Poop The Official Chiefs Planet Word Association Game - Page 469

**BigRedChief** · 08:51 PM

Here's how you play. You associate a word with the previous posters word. I've seen these threads on BB's go on for years......An example

Chiefs
the next poster posts
Arrowhead
The next
tailgating
the next
BBQ
and so on and so on
no thread drift. Post only one word without comment. Try not to repeat words.

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico Diablo

empty

discharge

Slayer Diablo · 07-05-2005, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommykat

discharge

fire

go bo · 07-05-2005, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

As everybody knows, I have no respect at all for this thread. It has never been a "game" at all. Just a postwhore thread. It has been kept active due to n00bs, dumbasses and a few regulars. I have maintained since day 1 that it is a thread for the braindead. So I am conducting a study designed to evaluate the contribution of each of the participating posters to this board. I am starting with the "regulars" that contribute to this thread. For lack of a better measure, I am using your number of successful threads started as an indication of your perceived worth to this board. If you can't create a successful thread, how can you create a successful reply to this board? I will prove that this ignorant thread is supported by dipshits that are nothing but hangers on to this board. For starters, GoBo has started only two threads. Neither are much. GoBo doesn't contribute much to the board except post whoring. He's a good guy, but doesn't do anything but postwhore. This board would fold up if all we had was guys like GoBo. To be continued.

well, we'd fold up happy if we didn't have to listen to your horseshit all the time...

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico Diablo

fire

water

go bo · 07-05-2005, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico Diablo

fire

smoke

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo

well, we'd fold up happy if we didn't have to listen to your horseshit all the time...

Touche'

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo

smoke

Indian

**Skip Towne** · 07-05-2005, 10:22 PM

Continued...Then I looked at the Bunnyturd. He has 88 threads started but they are almost all duds with very few replies. He has a grand total of ONE thread garnering 100 replies. His replies are lame as is indicated by his shitty threads he has started. In contrast, I have started 250 threads and 44 of them have gone for more than 100 replies. Who else has that many? Or even close? Does that mean my replies are as successful as my 100 reply threads? I say yes. What other measure do we have? How do we measure who is the best contributor to this board? It damn sure isn't that collection of dipshits that post on the "Word Association Game" thread. I'll bet I have more 100+ threads started than everybody on that ignorant thread combined. So who is better, me or that combination of braindead dickheads?

Slayer Diablo · 07-05-2005, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommykat

Indian

chief

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico Diablo

chief

Trent

PastorMikH · 07-05-2005, 10:27 PM

Skip, take an estrogen pill and relax. What makes you any more important to the Planet than anyone else? I don't see you listed at the bottom with the Mods. There are times when you have a real narrow view of what people should post about. You want to make an issue of who ADDS to the Planet and who doesn't. Granted I've had some laughs with you and I've had some at you. But take away the advice you give concerning DirectTV, what do you really add to this place with your posts other than irritation? There are a lot of people here to just have fun. I am not sure why that bothers you so, I also don't see why it should. There are a lot of threads here that I don't want to take part in, so instead of griping about them, I just ignore them. Obviously other people are enjoying them, that's why they are on top. So I just pass them on by - and guess what, it doesn't bother me one way or another.

Someone that has close to 30k posts griping about people with a lot less posts is hypocritical. And starting a thread identical to one you blasted people for and even gave neg rep to other people for posting on is extremely hypocritical.

Slayer Diablo · 07-05-2005, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommykat

Trent

Green

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

Continued...Then I looked at the Bunnyturd. He has 88 threads started but they are almost all duds with very few replies. He has a grand total of ONE thread garnering 100 replies. His replies are lame as is indicated by his shitty threads he has started. In contrast, I have started 250 threads and 44 of them have gone for more than 100 replies. Who else has that many? Or even close? Does that mean my replies are as successful as my 100 reply threads? I say yes. What other measure do we have? How do we measure who is the best contributor to this board? It damn sure isn't that collection of dipshits that post on the "Word Association Game" thread. I'll bet I have more 100+ threads started than everybody on that ignorant thread combined. So who is better, me or that combination of braindead dickheads?

At least you continue to make this thread ccount continue up

tommykat · 07-05-2005, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico Diablo

Green

turf

Slayer Diablo · 07-05-2005, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommykat

turf

gang

10-12-2004, 02:01 PM
BigRedChief Has a particular set of skills Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: On the water Casino cash: $-581038 VARSITY	The Chiefs Planet Word Association Game Here's how you play. You associate a word with the previous posters word. I've seen these threads on BB's go on for years......An example Chiefs the next poster posts Arrowhead The next tailgating the next BBQ and so on and so on no thread drift. Post only one word without comment. Try not to repeat words. Last edited by BigRedChief; 10-27-2004 at 08:51 PM..
Posts: 81,262

07-05-2005, 10:22 PM	#7028
Skip Towne Supporter Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: T-Town Casino cash: $10004900	Continued...Then I looked at the Bunnyturd. He has 88 threads started but they are almost all duds with very few replies. He has a grand total of ONE thread garnering 100 replies. His replies are lame as is indicated by his shitty threads he has started. In contrast, I have started 250 threads and 44 of them have gone for more than 100 replies. Who else has that many? Or even close? Does that mean my replies are as successful as my 100 reply threads? I say yes. What other measure do we have? How do we measure who is the best contributor to this board? It damn sure isn't that collection of dipshits that post on the "Word Association Game" thread. I'll bet I have more 100+ threads started than everybody on that ignorant thread combined. So who is better, me or that combination of braindead dickheads?
Posts: 69,689

07-05-2005, 10:27 PM	#7031
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9905087	Skip, take an estrogen pill and relax. What makes you any more important to the Planet than anyone else? I don't see you listed at the bottom with the Mods. There are times when you have a real narrow view of what people should post about. You want to make an issue of who ADDS to the Planet and who doesn't. Granted I've had some laughs with you and I've had some at you. But take away the advice you give concerning DirectTV, what do you really add to this place with your posts other than irritation? There are a lot of people here to just have fun. I am not sure why that bothers you so, I also don't see why it should. There are a lot of threads here that I don't want to take part in, so instead of griping about them, I just ignore them. Obviously other people are enjoying them, that's why they are on top. So I just pass them on by - and guess what, it doesn't bother me one way or another. Someone that has close to 30k posts griping about people with a lot less posts is hypocritical. And starting a thread identical to one you blasted people for and even gave neg rep to other people for posting on is extremely hypocritical. __________________
Posts: 20,454