Life McBeatdown - McDonald's Cashier Brutally Beats Rowdy Customers - Page 9

ChiefFripp · 10-15-2011, 12:31 PM

Two hoodrats got beat down by a fry jocky, did this happen on Martin Luther or Washington?

stevieray · 10-15-2011, 12:36 PM

criminals are victims and get the benefit of the doubt...yet a guy defending himself in close quarters is guilty.

doesn't get much more stupid than that...well, other than jumping a counter at mcd's and not expecting some sort of retaliation.

Chiefs Pantalones · 10-15-2011, 12:40 PM

If I were a smart man I'd think the proof that he's not turning his life around is that HE BEAT TWO WOMEN TO A PULP WITH A METAL ROD ON THE FLOOR OF A MCDONALDS!

Frazod · 10-15-2011, 12:49 PM

at the idiots defending these bitches.

jd1020 · 10-15-2011, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

at the idiots defending these bitches.

I don't think anyone is defending the bitches, assuming you are referring to the women and not all parties involved.

unothadeal · 10-15-2011, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

at the idiots defending these bitches.

I think everyone's in agreement that they got what they deserved.

ChiefFripp · 10-15-2011, 12:55 PM

I think if he would have bludgeoned them a few less times he would have not been charged. Couldn't he have just grabbed them and shook them? He didn't have to go full Ike on their behinds.

**Saul Good** · 10-15-2011, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefFripp

I think if he would have bludgeoned them a few less times he would have not been charged. Couldn't he have just grabbed them and shook them? He didn't have to go full Ike on their behinds.

She got back up, and he whacked her again. She could have had a gun. Should have stayed down.

**Bugeater** · 10-15-2011, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

She got back up, and he whacked her again. She could have had a gun. Should have stayed down.

Not to mention that the broads didn't seem to be backing off one bit even when they realized he had a weapon.

jd1020 · 10-15-2011, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefFripp

I think if he would have bludgeoned them a few less times he would have not been charged. Couldn't he have just grabbed them and shook them? He didn't have to go full Ike on their behinds.

He'd still be charged. He assaulted people with a deadly weapon. He would have a much better chance of it being thrown out if he didn't continue the assault. Even when the camera isn't pointed in the area you can tell he's still swinging by the reaction of the people around.

**Bugeater** · 10-15-2011, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

He'd still be charged. He assaulted people with a deadly weapon. He would have a much better chance of it being thrown out if he didn't continue the assault. Even when the camera isn't pointed in the area you can tell he's still swinging by the reaction of the people around.

And once again, you don't know what's really going on behind that counter. Just because they weren't standing doesn't mean they weren't fighting. They could have been kicking him or going for his legs or reaching into their pockets for weapons.

jd1020 · 10-15-2011, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

And once again, you don't know what's really going on behind that counter. Just because they weren't standing doesn't mean they weren't fighting. They could have been kicking him or going for his legs or reaching into their pockets for weapons.

If that was the case his co worker wouldnt have been trying to yank the pole out of his hands at the end and they wouldn't have been bending over to see if the women were ok.

**Bugeater** · 10-15-2011, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

If that was the case his co worker wouldnt have been trying to yank the pole out of his hands at the end and they wouldn't have been bending over to see if the women were ok.

The key words are "at the end", by that point he wasn't swinging any more. It looks to me like he's reacting to something they are doing throughout the whole ordeal, he isn't just mercilessly beating them.

WhiteWhale · 10-15-2011, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

And once again, you don't know what's really going on behind that counter. Just because they weren't standing doesn't mean they weren't fighting. They could have been kicking him or going for his legs or reaching into their pockets for weapons.

And he's going back to jail because you're wrong.

**Bugeater** · 10-15-2011, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

And he's going back to jail because you're wrong.

No, he's going back to jail because we've become a pussy-ass society that sees criminals as victims.

10-15-2011, 12:31 PM	#1
ChiefFripp Veteran Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: KC Casino cash: $10004900	Two hoodrats got beat down by a fry jocky, did this happen on Martin Luther or Washington?
Posts: 2,579

10-15-2011, 12:36 PM	#2
stevieray Most things I worry about… Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Under Pressure Casino cash: $-1174727	criminals are victims and get the benefit of the doubt...yet a guy defending himself in close quarters is guilty. doesn't get much more stupid than that...well, other than jumping a counter at mcd's and not expecting some sort of retaliation.
Posts: 74,032

10-15-2011, 12:40 PM	#3
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $6878717	If I were a smart man I'd think the proof that he's not turning his life around is that HE BEAT TWO WOMEN TO A PULP WITH A METAL ROD ON THE FLOOR OF A MCDONALDS! __________________ Don't be fooled by my username, I'm white.
Posts: 26,653

10-15-2011, 12:49 PM	#4
Frazod Did you hear what I said? Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $-636615	at the idiots defending these bitches.
Posts: 121,722

10-15-2011, 12:55 PM	#7
ChiefFripp Veteran Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: KC Casino cash: $10004900	I think if he would have bludgeoned them a few less times he would have not been charged. Couldn't he have just grabbed them and shook them? He didn't have to go full Ike on their behinds.
Posts: 2,579