Who should we draft 1st?

[KCChiefsMan]

who should it be?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Mecca

"Could" it's 99% likely that Clausen is going to be available with that pick...

The wildcard would be if STL can't get anywhere with Bradford and Clausen is an easier sign.

[Mecca]

The McNabb trade killed Bradford's contract leverage, he can't play hardball now the Rams are his best destination.

[KCChiefsMan]

Weiss would have to give Pioli one hell of an argument for Clausen if we are going to draft him. Even though we just signed Cassel to a huge contract and gave up a 2nd rounder for him, even with that, I think it's slightly possible that we could draft him. I don't know why, but with Charlie Weiss here, maybe. I hope not though. If it were me, it's Eric Berry or trade out of #5

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

So you're both operating under the presumption that Pioli is a moron?

Because if he genuinely believes that Matt Cassel is a franchise quarterback of any sort, that's precisely what Pioli is.

The question was not "who will the Chiefs draft" but rather "who should they draft".

You're only going to make things worse for yourself. Please, just walk away.

People thought Vermeil was a moron after year one with Green.

Yes, I believe that Pioli still believes Cassel is his franchise QB.

Who should KC draft - Berry.

[Mecca]

Please don't use the Green argument, Cassel looked far more inept than Green ever did.

[Sully]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Well man I'm sorry but it's the sad reality of the situation.

This forum is the only place where Clausen is even considered an option.

It's not the reality of the situation. It's your opinion of the situation. In three weeks we'll know the reality of the situation. But no matter how many times or on how many threads you post your opinion, it doesn't change that it's still an opinion.

You know I've never ripped you. I somewhat respect your knowledge. Bit if all you're going to do the next three weeks is post like an eight year old who just learned a new joke and needs to repeat it as many times as possible, it's going to get real ****ing old. Hell, I'd think it'd be boring for you to do that.

[KCChiefsMan]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Please don't use the Green argument, Cassel looked far more inept than Green ever did.

hmmmm, not sure. The Green argument is the only hope we have left. Don't try to take that away from us.

[Mecca]

At this point I think getting worked up that the Chiefs might take a QB isn't worth it.

If they were gonna take one last year was the time to do that and they shit themselves and traded for Matt Cassel.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Please don't use the Green argument, Cassel looked far more inept than Green ever did.

You must have missed Green's first season in KC. About the same completion percentage and 7 more picks. Plus he had the benefit of having some receivers who actually held onto the ball (on the odd chance they were running correct routes).

[CoMoChief]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsMan

who should it be?

REPOST x100,000,000,000,000

JFC, man....

[KCChiefsMan]

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

REPOST x100,000,000,000,000

JFC, man....

really? we are having a pretty solid discussion here, JFC man? isn't that the whole point of this board?

[Iowanian]

Originally Posted by Mecca

This is one if the funniest things I've seen posted, is this serious or tongue in cheek?

Also wanting a player to piss me off sure is a nice thing, pray the team sucks because it'll make me mad, good logic.

I've already accepted that the team is going to suck, I'm using about 30 years of data to support my belief.

I was half needling regarding Berry, but there are analysts who believe some teams don't have him rated the highest.

I just think its' funny because of your comments about players from Iowa....I've watched them and think Bulaga is a very good LT prospect, and O-line is definitely a position of need for the Chiefs.

Personally, I'm going to stop trying to guess what they'll do and hope I'm happy with the results on the field because frankly, draft day doesn't do that. There are quite a few options that will make me happy, including Berry or trading down. Whatever makes the team improve the most.

If they take someone that makes some of you self appointed experts turn inside out.....awesome.

[MoreLemonPledge]

If we had drafted Sanchez last year and he played like he did last year, some of you would be calling for his head. Keep in mind that the Jets managed to make the playoffs in spite of him, certainly not because of him. Imagine how terrible he would have been on this team.

Very few QBs would have excelled in the situation the Chiefs had last year. If Cassel still plays as poorly this season, I will eat all the crow in the world. But Pioli will give him another chance.

Again, I don't see the point in swallowing Clausen's load every other post. It's just not going to happen.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge

If we had drafted Sanchez last year and he played like he did last year, some of you would be calling for his head. Keep in mind that the Jets managed to make the playoffs in spite of him, certainly not because of him. Imagine how terrible he would have been on this team.

Very few QBs would have excelled in the situation the Chiefs had last year. If Cassel still plays as poorly this season, I will eat all the crow in the world. But Pioli will give him another chance.

Again, I don't see the point in swallowing Clausen's load every other post. It's just not going to happen.

Once again....not true.

I, like I'm sure many others around here, would be perfectly fine giving a rookie QB time. I am not, however, fine with giving a 28 year old QB time because he should ****ing have it at this point in time.

[notorious]

The 10% of Okung supporters need to be raped by a pineapple injected with AIDs and antifreeze.



J/K. Okung supporters, state why he should be the pick over the most important position on the field and the best safety prospect to come along in a while.