team just isn't built to contend right now in the way that those teams are. It makes far more sense for Greinke to go somewhere that can actually benefit from his presence in 2011 like Texas. Quote:
And I'm always pissed as a Jays fan, but I resided myself that Rogers isn't prepared to seriously contend for a while. The Marcum deal should be a sign that the window for contention is more like 2013 and beyond. |
||
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3037 | |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Quote:
Me thinks you're overvaluing Snider a bit. If you could get Greinke for Drabek and Snider, the only people who should be pissed are Royals fans. "the window for contention is more like 2013 and beyond"? Didn't know you were a Royals fan, too. Welcome aboard. |
|
Posts: 47,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3038 | ||
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3039 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
And the numbers support the inversion. Wait.
|
Posts: 47,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3040 |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
They do. Greinke's 2009 season looks entirely like an aberration and Snider is undoubtedly one of the top young outfielders in baseball. What would possibly compel the Jays to trade someone like that for a pitcher (something they already have in incredible excess)?
|
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3041 |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
A pitcher, I should add, who would only be under control for two years. Two years in which they aren't going to contend, anyway.
|
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3042 | |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Quote:
While I agree that top position players are more important than top pitchers, Snider is a LONG way from establishing himself in the former. Greinke, however, is a known quantity in the latter. Arguing otherwise is silly. Even on a complete shit team (for years), he's been a stud. Timing is a completely different issue and could be absolutely valid for making it a stupid trade for Toronto. |
|
Posts: 47,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3043 | ||
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
If there is such a thing, the Jays have it. What they need is offense, and in particular, cheap, young offense.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3044 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
So grienkes 2009 is an aberration, but is undoubtedly one of the best youngs huh ?
Posted via Mobile Device |
Posts: 55,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3045 |
Perpetual Mediocrity
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $1672783
|
|
Posts: 57,771
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|