|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Casino cash: $7231160
|
|
Posts: 1,529
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Casino cash: $-502950
|
|
Posts: 115,252
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Valiant 'The Thread Killer'
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kansas City
Casino cash: $4572380
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 18,550
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Nixonite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Arcadia, CA
Casino cash: $10006115
|
Derrick Johnson is one of the best 4-3 OLBs in football. He's far superior to Aaron Rodgers as a football player.
|
Posts: 1,054
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $1020478
|
The first statement is true. The second statement is false. The Chiefs would be in a much better position right now. Are you watching Rodgers? He looks great tonight against one of the league's best defenses.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 296,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Jersey
Casino cash: $2365958
|
Quote:
Rodgers has looked good and I'd probably rather have him than DJ, but one decent game against a poor pass defense doesn't mean all that much. |
|
Posts: 9,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Rockin' yer FACE OFF!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Casino cash: $765437
|
Heh. Allen was virtually non-existent against the Packers...I guess we might have gotten the better part of that deal after all...
__________________
![]() We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!! ![]() |
Posts: 27,177
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Casino cash: $10006091
|
Quote:
Even though D. Johnson has been a dissappointment so far I would say no to Rodgers. The Queeefs would of been forced to throw him into the fire too soon and would of ruined his developement. |
|
Posts: 2,583
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $324454
|
Bump....what the heck!
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 68,418
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $324454
|
Bump....
DJ sure looked good on that run defense today huh??
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 68,418
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $1020478
|
Rodger is 16/19 for GB today...
Of course under Herm he'd probably just break all his bones.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 296,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Will KC ever be better?
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks
Casino cash: $9905087
|
Seen this thread a number of times, but I've put off commenting.
I like DJ, but if I could have Aaron Rogers the way he's playing, and knowing how badly we could use a QB like him right now, I might be inclined to take him instead of DJ. However, who's to say had we taken Rogers that he'd be the QB he is today? Would he have gotten the coaching he needed to develope here? Would he have sit under and learn from one of the better QBs to ever play the game in KC? Would he have the OL and coaching staff here to allow him to play like he does in GB? I have to anser no to all those questions. Hindsight is easy, but we have to remember the variables that influence a players ability. I don't think Aaron Rogers would be the QB he is today if we had drafted him instead of GB. We have a good LB in DJ. With Aaron Rogers, we'd probably just have another QB we have already given up on.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 20,454
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
This mentality towards drafting QB's by both the Chiefs organization, their fans and the city is the main reason why the Chiefs haven't won a ****ing thing in 37 years. The Chiefs should be drafting a QB every year or at least, every other year. Instead, they've drafted four first day QB's in 25 years. That's why they suck and will continue to suck. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1555503
|
Quote:
I think DJ's average at worst. He has enormous upside but our terrible coaching is holding him back. His biggest problem by far is that he can't tackle. In 5 years, every one of Gun's defenses have sucked, sucked, sucked at tackling. We've never seen what he can do without Gun. I'd love to see what he can do without a Gun. DJ is actually a pretty outstanding coverage LB and I'm sick of Gun's LBs constantly overpursuing plays. Maybe I'm naive, but I think a different coordinator could get a lot more out of a talented player like DJ. |
|
Posts: 51,560
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Keep doubting J MFing Houston
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ft.lauderdale
Casino cash: $4018036
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 21,429
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|