Chiefs Would You Trade Our 3rd Rnd Pick For Boldin? - Page 3

-King- · 01-22-2010, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

This.

You just agreed with your own post.
Posted via Mobile Device

**The Franchise** · 01-22-2010, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

You just agreed with your own post.
Posted via Mobile Device

I only did that because I posted that response in the REPOST thread. So I quoted it and posted it over here.

tmax63 · 01-22-2010, 10:19 AM

I think I'll defer to Haley on this one. He should know the guy about as well as anyone and if he brings him here I'll be happy or if he stays away I'll think he has a reason. Not blind faith in Haley, just saying he should know this situation and player better than anyone here in this one instance.

**DeezNutz** · 01-22-2010, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmax63

I think I'll defer to Haley on this one. He should know the guy about as well as anyone and if he brings him here I'll be happy or if he stays away I'll think he has a reason. Not blind faith in Haley, just saying he should know this situation and player better than anyone here in this one instance.

Just like we should defer to Pioli about Cassel? After all, our GM knows him best, so if he wants to pull the trigger, we know the dude is legit.

Um, yeah, **** that.

Until they prove otherwise, all our head guys have demonstrated is that they're dumb as ****.

ToxSocks · 01-22-2010, 10:19 AM

I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Maybe Chambers.

Now we are talking explosive at the skill position. Boldin would fill a huge need till Haley can draft and develop some decent WR's.

And who gives a shit how much he wants to get paid. Uncapped year coming up.

BigCatDaddy · 01-22-2010, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Yeah, or another Jamal Charles!!!!! Oh wait......

CoMoChief · 01-22-2010, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee.

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Maybe Chambers.

Now we are talking explosive at the skill position. Boldin would fill a huge need till Haley can draft and develop some decent WR's.

And who gives a shit how much he wants to get paid. Uncapped year coming up.

Mr. Laz · 01-22-2010, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

what's so funny?

CoMoChief · 01-22-2010, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

what's so funny?

The fact that he listed Alex Magee as a WR option, since the current options we have at that position blow ass and can't catch.

Mr. Laz · 01-22-2010, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

The fact that he listed Alex Magee as a WR option, since the current options we have at that position blow ass and can't catch.

he wasn't listing Alex Magee as a wide receiver, he used Magee's name because he was our 3rd round pick last year.

"would you trade a 3rd round pick for Boldin?"

he was saying that WR Boldin > DE Magee type player in the 3rd round.

Mr. Laz · 01-22-2010, 10:22 AM

actually the real question should be "Would you give a huge contract to a 29 year old receiver who has been injured the last 2 seasons?"

RedThat · 01-22-2010, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

actually the real question should be "Would you give a huge contract to a 29 year old receiver who has been injured the last 2 seasons?"

I would for a couple of reasons. 1. the guy is consistent, and 2. he produces

can't go wrong with that?

the injuries are a concern, yes, but the fact of the matter is, Boldin is a gamer. If we go by stats, and history, it shows that he is good to play for at least 3 quarters of a season. Not bad. Only once in his career has he played for half a season. Plus, WR is a position that guys can play well into their 30's anyway.

*I'd be for the move, but I also think the Chiefs should re-sign Chambers. Having a WR corps of Bowe, Boldin, and Chambers is really stout.

*Even if Boldin got hurt, we couldn't take away what he would bring in productivity. I still think Chambers could fill in as a starter for those 4 games, and having him to go alongside with Bowe and Charles, I could live with that.

Brock · 01-22-2010, 10:23 AM

Nope, I sure wouldn't.

**bevischief** · 01-22-2010, 10:43 AM

No not at this time, we have too many needs to spend on a player that wants to get paid and has a history of injuries, maybe this would make sense after the draft and free agency.

ToxSocks · 01-22-2010, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief

No not at this time, we have too many needs to spend on a player that wants to get paid and has a history of injuries, maybe this would make sense after the draft and free agency.

That really doesn't make much sense. If we're ever going to get back to winning, we need to find winning players. We all know that a franchise can turn around within one season if you add the right players. Boldin could be one of those players. By adding Bolden, you could say that we've fixed our WR issues that have been plaguing this team for the last decade AT LEAST. If a Pro-Bowl WR that is NOT on the downside of his career isn't worth a 3rd rnd pick, then we are being too damn picky.

I'd rather have a proven Pro-Bowl WR that we KNOW will have a substantial impact on the offense rather then trying to draft a Rookie WR in the 3rd round of a weak Wr class. And if the presence of Boldin equates to maybe 7 more points per game, then how many more games would we win?

Good football teams fill there roster with good football players whenever the opportunity arises.

How good do we look at the skill positions if we had:

Charles
Boldin
Bowe
Chambers (maybe) On Offense

And

Flowers
Carr
Berry
Page
Johnson
Spikes
Dorsey

On D.

That's impact right there. Especially with a Weiss and Crennel coaching.

01-22-2010, 10:19 AM	#3
tmax63 Veteran Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Colorado Casino cash: $543600	I think I'll defer to Haley on this one. He should know the guy about as well as anyone and if he brings him here I'll be happy or if he stays away I'll think he has a reason. Not blind faith in Haley, just saying he should know this situation and player better than anyone here in this one instance. __________________ An armed member of society is a citizen, an unarmed member is a subject.
Posts: 3,989

01-22-2010, 10:19 AM	#5
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $2133063	I'd say **** yes. I'd rather have a 29 year old Boldin that gives us a legitamet (sp) WR on the outside then another Alex Magee. Charles Boldin Bowe Maybe Chambers. Now we are talking explosive at the skill position. Boldin would fill a huge need till Haley can draft and develop some decent WR's. And who gives a shit how much he wants to get paid. Uncapped year coming up. __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 65,925

01-22-2010, 10:22 AM	#11
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	actually the real question should be "Would you give a huge contract to a 29 year old receiver who has been injured the last 2 seasons?" __________________
Posts: 95,626

01-22-2010, 10:23 AM	#13
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	Nope, I sure wouldn't.
Posts: 47,314

01-22-2010, 10:43 AM	#14
bevischief .... Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Somewhere Kansas Casino cash: $7759352 VARSITY	No not at this time, we have too many needs to spend on a player that wants to get paid and has a history of injuries, maybe this would make sense after the draft and free agency.
Posts: 27,771