ChiefsPlanet LNBS - The People's Mod... term limits? - Page 6

**pr_capone** · 10-28-2015, 04:21 AM

First and foremost... I want to express to Flop that this thread is not in any way shape or form meant to show disrespect or a lack of gratitude for the work done.

Second... this thread is not created to express interest in being a moderator here.

-----

Listening to a conversation tonight were people were talking politics (upcoming election and complaining about entrenched representatives) and it got me thinking to when Flop was voted in as the mod in 2011 and was dubbed "The People's Mod". I was wondering what you all thought about having a single mod position being an elected position for a term of 4 years.

In my head:

* Every 4 years a thread is created by an Admin asking for nominations for "The Peoples Mod".

* People would nominate... then vote

* The incumbent mod could very well be re-elected or a new one would take their place.

What say you?

/this thread is brought to you by insomnia

Hydrae · 10-28-2015, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native

MODS, MAKE ME A MOD FOR MAXIMUM CP BURST! IT WOULD BE AWESOME!

Hey Mods, I think he is asking for a name change to something like KC Burster.

**SAUTO** · 10-28-2015, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Nothing has changed with the team. Exactly. The same arguments have been had here for 15 years. I can remember back on the old star board that people used to point out grbac isn't very good and why do we keep trading for backup qbs, and people would rage on about how drafting a qb is too risky.

Nothing has changed. The same things keep happening over and over again. If you want to remember it differently, it's fine. That's how I remember it.

even most people who didnt think it was the qb are now saying it is the qb

**Bearcat** · 10-28-2015, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

Would never work without transparency from the mod team. Unless the discussions where opinions and actions were publicly known, how would anyone know who the "bad" mods are?

In what ways should we be more transparent?

KC native · 10-28-2015, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

In what ways should we be more transparent?

By making me a mod.

Sunshine is the best disinfectant and I'm a huge ball of sunshine.

**TimBone** · 10-28-2015, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

In what ways should we be more transparent?

We're all gonna need access to the mod lounge.

**TimeForWasp** · 10-28-2015, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze

And I promise to tackle the Chiefs Planet deficit of -$3100

That deficit will be almost doubled by the year 11/01/2015

GIRAFFE

**luv** · 10-28-2015, 02:05 PM

First rule should be that you cannot nominate yourself.

Just Passin' By · 10-28-2015, 02:06 PM

Keep the censorship as close to zero as possible, while upholding AC's rules
Keep the bannings as close to zero as possible, while upholding AC's rules

As long as that's happening, why should anyone give a shit who the mods are at any given time?

**Bearcat** · 10-28-2015, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone

We're all gonna need access to the mod lounge.

Besides the free booze, hookers, the Ban Wheel, there's really nothing to do in there.

Posted from Austin Chief's private jet

vailpass · 10-28-2015, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Well considering many of us have donated to keep the site up, server costs, etc... That pretty much gives those folks a voice in the matter.

I feel that mods spots should be up for renewal on yearly terms. Reason is simply the human element tends to get in the way of moderation after a period of time.

Some folks cant put there personal differences behind them when it comes to moderation. They abuse their rights and unfairly screw with other posters because of personal feelings.

Yearly terms should be voted on and new folks should have the opportunity to help police the site.

Otherwise we will revert to the Old star board levels or dear lord even the Orange mange...

Did you hit your head on the sidewalk really hard?

Eleazar · 10-28-2015, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

In what ways should we be more transparent?

I don't think transparency is a major problem, but maybe when someone is banned, a stated reason (what rule was violated) and who banned them might be good. This could help give people a clearer idea of where the lines are so they don't cross them, and show the rest of us that enforcement does occur. Showing that it's all above board might also lead to less "you poked the bear" moderation

**TimBone** · 10-28-2015, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Besides the free booze, hookers, the Ban Wheel, there's really nothing to do in there.

Posted from Austin Chief's private jet

See, I've got it stuck in my head that Kate Upton is shows up in there every couple of weeks to blow everyone. It's driving me nuts.

Lex Luthors · 10-28-2015, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Well considering many of us have donated to keep the site up, server costs, etc... That pretty much gives those folks a voice in the matter.

I make donations every month to Time Warner Cable, Kansas City Power & Light, and American Family Insurance. For some reason they still don't listen to me when I tell them how to run their businesses.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 10-28-2015, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

In what ways should we be more transparent?

I'm not saying do away with the mod lounge. You need somewhere to discuss without input from the peanut gallery.

But I'd start by asking that you publicly talk about actions being taken. Hell, make it a megathread. If you ban someone, say so, say why (post a link to the thread, if possible), and post the mod vote (is it even voted on, or is it one mod deciding action should be taken?). Say when that person will be reprieved.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 10-28-2015, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise

I don't think transparency is a major problem, but maybe when someone is banned, a stated reason (what rule was violated) and who banned them might be good. This could help give people a clearer idea of where the lines are so they don't cross them, and show the rest of us that enforcement does occur. Showing that it's all above board might also lead to less "you poked the bear" moderation

JMO, but there should be no such thing as "you poked the bear" moderation. Retaliation is not a reason for moderation.

10-28-2015, 04:21 AM
pr_capone THREEPEAT!!! Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NWMO Casino cash: $9948214	LNBS - The People's Mod... term limits? First and foremost... I want to express to Flop that this thread is not in any way shape or form meant to show disrespect or a lack of gratitude for the work done. Second... this thread is not created to express interest in being a moderator here. ----- Listening to a conversation tonight were people were talking politics (upcoming election and complaining about entrenched representatives) and it got me thinking to when Flop was voted in as the mod in 2011 and was dubbed "The People's Mod". I was wondering what you all thought about having a single mod position being an elected position for a term of 4 years. In my head: * Every 4 years a thread is created by an Admin asking for nominations for "The Peoples Mod". * People would nominate... then vote * The incumbent mod could very well be re-elected or a new one would take their place. What say you? /this thread is brought to you by insomnia
Posts: 19,897

10-28-2015, 02:05 PM	#82
luv You think you can get by this? Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Springfield, MO Casino cash: $-1170000	First rule should be that you cannot nominate yourself.
Posts: 63,558

10-28-2015, 02:06 PM	#83
Just Passin' By In Search of a Life Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $5450524	Keep the censorship as close to zero as possible, while upholding AC's rules Keep the bannings as close to zero as possible, while upholding AC's rules As long as that's happening, why should anyone give a shit who the mods are at any given time?
Posts: 69,748