Chiefs vs. Bucs

[Ralphy Boy]

Originally Posted by BossChief

see, this is where stats can blatantly lie to people that just look at them as sole proof.

The guy only completed 16 passes over 20 yards... all year.

Of those 16 passes, I bet at least 6 of them were catches by Chris Chambers had to stop his route and come back to the football because the pass was soo off.

I think he will develop into a good short route thrower and decision maker, but the thing that will keep us from beating good teams is the lack of stretching the field. Its too bad, this running game could explode on a grand scale if we could consistently keep the opposing safeties out of the box.

I'm not concerned that he only completed 16 passes over 20 yards, that's 8 more than he completed the year before and the exact same number that Brady completed in 2009. Hell Matt Ryan only completed 9 and Mark Sanchez 10 last season.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy

I'm not concerned that he only completed 16 passes over 20 yards, that's 8 more than he completed the year before and the exact same number that Brady completed in 2009. Hell Matt Ryan only completed 9 and Mark Sanchez 10 last season.

I don't care how many passes he completed over 20 yards, either.

I do care how many of those completions were accurately thrown balls.

Most of those were poorly thrown balls that the receivers had to make major adjustments to.

I think there were two of them that would have been sure touchdowns had they been even close to accurate, on drives that ended up in FGs.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by milkman

I ****ing forgot to set the game to record.

However, if Albert looked the same in this game as he did in Atlanta, then I have no problem with Okung's sac "bashing" Albert.

In that Atlanta game, he looked like he didn't do any work in the offseason on his own to improve his technique, and that is inexcusable, IMO.

Albert should've been better in this game, but he was hardly the liability that Sac painted him to be. Not even close.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Albert should've been better in this game, but he was hardly the liability that Sac painted him to be. Not even close.

I watched the first half again last night and do not see where Albert played poorly. Not sure if people are wanting pancake blocks every down or what.

[ToxSocks]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

I watched the first half again last night and do not see where Albert played poorly. Not sure of people are wanting pancake blocks every down or what.

It's because people aren't understanding the concept of a "pocket". Some, when examining the line, just want to see the DE stopped dead in his tracks once the ball is snapped. IT doesn't always work like that.

Hell, the play may not even be designed to do that.

Albert didn't have a GREAT game, but he didn't have a bad game either.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Is Flowers still gonna' be on the team, Sac?