NFL Draft Geno Smith fans roll call - Page 533

**RealSNR** · 12:32 PM

NEW THREAD HEADER (11/17/12):

The list is gone. We will all be Geno Smith fans when he gets drafted by the Chiefs. For historical documentation's sake, I'll keep the list in a separate post on this thread: http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=3314

WHY GENO SMITH?
If you're wondering if Geno Smith is right for you, check out this brilliant post by Saccopoo:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=5388

Next, we have a few GIFs you may be interested in from the Oklahoma game. Insane potential. These are the elite throws that very few QBs can make. What more can I say? Geno Smith can be a franchise QB in the NFL, and the Chiefs need to take a shot on him.

GIF #1:

Spoiler!

GIF #2:

Spoiler!

GIF #3 (My favorite):

Spoiler!

HOW DO WE GET HIM HERE?

Glad you asked. I posted this checklist earlier. It probably belongs in the thread header, and will be updated as the Chiefs close out their season and start a new chapter in their franchise story.

Preparing for Geno Smith's Arrival In KC Checklist

1. [X] Lose games and acquire the #1 overall pick
2. [X] Get Pioli and the Patriot Way cronies the **** out
3. [X] Hire new GM/coach

OPTIONAL (but highly recommended):
4. [ ] Re-sign/tag Bowe, who really wants to play in KC with Geno
5. [ ] Re-sign/tag Albert

fairladyZ · 12-31-2012, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Like I said, if:

16/24
197 yards
2 TDs
0 Ints
163.1 rating

isn't effecient, if that's "falling flat on your face" and if you've "given consideration to the weather," and knowing that a pass TD and a run TD that Geno audibled into were called back due to penalities not caused by Geno, I'd really like to know what your expectations of an nice "efficient performance" would have been.

You forget about the 2 safeties, the 2 lost fumbles (even the fumble on 4th &1 from under center, he got back is still a lost fumble in my eyes as the ball went over on downs) and you STILL think he had a good game?

O.city · 12-31-2012, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ

You forget about the 2 safeties, the 2 lost fumbles (even the fumble on 4th &1 from under center, he got back is still a lost fumble in my eyes as the ball went over on downs) and you STILL think he had a good game?

It didn't go ovver on downs, Syracuse called TO.

ToxSocks · 12-31-2012, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ

You forget about the 2 safeties, the 2 lost fumbles (even the fumble on 4th &1 from under center, he got back is still a lost fumble in my eyes as the ball went over on downs) and you STILL think he had a good game?

Don't forget the 0-10 on 3rd down and 0-2 on 4th down.

It's okay though, he did everything he was suppose to do as a QB.

You're just asking for too much.

Saccopoo · 12-31-2012, 01:29 PM

Okay troll, I'll play...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narrow Head

You can't be pleased unless I tell you that Geno Smith is like RG3

Well, he isn't. Not even close.

I know that they are not close. They are two completely different types of quarterbacks. Griffin's game relies on his legs to get him/his downfield receivers open. Smith is a pocket QB with the athleticism/mobility to make a play with his legs only when he has to. In fact, he probably trusts his arm too much at times when he could take off downfield.

Think of Griffin as a smart version of Michael Vick and Geno as an Aaron Rogers if you want the most appropos NFL comparisons.

Quote:

Think the Chiefs are merely a QB and a coach away from excellence? Of course you do because that's just two moves and presto "We're Good"...much like your fantasy that a good QB will turn a perrenial 2-14 bottom feeder into a contender?

The Chiefs will be picking almost as high in the 2014 draft. With Geno Smith I see a team with a 2013 season of suck and a 2014 and 2015seasons of 7-9type ball before the Chiefs realize that they need to upgrade above Smiths averageness.

So, Troll, I'll ask you this like I've asked most of the other trolls:

Who is your pick at #1?

If Geno Smith isn't worth the #1 pick, who is, and if it's not a QB, then how do you address the Kansas City Chiefs QB situation?

fairladyZ · 12-31-2012, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

It didn't go ovver on downs, Syracuse called TO.

it was 4th&1 and he fumbled the snap and fell on it.. ball went back to S.. How do you not figure it wasn't a turnover because S called a timeout? seriously?

ToxSocks · 12-31-2012, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

It didn't go ovver on downs, Syracuse called TO.

I'm curious to hear other's opinions on this.

Do you think Geno had a good game?

Do you think he did enough as a QB to win that game?

I'm not asking you to evaluate Geno as a prospect. I'm asking you to evaluate that game, and tell me how it was "good".

Saccopoo · 12-31-2012, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ

You forget about the 2 safeties, the 2 lost fumbles (even the fumble on 4th &1 from under center, he got back is still a lost fumble in my eyes as the ball went over on downs) and you STILL think he had a good game?

It's already been addressed, stupid troll mult.

O.city · 12-31-2012, 01:31 PM

Good lord guys.

He made some good plays against Syracuse and he made some bad plays. Threw some good balls, stayed in the pocket a little too long at times and made the wrong pre snap reads.

It's wasn't an awful game, it wasn't a good game. It was an average game, which is fine.

ToxSocks · 12-31-2012, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

It's already been addressed, stupid troll mult.

Yes, we know. It's everything elses fault, just not Geno's.

O.city · 12-31-2012, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fairladyZ

it was 4th&1 and he fumbled the snap and fell on it.. ball went back to S.. How do you not figure it wasn't a turnover because S called a timeout? seriously?

