FBI MOSTED WANTED!!!!

[Halfcan]

Warren Steed Jeffs-Morman leader with 80 wives and 250 kids has been caught!!!!

Busted in Las Vegas on a traffic stop. He was #1 since 2005 when he became a fugitive.

Do you think it is okay to have 80 wives???

[Jilly]

Originally Posted by Halfcan

How did this FBI thread get turned into a Tampon thread???

no shit....all of a sudden it was all intellectual, interrupting my 80 husban ds fantasy....

- I'd learn to be an expert at Madden
- I'd definitely have enough knowledge for the FF draft
- I'm sure one would be a metrosexual and could go shopping for me to pick out my clothes since I hate it.


Oh the list goes on forever...

[UTChief]

He is not a Morman he is from Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of laterday saints There is a difference, he use to be a morman untill he was excamunicated. morman religion dont practice poligamy.

[Halfcan]

Originally Posted by UTChief

He is not a Morman he is from Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of laterday saints There is a difference, he use to be a morman untill he was excamunicated. morman religion dont practice poligamy.

On the show Big Love-arn't they Mormans? I thought all Morman had a couple of wives..

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Halfcan

It is a breaking story-I am sure someone will post the video when it becomes available-the guy looks like Bill Gates. His bitches I mean wives, could not do anything without asking him first.

He molested his own kids too.

They had something like this on Dateline a couple of years ago. Some small town out that direction had dudes that had many wives and mollested their kids. Their excuse was that the kids belonged to them, much like animals do. It was difficult to watch. Of course, everything was ok because God said it was cool.

[Halfcan]

Originally Posted by Jilly

no shit....all of a sudden it was all intellectual, interrupting my 80 husban ds fantasy....

- I'd learn to be an expert at Madden
- I'd definitely have enough knowledge for the FF draft
- I'm sure one would be a metrosexual and could go shopping for me to pick out my clothes since I hate it.


Oh the list goes on forever...

You better pass that idea past your current fiance or husband first-he might not like the idea of 79 other guys in the same bed-lol

[bkkcoh]

no more than 80 mother-in-laws, nope way too many.....

[Halfcan]

[QUOTE=Pitt Gorilla]They had something like this on Dateline a couple of years ago. Some small town out that direction had dudes that had many wives and mollested their kids. Their excuse was that the kids belonged to them, much like animals do. It was difficult to watch. Of course, everything was ok because God said it was cool.[/

I think I saw that-did they have the kids grown up and telling their stories?? Pretty sad deal-the kids were passed around like hookers. The abuse went on for their entire childhood.

[Pitt Gorilla]

[QUOTE=Halfcan]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

They had something like this on Dateline a couple of years ago. Some small town out that direction had dudes that had many wives and mollested their kids. Their excuse was that the kids belonged to them, much like animals do. It was difficult to watch. Of course, everything was ok because God said it was cool.[/

I think I saw that-did they have the kids grown up and telling their stories?? Pretty sad deal-the kids were passed around like hookers. The abuse went on for their entire childhood.

Yeah, one of his daughters was with the Dateline people. I guess she was able to escape. Anyway, she went back and confronted her dad. The whole thing made me ill.

[vailpass]

Originally Posted by UTChief

He is not a Morman he is from Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of laterday saints There is a difference, he use to be a morman untill he was excamunicated. morman religion dont practice poligamy.

There is an investigative reporter here in Phoenix who has been writing on the misdeeds of Wareen Jeffs & the evil deeds of his organization for years. What is your response to this article he wrote earlier this year? I'll quote part of it here then paste a link in case you wish to read the entire piece.

From phoenixnewtimes.com
Originally published by Phoenix New Times 2006-05-25
©2005 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved.

It Practices What They Preach

Cast into the spotlight by fugitive polygamist Prophet Warren Jeffs, the mainstream Mormon Church's trying to distance itself from its infamous cousin
By John Dougherty


And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified.
-- Joseph Smith's 1831 revelation on marriage and polygamy as currently published in the mainstream Mormon Church's Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132, Verse 62

The 12 million-strong Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is desperately seeking to disassociate itself from its uncomfortable polygamist underpinnings.

The mainstream Mormon church has been thrust into the spotlight worldwide because of the unlawful flight from justice of polygamist leader Warren Steed Jeffs, and church leaders in Salt Lake City are emphasizing loud and long that they have no connection to the fugitive.

