What would be your reaction?

[The Franchise]

The Chiefs are on the clock at #21 and Roger Goodell walks up to the podium.

The Kansas City Chiefs select Colin Kaepernick, QB, University of Nevada.

How do you react?



This thread is based off of the rumor that an AFC West team has CK as their #1 QB. Assuming that means its the Raiders, Broncos and Chiefs.

[Chiefnj2]

I'd prefer Mallett in the first, Ponder in the 2nd and Stanzi in the 3rd ALL over CK in the 1st.

[Demonpenz]

I haven't watched enough so I would go with what Pioli does. We won the Afc west last year, that just seems so unlikely that anything he does I will trust for awhile.

[Dante84]

Will someone please take this jackass out back and put him out of our misery?

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

First off.....what I'm getting from all of this is that a majority of the people who voted "**** yeah!" would be happy because it showed that Pioli isn't satisfied with the QB position (starter or depth). It also would show that he had the balls to take a QB in the 1st round.....Cassel or no Cassel.

I don't have a problem with taking a QB in round 1. If you wanted this to be about getting a QB in round 1, you should have said so. YOU DIDN'T SAY A QB, YOU SAID CK. I have a problem with CK in round 1. He's a huge project and is not worth the 21st pick, especially to us because he really doesn't fit what we are trying to do. Haley doesn't want a running QB. If you think CK is worth the pick for the Chiefs, you are an ear biter. Not a good fit.

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Second off.....anyone who starts a thread advocating that we trade Dorsey so that we can draft a #2 WR.....shouldn't be calling people reeruns. Seriously dude.....go **** yourself.

In a scenario that we could trade Dorsey (which we can't) for Julio Jones and a few picks, we could benefit in value. There is a large drop off in talent at the WR spot after Julio. Julio fits the system and provides value in the pick.

5 techs are not normally hard to find and they are not normally difference makers for the defense. There positional value is lower, especially in Haley's offense.

A great WR provides much more value in Haley's system than a 5 tech.

If you can't see that, then you are an IDIOT.

I said at the first of my post that I didn't refer to the trade chart and that it could be more or less in compensation in picks.

[BigCatDaddy]

[QUOTE=kcbubb;7581823] Haley doesn't want a running QB. If you think CK is worth the pick for the Chiefs, you are an ear biter. Not a good fit.



QUOTE]

What do you mean by running QB? Are you talking about guys like Gabbert, Newton, and Locker that all run very well? What NFL offense is built around a QB running the ball?

[The Franchise]

Ear biter? So I'm Mike Tyson?

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

I don't have a problem with taking a QB in round 1. If you wanted this to be about getting a QB in round 1, you should have said so. YOU DIDN'T SAY A QB, YOU SAID CK. I have a problem with CK in round 1. He's a huge project and is not worth the 21st pick, especially to us because he really doesn't fit what we are trying to do. Haley doesn't want a running QB. If you think CK is worth the pick for the Chiefs, you are an ear biter. Not a good fit.



In a scenario that we could trade Dorsey (which we can't) for Julio Jones and a few picks, we could benefit in value. There is a large drop off in talent at the WR spot after Julio. Julio fits the system and provides value in the pick.

5 techs are not normally hard to find and they are not normally difference makers for the defense. There positional value is lower, especially in Haley's offense.

A great WR provides much more value in Haley's system than a 5 tech.

If you can't see that, then you are an IDIOT.

I said at the first of my post that I didn't refer to the trade chart and that it could be more or less in compensation in picks.

Did I say that's what I wanted? I said thats what I'm gathering from the responses. You have a serious reading comprehension problem that you need to correct.

And 5 Techs have a lower position value in Haley's offense huh? Gotcha.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

Long story short, you would be happy with CK at 21.



Maybe not thrilled, but happy. That's fine. That's your opinion. Stand on it. Don't be a p***y and dance around it. You maybe right. He might turn out to be a great player.

No one really knows. This is the draft. It is a crap shoot. Even the best ones really mess it up. Belichek (please don't correct my spelling b/c I don't care) passed on Clay Matthews twice.

I don't agree with you on CK. I think picking him with #21 is a bad value because of the risk. I also don't think he fits our offense very well. The Chiefs are looking for a QB that can win the game from the pocket.

The Chiefs will have drafted a QB in the first round. One who has the potential to be really ****ing good. Yes, I'd be happy. It's a reach and there are better QBs out there, but they got the guy they like and who they think can make it happen.

Last year the Broncos took Tebow in the late first. Same story. Tebow was McDaniels' guy. It just turned out that McDaniels is a shitty ****ing head coach.

You're still a giant moron.

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Ear biter? So I'm Mike Tyson?

Try to bite your ear and you will get the point.

[kcbubb]

[QUOTE=BigCatDaddy;7581852]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

Haley doesn't want a running QB. If you think CK is worth the pick for the Chiefs, you are an ear biter. Not a good fit.



QUOTE]

What do you mean by running QB? Are you talking about guys like Gabbert, Newton, and Locker that all run very well? What NFL offense is built around a QB running the ball?

Shanahan uses a mobile QB. Gailey could install a pistol package for him. Excuse running. I was referring more to a mobile QB vs a pocket QB. Haley prefers a pocket QB.

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by SNR

Yes, I'd be happy.

At least you grew some nuts.

Originally Posted by SNR

Last year the Broncos took Tebow in the late first. Same story.

Same story with Tebow being a great NFL QB. So, are you endorsing the donks pick of Tebow in the first round??? You do don't you. Tell the truth you coward.

[BigCatDaddy]

[QUOTE=kcbubb;7581902]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

Shanahan uses a mobile QB. Gailey could install a pistol package for him. Excuse running. I was referring more to a mobile QB vs a pocket QB. Haley prefers a pocket QB.

Jay Cutler ran a 4.77 40 when he was drafted. While not a statue he isn't as "mobile" as Matt Cassell.

What coach doesn't prefer a QB that can stand there and throw strikes from the pocket?

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

At least you grew some nuts.

So, are you endorsing the donks pick of Tebow in the first round??? You do don't you. Tell the truth you coward.

Who the **** do you think you are? Joe McCarthy?

I think Tebow was a shitty pick. He has a lot more hang-ups than Colin Kaepernick does. The stuff that he needs to work out can't be done by hard work alone. He needs way more time than Kaepernick to get things figured out.

I would have legitimately been upset about the Chiefs picking Tebow in the first round, assuming the traded into the late first with their 2nd round pick last year. I don't think Tebow can succeed. Our coaching staff probably would have, so at least they're thinking about QB and they realize that Cassel isn't the long-term answer.

Also, you're an abortion

[HotRoute]

The real story is what qb pioli takes with the 199th pick we have. We all know his history with that selection (tom brady)

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by HotRoute

The real story is what qb pioli takes with the 199th pick we have. We all know his history with that selection (tom brady)

Fascinating. Tell me more.