|
![]() |
#91 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2075047
|
It's more of a size to speed ratio....not just tall guys who are fast.
|
Posts: 92,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
|
Oh, I agree with you. Whenever they talk they say they have a shared philosophy. I think we can both agree what that philosophy is in regards to cornerbacks. I suspect that philosophy is the same for WR, but not sure.
|
Posts: 2,174
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Casino cash: $10015467
|
Quote:
Yeah there doesn't seem to be a consistency unless Reid is telling him to pick up smaller speed guys. All the receivers we've picked up other than Hemmingway fit the little dood receiver profile. |
|
Posts: 2,641
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
There really is consistency in how they draft. Dorsey is a size-speed ratio guy for pretty much every position. Just look at our previous draft class and it's similar to what he has been a part of drafting before. Big guys who can move and run relatively fast, the smaller they are the faster they have to be. Of course that player has to have good production to go along with the speed/size, but Dorsey does make exceptions and is willing to take chances and a superior physical specimen (Fisher over Joeckel, Knile Davis over every RB that was left, Sanders Commings, small school Catapano, Travis Kelce and his character concerns, etc).
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Seems there's some pigeon holing going on with very little samples to hole the pigeon with.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Packers 1st picks spanning from 2005:
2005: Aaron Rodgers, QB, CAL: 6'2", 4.71 40 (2nd round pick was Nick Collins out of Bethune, he ran a 4.36 at 5'11" and 206 pounds) 2006: AJ Hawk, LB, Ohio State: 6'1", 248 pounds, 4.59 40 2007: Justin Harrell, DT, Tenn: 6'4.3", 300 pounds, 5.04 40 with a 1.67 10 yard split 2008: Jordy Nelson, WR, Kansas State: 6'2.5", 217 pounds, 4.51 40 with a 1.50 10 yard split 2009: BJ Raji, DT, Boston College: 6'1.4", 337 pounds, 5.12 40 with a 1.69 10 yard split. 2010: Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa: 6'5.3", 315 pounds, 5.20 40 with a 1.78 10-yard split (His 2nd round pick was a 6'3" DE who weighed 294 pounds and ran a 4.87 40 with a 1.60 10-yard split) 2011: Derek Sherrod, OT, Miss. State: 6'5.3", 321 pounds, 5.18 40 with a 1.81 10-yard split. (2nd round pick was Randall Cobb who we all know is an explosive play-maker) 2012: Nick Perry, OLB/DE, USC: 6'2.6", 271 pounds, 4.55 40 with a 1.51 10-yard split The majority of the Packers picks consisted of players that were similar to this. Our first draft class was consistent with this as well. I think it's safe to assume that, when it comes down to it, Dorsey actually does value height-speed-weight pretty highly when he is looking at prospects. |
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington
Casino cash: $3498243
|
|
Posts: 14,537
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington
Casino cash: $3498243
|
|
Posts: 14,537
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Quote:
Now that he is making the calls himself, judging from his first year selections, he hasn't deviated from the trend that GB had going. It's not shocking that every player he selected was among the most explosive and athletic at their given positions when they were on the board. Sanders was arguably the fastest FS prospect in that draft class. No other safety ran a 4.41 at that combine I think. Closest was Earl Wolff with a 4.42. Last edited by OldSchool; 02-27-2014 at 11:19 PM.. |
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington
Casino cash: $3498243
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 14,537
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Yeah, I'm hoping that too. I saw good things from Knile Davis, Catapano, Kush, and Fisher later in the year. The real wildcards are Kelce and Commings. The rest at least showed flashes and improvement in their rookie year.
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $8179900
|
Fisher ended up in the tub. That's not showing improvement later in the year.
|
Posts: 104,292
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
|
Quote:
There is an NFL Insider article (dont have access) talking about a size/speed formula. Someone else created a Height Adjusted Speed Score (HASS), but I havent seen the formula. This is the most detailed study I have found looking analyzing 816 wide receivers. in that study, the author used an Explosive Power ratio Quote:
Nice to look at, but dont think its all that accurate. |
||
Posts: 2,174
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Not sure if any of you guys have read this article or if it's Q but:
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 12,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|