Who's D is better? - Page 5

OctoberFart · 04-04-2007, 03:40 PM

Oakland or KC Chiefs?

DL advantage Oakland Sapp, Burgess, Kelly, Sands are better than DUI BOY, Hali and the rest of scrub DT's.

LB's advantage Oakland. Young LB's in Morrison, Howard, Williams are some of the most underated in the league. KC is pretty good with DJ being the best and NAP hasn't been the same since he left Oak town and Edwards is a stop gap at this point in his career.

Secondary isn't even close as Oaklands young DB's have proved to be bigger playmakers playing in a tough man to man D instead of a crappy talent masking cover 2. Ty Law is one of the most overrated CB's ever and has made his name on 3 good games in his career.

Overall stats

Oakland
3 overall in league

NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G
Oakland 4557 284.8 2144 134.0 2413 150.8 332 20.8

Oaklands Pts allowed is amazing since they fielded the worst offense in the history of NFL last year.

KC
16 overall in league

NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G
Kansas City 5262 328.9 1928 120.5 3334 208.4 315 19.7

Can't wait to see how the homers here spin their arguments that KC's D is better.

whtgldwldr · 04-06-2007, 12:23 AM

first of all...their linebackers are simply not as good as ours. They're not as good as DJ, let alone Edwards and Harris.

Second, their D-Line is WAYWAYWAY better than ours. Congrats.

Third, the secondary. Ummm...it could be argued either way and I wouldn't necessarily disagree...but Law/Surtain/Page, Pollard, or Wesley is a bit better than Asomugha/Washington/Schweigert/Huff in my opinion.

Thirdlyish, its relatively easy to keep your total yardage down when you don't have to defend an entire field. Ever. And typically, the black and silver defended about half a field per drive.

The fact that they still allowed 4557 would be quite depressing if i lived in california and had the misfortune cheering for the worst team in football.

So how's aboot you just run along home, and stop bothering us with your dumbass statistics that have no relevancy about the better team here. As my predecessors said...look at the records, one of us made the playoffs...the other one emerged victorious in the Brady Quinn/Jamarcus Russell sweepstakes. Congratu-****ing-lations.

Suck it,

I'm out

04-04-2007, 03:40 PM
OctoberFart Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10006091	Who's D is better? Oakland or KC Chiefs? DL advantage Oakland Sapp, Burgess, Kelly, Sands are better than DUI BOY, Hali and the rest of scrub DT's. LB's advantage Oakland. Young LB's in Morrison, Howard, Williams are some of the most underated in the league. KC is pretty good with DJ being the best and NAP hasn't been the same since he left Oak town and Edwards is a stop gap at this point in his career. Secondary isn't even close as Oaklands young DB's have proved to be bigger playmakers playing in a tough man to man D instead of a crappy talent masking cover 2. Ty Law is one of the most overrated CB's ever and has made his name on 3 good games in his career. Overall stats Oakland 3 overall in league NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G Oakland 4557 284.8 2144 134.0 2413 150.8 332 20.8 Oaklands Pts allowed is amazing since they fielded the worst offense in the history of NFL last year. KC 16 overall in league NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G Kansas City 5262 328.9 1928 120.5 3334 208.4 315 19.7 Can't wait to see how the homers here spin their arguments that KC's D is better.
Posts: 2,583

04-06-2007, 12:23 AM	#61
whtgldwldr Analyst Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Me live at Missouri Casino cash: $10004925	first of all...their linebackers are simply not as good as ours. They're not as good as DJ, let alone Edwards and Harris. Second, their D-Line is WAYWAYWAY better than ours. Congrats. Third, the secondary. Ummm...it could be argued either way and I wouldn't necessarily disagree...but Law/Surtain/Page, Pollard, or Wesley is a bit better than Asomugha/Washington/Schweigert/Huff in my opinion. Thirdlyish, its relatively easy to keep your total yardage down when you don't have to defend an entire field. Ever. And typically, the black and silver defended about half a field per drive. The fact that they still allowed 4557 would be quite depressing if i lived in california and had the misfortune cheering for the worst team in football. So how's aboot you just run along home, and stop bothering us with your dumbass statistics that have no relevancy about the better team here. As my predecessors said...look at the records, one of us made the playoffs...the other one emerged victorious in the Brady Quinn/Jamarcus Russell sweepstakes. Congratu-****ing-lations. Suck it, I'm out __________________ I am a firm supporter of Kris "Bigfoot" Wilson, we need more from #84.
Posts: 111