Earlier this month, Jeffs, 50, was placed on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list for fleeing from Arizona and Utah prosecutors who have filed criminal charges related to his performing so-called spiritual marriages of underage girls to already-married men in his fanatical sect -- the 10,000-member Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints based in Colorado City, Arizona, and adjoining Hildale, Utah.

The FBI's action has generated international interest in the practice of polygamy by the fundamentalist Mormons scattered across the Rocky Mountain West, from Canada to Mexico. In one cable news report, CNN superimposed Jeffs' face in front of the LDS temple in Salt Lake City, giving viewers the impression that Jeffs is a member of the mainstream Church.

"This is not just careless editing, but highly offensive to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," states a May 10 LDS press release posted on the church's Web site. "Warren Jeffs is not and never has been a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints."

The LDS release claimed that the church has no connection to polygamy.

The statement quoted LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley as saying in 1998: "I wish to state categorically that this Church has nothing whatever to do with those practicing polygamy. They are not members of this Church. Most of them have never been members. They are in violation of the civil law. If any of our members are found to be practicing plural marriage, they are excommunicated, the most serious penalty the Church can impose."

These statements give the clear impression that the LDS does not support any form of polygamy, and that polygamy is not part of current church doctrine.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The reality is, many mainstream Mormons believe, the LDS would reinstitute polygamy -- which was practiced by members of the official church from the 1830s into the early 20th century -- if it had the legal power.

Jeffs and his band of hard-core polygamists are providing the public with chilling insight into the abuses of the practice, the most alarming of which is the sexual predation of underage girls. That both branches of the Mormon religion share the same polygamist roots is something the LDS leaders would rather not see exposed.

Both the LDS and the FLDS are based on the spiritual "revelations" of Mormon Church founder and prolific polygamist Joseph Smith. Smith's bedrock religious principle is polygamy, which is described in detail in Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants.

One verse of Section 132 is printed above. Others are directed at Smith's first wife, Emma. She is warned that if she doesn't accept Smith's plural wives, "she shall be destroyed." The admonition to Emma is considered by anti-polygamy activists as a warning to all Mormon women that, if necessary, they must accept polygamy or face hellfire.

The fact that Section 132 remains official Mormon doctrine has been a rallying point for anti-polygamy groups whose leaders bitterly complain that the LDS has provided no support, financial or otherwise, in their efforts to assist women and children who have been victimized by fundamentalist Mormons.

"[LDS] Mormons are trying to present a picture of the traditional family and yet they still have Section 132 in their scripture," notes Vicki Prunty, executive director of the Salt Lake City-based Tapestry Against Polygamy. "They have not denied the belief system that propagates polygamy. Until they do so and treat women as equals, we are going to continue to have the same fallout and abuses."

The LDS has provided little, if any, financial assistance to youth discarded by the polygamists, known as the "Lost Boys," or to desperate mothers who frequently face difficult and expensive legal battles to secure custody of their children.

Instead of providing help to people who, like its members, were brought up on the teachings of Mormon founder Joseph Smith, the LDS do not officially admit that fundamentalist Mormon polygamists even exist....
(cont'd.)

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issue...rty_print.html

[UTChief]

Originally Posted by Halfcan

On the show Big Love-arn't they Mormans? I thought all Morman had a couple of wives..

I know what you are refering to they call them selfs fundamentalist mormans I think. but the morman religion use to have poligamy back in the Brigham young and Joseph Smith days because of all the prosicution alot of the men were killed so the familys were brough into other familys and merryed them. When it started to get out of hand the churck Quit this practice and made it wrong, this guys ansesters didn't like this and split off moving to arizina and started their own church.

[UTChief]

Originally Posted by vailpass

There is an investigative reporter here in Phoenix who has been writing on the misdeeds of Wareen Jeffs & the evil deeds of his organization for years. What is your response to this article he wrote earlier this year? I'll quote part of it here then paste a link in case you wish to read the entire piece.

From phoenixnewtimes.com
Originally published by Phoenix New Times 2006-05-25
©2005 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved.

It Practices What They Preach

Cast into the spotlight by fugitive polygamist Prophet Warren Jeffs, the mainstream Mormon Church's trying to distance itself from its infamous cousin
By John Dougherty


And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified.
-- Joseph Smith's 1831 revelation on marriage and polygamy as currently published in the mainstream Mormon Church's Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132, Verse 62

The 12 million-strong Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is desperately seeking to disassociate itself from its uncomfortable polygamist underpinnings.

