Give Larry the ball damn it!!!!!!!!!!

crazychiefsfan · 10-16-2005, 03:43 PM

Comments

**QuikSsurfer** · 10-16-2005, 03:44 PM

Extra Point · 10-16-2005, 03:46 PM

Give the fans a balanced offense and tight-coverage defense, damn it!

Otter · 10-16-2005, 03:46 PM

miss the Eagles game did we?

Mecca · 10-16-2005, 03:46 PM

The Chiefs refuse to go with the "hot hand" idea for the RB. It would be so much smarter but I guess our coaches don't realize that. In todays game Larry was running better than Priest was.

crazychiefsfan · 10-16-2005, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter

miss the Eagles game did we?

So did Roaf

jynni · 10-16-2005, 03:48 PM

Quote:

In todays game Larry was running better than Priest was.

Perhaps we have found the answer to the RBBC solution. Let Larry run and Priest catch.

Hammock Parties · 10-16-2005, 03:48 PM

The Chiefs need to incorporate more power running into their gameplan when things go awry on the perimeter like they did today.

**cdcox** · 10-16-2005, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

The Chiefs refuse to go with the "hot hand" idea for the RB. It would be so much smarter but I guess our coaches don't realize that. In todays game Larry was running better than Priest was.

Johnson did look better running today. But Priest had two great runs in the redzone today and made two great plays on pass receptions. I'm not sure I'm ready to give those up, seeing as how we got the W.

Mecca · 10-16-2005, 03:52 PM

I'm just saying we'd be better off if they'd go to the hot hand theory of using the backs. Week 1 against the Jets Larry had the hot hand, against the Eagles it was Priest, today it was Larry. What's so hard about using the player who's running better?

Even if they are using Larry as the hot hand back Priest should get some time in the game in passing downs. He's shown numerous times he's the better reciever of the 2.

chief52 · 10-16-2005, 04:11 PM

While it can be argued how they are both used, the bottom line is both of them are getting carries. If the Chiefs can get to the playoffs it will be huge having two relatively fresh RBs compared to giving Priest all the carries. It is going to pay off in the long run.

**wazu** · 10-16-2005, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52

While it can be argued how they are both used, the bottom line is both of them are getting carries. If the Chiefs can get to the playoffs it will be huge having two relatively fresh RBs compared to giving Priest all the carries. It is going to pay off in the long run.

Unless one of them steps up, there won't be a long run.

Deberg_1990 · 10-16-2005, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52

While it can be argued how they are both used, the bottom line is both of them are getting carries. If the Chiefs can get to the playoffs it will be huge having two relatively fresh RBs compared to giving Priest all the carries. It is going to pay off in the long run.

Exactly, I think they are doing ok with the current technique. A well rested Priest in December and January is a good thing.

madshaw16 · 10-16-2005, 04:25 PM

Priest needs it in the red zone and on third and short, Larry can have it the other times.

4th and Long · 10-16-2005, 04:27 PM

Some of you still don't get it. What a shame. Here we sit with, arguably, the best tandem of running backs in the league and some of you STILL have the audacity to bitch about it. Pathetic.

10-16-2005, 03:43 PM
crazychiefsfan Lurker 4-life Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: St Joe Casino cash: $10004905	Give Larry the ball damn it!!!!!!!!!! Comments
Posts: 226

10-16-2005, 03:44 PM	#2
QuikSsurfer Got swag? Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Madison, MS Casino cash: $10008287	eh? __________________
Posts: 11,847

10-16-2005, 03:46 PM	#3
Extra Point MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Prairie Village, KS Casino cash: $10004900	Give the fans a balanced offense and tight-coverage defense, damn it! __________________ "Sometimes I sits and thinks, and sometimes I just sits." --Satchel Paige
Posts: 7,845

10-16-2005, 03:46 PM	#5
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2647050	The Chiefs refuse to go with the "hot hand" idea for the RB. It would be so much smarter but I guess our coaches don't realize that. In todays game Larry was running better than Priest was.
Posts: 110,818

10-16-2005, 03:48 PM	#8
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4740478	The Chiefs need to incorporate more power running into their gameplan when things go awry on the perimeter like they did today. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,715

10-16-2005, 03:52 PM	#10
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2647050	I'm just saying we'd be better off if they'd go to the hot hand theory of using the backs. Week 1 against the Jets Larry had the hot hand, against the Eagles it was Priest, today it was Larry. What's so hard about using the player who's running better? Even if they are using Larry as the hot hand back Priest should get some time in the game in passing downs. He's shown numerous times he's the better reciever of the 2.
Posts: 110,818

10-16-2005, 04:11 PM	#11
chief52 Veteran Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: NoCal Casino cash: $9855260	While it can be argued how they are both used, the bottom line is both of them are getting carries. If the Chiefs can get to the playoffs it will be huge having two relatively fresh RBs compared to giving Priest all the carries. It is going to pay off in the long run.
Posts: 3,123

10-16-2005, 04:25 PM	#14
madshaw16 Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Olathe Ks Casino cash: $10004900	Priest needs it in the red zone and on third and short, Larry can have it the other times.
Posts: 126

10-16-2005, 04:27 PM	#15
4th and Long Wheeeeee!!! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: In a house Casino cash: $9354925	Some of you still don't get it. What a shame. Here we sit with, arguably, the best tandem of running backs in the league and some of you STILL have the audacity to bitch about it. Pathetic. __________________
Posts: 19,775