****SNF: Steelers @ Bills GDT****

[eDave]

........
| CrackStreams | Wiz1 | NFLBite | BuffStreamz | NFLSportz | SportSurge | StreamsEast |
=======================================================

[RaidersOftheCellar]

Originally Posted by jerryaldini

Saints fans not feeling confident. And don't expect Brees to play.

https://saintsreport.com/threads/buz...s-gone.440346/

Interesting. A lot of them think their defense is overrated and has feasted on cupcakes.

They’re really freaking out over the loss to the Eagles.

[notorious]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Asked Ben Roethlisberger what was causing the underthrown balls, off-target passes -- if it was miscommunications with receivers, playcalls or something else:

"I'm just not very good, Brooke."

Well then.

— Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) December 14, 2020

Put Brooke and Rapes photos next to each and I challenge you to tell them apart.

[Hammock Parties]

Bills would be the one seed if they had beaten the Chiefs.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I've been reading stuff for a couple of weeks that made me think the Saints were skittish on him playing.

LaCanfora reported last night I think at halftime that they're in no hurry to bring him back and it doesn't sound like they expect him back even after the Chiefs game, let alone for the Chiefs game.

They'd be stupid to go with Brees, at this point Hill is much more dangerous

He's proven he can throw outside the numbers, and go downfield as well... throw in the running ability and he's a far more dynamic threat

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

They'd be stupid to go with Brees, at this point Hill is much more dangerous

He's proven he can throw outside the numbers, and go downfield as well... throw in the running ability and he's a far more dynamic threat

Hill's biggest issue is that as a running QB, he fumbles WAY too much. That's ultimately going to be his downfall.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Hill's biggest issue is that as a running QB, he fumbles WAY too much. That's ultimately going to be his downfall.

You mean like Lamar?

[O.city]

Hill can't throw.

It's never been easier to throw the football in teh NFL and some fans want these QB's that can run. Amazing to me.

If you can't throw the football consistently in the NFL you won't make it long . News at 10.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by staylor26

You mean like Lamar?

Hill is a bruiser compared to Lamar. He takes too many hits.

Hill is basically like a poor man's Josh Allen, when Allen was a rookie.

He COULD be dangerous but he won't be if he doesn't ever progress as a QB.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

Bills would be the one seed if they had beaten the Chiefs.

And?

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Hill is a bruiser compared to Lamar. He takes too many hits.

Hill is basically like a poor man's Josh Allen, when Allen was a rookie.

He COULD be dangerous but he won't be if he doesn't ever progress as a QB.

But it’s not about their running. It’s about what they lack as passers. That’s what makes them a bad matchup for teams that can score a lot of points.

[notorious]

Originally Posted by staylor26

But it’s not about their running. It’s about what they lack as passers. That’s what makes them a bad matchup for teams that can score a lot of points.

A QB from around 10 years ago resembles this description.........

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by staylor26

And?

Just interesting, that's all.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by staylor26

But it’s not about their running. It’s about what they lack as passers. That’s what makes them a bad matchup for teams that can score a lot of points.

Hill represents a different challenge for the Chiefs because he's a power runner with a finesse back. Lamar is a finesse runner with power runners behind him.

Hill showed some passing efficiency in his starts but he also hadn't played anybody of note and then lost yesterday to a bad team.

Hill's biggest problem is that his running CAN mask his passing deficiencies but to do that, you have to possess the ball. You can't fumble it away.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Hill represents a different challenge for the Chiefs because he's a power runner with a finesse back. Lamar is a finesse runner with power runners behind him.

Hill showed some passing efficiency in his starts but he also hadn't played anybody of note and then lost yesterday to a bad team.

Hill's biggest problem is that his running CAN mask his passing deficiencies but to do that, you have to possess the ball. You can't fumble it away.

I honestly don’t think it matters at all whether he’s a power runner or finesse. He’s still not a passer.

Just like with Lamar, if a team gets an early lead and he has to throw the ball, they’re ****ed.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by staylor26

I honestly don’t think it matters at all whether he’s a power runner or finesse. He’s still not a passer.

Just like with Lamar, if a team gets an early lead and he has to throw the ball, they’re ****ed.

Certainly, that's the case with any team that runs the ball a lot.

My concern is that the Saints pressure with 4. They're not like the Ravens. It may be harder to get a lead, which means it may be harder to get them out of their run game and force them to pass.

NO is a better team than Baltimore, that's the bottom line. Are they good enough? I doubt it but they're better than the Ravens.