The mainstream Mormon church has been thrust into the spotlight worldwide because of the unlawful flight from justice of polygamist leader Warren Steed Jeffs, and church leaders in Salt Lake City are emphasizing loud and long that they have no connection to the fugitive.

Earlier this month, Jeffs, 50, was placed on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list for fleeing from Arizona and Utah prosecutors who have filed criminal charges related to his performing so-called spiritual marriages of underage girls to already-married men in his fanatical sect -- the 10,000-member Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints based in Colorado City, Arizona, and adjoining Hildale, Utah.

The FBI's action has generated international interest in the practice of polygamy by the fundamentalist Mormons scattered across the Rocky Mountain West, from Canada to Mexico. In one cable news report, CNN superimposed Jeffs' face in front of the LDS temple in Salt Lake City, giving viewers the impression that Jeffs is a member of the mainstream Church.

"This is not just careless editing, but highly offensive to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," states a May 10 LDS press release posted on the church's Web site. "Warren Jeffs is not and never has been a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints."

The LDS release claimed that the church has no connection to polygamy.

The statement quoted LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley as saying in 1998: "I wish to state categorically that this Church has nothing whatever to do with those practicing polygamy. They are not members of this Church. Most of them have never been members. They are in violation of the civil law. If any of our members are found to be practicing plural marriage, they are excommunicated, the most serious penalty the Church can impose."

These statements give the clear impression that the LDS does not support any form of polygamy, and that polygamy is not part of current church doctrine.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The reality is, many mainstream Mormons believe, the LDS would reinstitute polygamy -- which was practiced by members of the official church from the 1830s into the early 20th century -- if it had the legal power.

Jeffs and his band of hard-core polygamists are providing the public with chilling insight into the abuses of the practice, the most alarming of which is the sexual predation of underage girls. That both branches of the Mormon religion share the same polygamist roots is something the LDS leaders would rather not see exposed.

Both the LDS and the FLDS are based on the spiritual "revelations" of Mormon Church founder and prolific polygamist Joseph Smith. Smith's bedrock religious principle is polygamy, which is described in detail in Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants.

One verse of Section 132 is printed above. Others are directed at Smith's first wife, Emma. She is warned that if she doesn't accept Smith's plural wives, "she shall be destroyed." The admonition to Emma is considered by anti-polygamy activists as a warning to all Mormon women that, if necessary, they must accept polygamy or face hellfire.

The fact that Section 132 remains official Mormon doctrine has been a rallying point for anti-polygamy groups whose leaders bitterly complain that the LDS has provided no support, financial or otherwise, in their efforts to assist women and children who have been victimized by fundamentalist Mormons.

"[LDS] Mormons are trying to present a picture of the traditional family and yet they still have Section 132 in their scripture," notes Vicki Prunty, executive director of the Salt Lake City-based Tapestry Against Polygamy. "They have not denied the belief system that propagates polygamy. Until they do so and treat women as equals, we are going to continue to have the same fallout and abuses."

The LDS has provided little, if any, financial assistance to youth discarded by the polygamists, known as the "Lost Boys," or to desperate mothers who frequently face difficult and expensive legal battles to secure custody of their children.

Instead of providing help to people who, like its members, were brought up on the teachings of Mormon founder Joseph Smith, the LDS do not officially admit that fundamentalist Mormon polygamists even exist....
(cont'd.)

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issue...rty_print.html

Mainstreem Mormans are not trying to reinstate this practice this is false the ony thing in this article that is true is the Quote from Presedent Hinckley that they are not asociated with this group.

[patteeu]

I'm not sure I think these people should be considered criminals.* I definitely don't think they should be considered equivalent to run-of-the-mill child molesters.

*I do agree that they broke the law, so in that sense they are, in fact, criminals (if convicted).

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by patteeu

I'm not sure I think these people should be considered criminals. I definitely don't think they should be considered equivalent to run-of-the-mill child molesters.

You've got to be kidding; molestting your own child should be punished by AT LEAST castration.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

You've got to be kidding; molestting your own child should be punished by AT LEAST castration.

Link?

[UTChief]

Originally Posted by patteeu

I'm not sure I think these people should be considered criminals. I definitely don't think they should be considered equivalent to run-of-the-mill child molesters.

It depends if he is making his girls marry other men against their will at a young age basikly treating them like slaves this is wrong and the child molesting if true is right there at the top, the ony thing worse would be murder.