Prior to the snap, Syracuse called TO. Therefor the play didn't count.

Atlest IIRC the right play, where he actually got the first down but a TO was called.

ToxSocks · 12-31-2012, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Good lord guys.

He made some good plays against Syracuse and he made some bad plays. Threw some good balls, stayed in the pocket a little too long at times and made the wrong pre snap reads.

It's wasn't an awful game, it wasn't a good game. It was an average game, which is fine.

Fair enough.

It's pretty much what i stated to Notorius this morning.

Not sure why that's so difficult for saccoshit to figure out.

Instead he wants to tell notorius that he had a "good game"

Saccopoo · 12-31-2012, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

you want me to argue with you, when you can't even get past his stat sheet.

You think Geno played "good enough".

Sorry, but like arguing with a drunk, it's not worth my time.

But, like most offseasons, you can sit there alone with your opinions.

C'mon man, don't be a pussy.

You've called Geno's performance "falling flat on his face" and expected an "efficient" game from him, all things considered.

I'd like to know what you would have thought would have been "efficient" with "all things considered."

Let's hear it, versus you trying to weasel out of it.

ToxSocks · 12-31-2012, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

You wanna REALLY know how he did?

He struggled at times and looked good at times. There were moments where you could see his eyes and head run through his progressions like an all pro. Those would be accompanied by moments in which he locked onto one receiver. There were times when he got rid of the ball quickly, and there were times when he held the ball too long. He had a ball or two that were perfectly placed get dropped, and he had a few balls where he completely misfired.

He struggled to find any consistency at all. Im sure the weather and coaching played a part in it, but they alone are not the reason he struggled so much.

He took TWO sacks for safties. It's not just the fact that he took two sacks like that, it's the fact that he took them JUST as the WV was gaining momentum. One came after the defense forced a turnover. He also fumbled a center/QB exchange. His Lone big play came on pass where the defender slipped and fell. To his credit, he also had a short slant that went the distance, but was called back due to a penalty.

Despite all that, he still showed off his impressive accuracy, quick release and above avg athleticism.

THAT is the truth.

This is it.

fairladyZ · 12-31-2012, 01:33 PM

If he wouldn't have hurt his team by getting 2 safeties and 2 fumbles then it WOULD have been an average game and what you SHOULD expect from the #1 rated QB in bad conditions. But the fact is he did more to hurt his team then help with his play. He made some bad throws, he made a handful of good throws. But it doesn't take back the points he cost his team with turnovers.

Geno has all the tools but what i wanted to see is if he had it mentally and he just doesn't, He has 0 situational awarness, and he cracks when things dont go his way.

O.city · 12-31-2012, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Fair enough.

It's pretty much what i stated to Notorius this morning.

Not sure why that's so difficult for saccoshit to figure out.

Instead he wants to tell notorius that he had a "good game"

He was efficient and I don't think the playcalling helped him out much, but he made a few plays where he tried to do too much.

09-18-2012, 09:07 AM
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $-1464792	Geno Smith fans roll call NEW THREAD HEADER (11/17/12): The list is gone. We will all be Geno Smith fans when he gets drafted by the Chiefs. For historical documentation's sake, I'll keep the list in a separate post on this thread: http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=3314 WHY GENO SMITH? If you're wondering if Geno Smith is right for you, check out this brilliant post by Saccopoo: http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=5388 Next, we have a few GIFs you may be interested in from the Oklahoma game. Insane potential. These are the elite throws that very few QBs can make. What more can I say? Geno Smith can be a franchise QB in the NFL, and the Chiefs need to take a shot on him. GIF #1: Spoiler! GIF #2: Spoiler! GIF #3 (My favorite): Spoiler! HOW DO WE GET HIM HERE? Glad you asked. I posted this checklist earlier. It probably belongs in the thread header, and will be updated as the Chiefs close out their season and start a new chapter in their franchise story. Preparing for Geno Smith's Arrival In KC Checklist 1. [X] Lose games and acquire the #1 overall pick 2. [X] Get Pioli and the Patriot Way cronies the **** out 3. [X] Hire new GM/coach OPTIONAL (but highly recommended): 4. [ ] Re-sign/tag Bowe, who really wants to play in KC with Geno 5. [ ] Re-sign/tag Albert Last edited by RealSNR; 01-04-2013 at 12:32 PM..
Posts: 93,388

12-31-2012, 01:31 PM	#7988
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-665936	Good lord guys. He made some good plays against Syracuse and he made some bad plays. Threw some good balls, stayed in the pocket a little too long at times and made the wrong pre snap reads. It's wasn't an awful game, it wasn't a good game. It was an average game, which is fine.
Posts: 84,208

12-31-2012, 01:33 PM	#7994
fairladyZ Starter Join Date: Dec 2012 Casino cash: $6695234	If he wouldn't have hurt his team by getting 2 safeties and 2 fumbles then it WOULD have been an average game and what you SHOULD expect from the #1 rated QB in bad conditions. But the fact is he did more to hurt his team then help with his play. He made some bad throws, he made a handful of good throws. But it doesn't take back the points he cost his team with turnovers. Geno has all the tools but what i wanted to see is if he had it mentally and he just doesn't, He has 0 situational awarness, and he cracks when things dont go his way.
Posts: 442