Chiefs To the drafturbators... - Page 24

Hootie · 09-13-2010, 11:23 PM

**** you guys!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

we won because...

?

2010 draft class.

AND

Mark Sanchez?

He almost makes Matt Cassel look good!

(Nah, that's an exaggeration!)

Hahahahahahaha!!!

What a great feeling.

CLOUD
9

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

And while we're at it, who are the "Drafturbators" who said that the Chiefs had no chance to win?

Dane for 1.

I am paraphrasing but he said "Why won't the Chargers win by 30".

chiefsnorth · 09-14-2010, 11:47 AM

Pioli, Haley, et al.'s detractors here are so violent and vitriolic in the expression of their opposition to the front office that it should be no surprise that the more optimistic will use this opportunity to give some back.

**Reaper16** · 09-14-2010, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I think we agree here. I'm acting on the assumption that the FO didn't like Clausen or Cody as players. To draft them just because we need a QB and NT would have been short-term thinking.

My dream draft would have been Berry, Cody, Clausen for the reasons you mentioned. If the FO don't like them, they made decisions in the best long-term interest of the team.
Its hard for me to fault them for adding that kind of speed. Those rookies were as good as I've ever seen a draft class be right out of the gate. What did we have, something like 6 players with a real impact in that game?

Yeah, it seems pretty clear that the front office didn't like Clausen or Cody (or Linval Jospeh or Torell Troup). Because you have to think that the front office recognized a deficit in the NT position at least (I can understand for political reasons why a QB wouldn't be considered).

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth

Pioli, Haley, et al.'s detractors here are so violent and vitriolic in the expression of their opposition to the front office that it should be no surprise that the more optimistic will use this opportunity to give some back.

Rep. That pretty much sums up CP's vibe.

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Yeah, it seems pretty clear that the front office didn't like Clausen or Cody (or Linval Jospeh or Torell Troup). Because you have to think that the front office recognized a deficit in the NT position at least (I can understand for political reasons why a QB wouldn't be considered).

Depends on how Smith works out. He had a good game.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Dane for 1.

I am paraphrasing but he said "Why won't the Chargers win by 30".

Yeah, I didn't think they had a chance to win. I was wrong. BFD.

But I guess that counts as Federal Holiday in the minds of some, so be it.

So, who are these "Drafturbators" that thought the Chiefs had a shitty draft?

**Reaper16** · 09-14-2010, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I won $1500 imaginary dollars in the gambling challenge thread by betting on the Chiefs.

Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Yeah, I didn't think they had a chance to win. I was wrong. BFD.

But I guess that counts as Federal Holiday in the minds of some, so be it.

So, who are these "Drafturbators" that thought the Chiefs had a shitty draft?

You are wrong more than you will admit. If you weren't so ****ing confident in every single opinion you have it wouldn't be as big of a deal or as fun to point out when you are wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Seriously? After the Berry pick almost everything was questioned except Asamoah.

-King- · 09-14-2010, 11:56 AM

I give Dane his credit. He did like the draft from the get go. He said it was a good draft and even argued with fellow drafturbators about it
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."

Look even some of the draftobators knew we had a chance to win.

I am pretty sure Mecca along with Dane predicted an epic blowout. 2 of the more vocal draftobators.

-King- · 09-14-2010, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."

Dude sorry. You're not a drafturbators.
Posted via Mobile Device

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

You are wrong more than you will admit.

Bullshit.

When I'm wrong, I've happily admitted that I was wrong because 90% of the time, it's what's best for the Chiefs organization.

Unfortunately, that's been rare as of late. Hopefully, the tide is turning.

Marcellus · 09-14-2010, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

I give Dane his credit. He did like the draft from the get go. He said it was a good draft and even argued with fellow drafturbators about it
Posted via Mobile Device

Yea, Dane was actually fairly complimentary of the draft.

Problem with grouping people is when they have differences in opinion they get offended when the group is called out.

No difference than all the dumbass "True Fan" references.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Look even some of the draftobators knew we had a chance to win.

I am pretty sure Mecca along with Dane predicted an epic blowout. 2 of the more vocal draftobators.

So, is Drafturbator a derogatory term? If not, what is it?

I never once criticized this draft. As a matter of fact, I LOVED it and defended it vehemently this offseason.

chiefsnorth · 09-14-2010, 11:59 AM

What is the definition of a draft tabulator?

I get that the people involved are those who want to burn alive anyone who largely agrees with what Pioli is doing, but what does it have to do with the draft or with turbation?

09-13-2010, 11:23 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	To the drafturbators... **** you guys! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA we won because... ? 2010 draft class. AND Mark Sanchez? He almost makes Matt Cassel look good! (Nah, that's an exaggeration!) Hahahahahahaha!!! What a great feeling. CLOUD 9
Posts: 56,356

09-14-2010, 11:47 AM	#347
chiefsnorth Veteran Join Date: Apr 2010 Casino cash: $10004900	Pioli, Haley, et al.'s detractors here are so violent and vitriolic in the expression of their opposition to the front office that it should be no surprise that the more optimistic will use this opportunity to give some back.
Posts: 1,808

09-14-2010, 11:56 AM	#354
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1224257	I give Dane his credit. He did like the draft from the get go. He said it was a good draft and even argued with fellow drafturbators about it Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 65,458

09-14-2010, 11:59 AM	#360
chiefsnorth Veteran Join Date: Apr 2010 Casino cash: $10004900	What is the definition of a draft tabulator? I get that the people involved are those who want to burn alive anyone who largely agrees with what Pioli is doing, but what does it have to do with the draft or with turbation?
Posts: 1,808