Chiefs | Team will likely look for top defensive tackle

[recxjake]

Chiefs | Team will likely look for top defensive tackle
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:22:46 -0800

Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs are expected to target a high-quality defensive tackle this offseason, and unless one is released, they will likely have to look to the draft for one.


Chiefs | Webb will see increased role next season
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:43:37 -0800

Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports Kansas City Chiefs WR Jeff Webb will be a bigger part of the team's offense next season, according to head coach Herman Edwards. "Webb will be a part of this offense," said Edwards. "He needs to be. He's a good football player. We've got to get him on the football field."

[jspchief]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88

Herm Schottenheimer is seriously trying to assemble the worst offense in modern NFL history.

Brodie Croyle? Jeff Webb? Jordan Black? The fact Herm actually thinks these players have a future in the Chiefs offense shows how clueless he is.

Webb and Croyle have barely even seen the Pro field. How in the hell have you already determined they are busts?

[Chris Meck]

For cryin' out loud.

you don't go to a 3-4 because you have no DT's.

We don't have ANY 3-4 ends (Tamba and Allen are way too small to play end in a 3-4, and yet too big and too standard of 4-3 type athletes to play OLB in a 3-4.)

We don't have any real ILB's for a 3-4 other than Bell.


It's a really dumb idea. We'd negate an awful lot of good young talent at key spots (DE, LB) just because...

what? WE'd still need a massive DT. So there's really no reason at all.

Chris

[suds79]

Originally Posted by jspchief

Webb and Croyle have barely even seen the Pro field. How in the hell have you already determined they are busts?

Good point.

Now Jordan Black is a different story.

But as far as Webb & Croyle, you never know until you play them. I'm ready for change.

[HMc]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

For cryin' out loud.

you don't go to a 3-4 because you have no DT's.

We don't have ANY 3-4 ends (Tamba and Allen are way too small to play end in a 3-4, and yet too big and too standard of 4-3 type athletes to play OLB in a 3-4.)

We don't have any real ILB's for a 3-4 other than Bell.


It's a really dumb idea. We'd negate an awful lot of good young talent at key spots (DE, LB) just because...

what? WE'd still need a massive DT. So there's really no reason at all.

Chris

I was kidding.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

Boy I'm glad they scouped that info out of the Chiefs.

Originally Posted by bushmaster

teicher is a bloodhound.

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

We need a DT????

Originally Posted by shaneo69

Hey Teicher, FYI, there's this thing the NFL has, I think it's called free agency, that allows you to sign players such as, oh, maybe DT's, after their contracts expire. The invention of free agency allows teams to now fill their holes without having to wait for a great player to get released, or without having to spend a draft pick on the position of need.

Originally Posted by rxrider

I hear Ryan Simms is available on the Cheap!

....oh wait.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Man, you can't get scoops like this with a premium membership, that's for sure!

Love. It.

[Chief Roundup]

Hmm I thought Carl Peterson just said that LT was the most pressing need or something to that affect on the radio.

[HMc]

as if all pro DTs aren't being released all over the place.

[Mojo Rising]

Originally Posted by HMc

as if all pro DTs aren't being released all over the place.

Booger McFarland is not an All Pro, however, he is better than anything that will wear a Chiefs uni next year. He was available last year.

Donte Stallworth was also available last year before the season when he could have made a difference.

These were both glaring needs. Instead, we focused on Michael Bennett, who did fill a void. We should have also gone for these other solutions.

[HMc]

Drew Bennett