Top DC Candidate

[The Bad Guy]

As I mentioned on this site days before any media last week, the top DC candidate for the Chiefs is going to be Monte Kiffin. He would also bring Rod Marinelli as his line coach.

I've been told it's his job to turn down and they think he wants it.

I think Kiffin has evolved some and doesn't run a straight Tampa 2 anymore, but and the personnel is an interesting fit.

Dorsey would be in huge consideration to be re-signed.

Hali, Dorsey, Poe, ?

Houston, ?, DJ - I think DJ would slide into the Derrick Brooks role.

I hated the hire at first, but I'm not completely against it now. I hate the Tampa 2 defense, but I think Kiffin recognizes he can't run that solely with the offenses of today.

Will be interesting. Just thought I'd share.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

At this time last year, IND's public stance was that they didn't know what they would do with the #1 overall pick.

Grigson wasn't hired until January 11th.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Why would he worry about declaring his intentions publicly when there's no one to fool? They DO hold the #1 overall selection.

Again, he opened that door, not me.

Because there's ALWAYS extenuating circumstances to account for.

I wasn't suggesting he was worried about other NFL teams.

But there's no reason to set fan expectation on the day he's hired, before he's done any homework on the situation.

[bricks]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You've reverted to your Pre-2009 form of being ****ing stupid.

Nowhere in this thread have I stated that the Chiefs shouldn't draft a QB with the number overall pick, nor have I stated that they shouldn't draft a QB.

Go **** yourself, Dumbass.

You're implying that they should draft a QB #1 overall IF that QB is a for sure Blue Chip prospect. A once in 15 year type of talent that comes out (i.e., John Elway and Andrew Luck).

That's a little unrealistic if you ask me. There comes a time where you gotta draw the gun. You don't seem like the guy that is a fan of being a gunslinger. You reek of conservatism. No offense. In other words, you don't want to see them make the pick unless it is a john Elway or Andrew luck type of talent. you don't want to see them take a QB for the sake of taking a qb, but then what about the risk factor involved that comes with drafting a QB?

provided that the QB isn't an Andrew Luck or John Elway but has the POTENTIAL to be good?! Or, could just as easily be a bust? You don't want to face that risk factor do you? Drafts are hit and miss dude. Thats the nature of it.

*Its the conservative approach that the fans are tired of and would like to see a change by taking risks. ESPECIALLY at QB position. It's the conservative approach to the position that has set us back for years. Thats where fans like TC are trying to get at. I understand him all along. Not trying to stick up for the dude but I get where he is going.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

But there's no reason to set fan expectation on the day he's hired, before he's done any homework on the situation.

Thank you

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by bricks

You're implying that they should draft a QB #1 overall IF that QB is a for sure Blue Chip prospect. A once in 15 year type of talent that comes out (i.e., John Elway and Andrew Luck).

That's a little unrealistic if you ask me. There comes a time where you gotta draw the gun. You don't seem like the guy that is a fan of being a gunslinger. You reek of conservatism. No offense. In other words, you don't want to see them make the pick unless it is a john Elway or Andrew luck type of talent. you don't want to see them take a QB for the sake of taking a qb, but then what about the risk factor involved that comes with drafting a QB?

provided that the QB isn't an Andrew Luck or John Elway but has the POTENTIAL to be good?! Or, could just as easily be a bust? You don't want to face that risk factor do you? Drafts are hit and miss dude. Thats the nature of it.

*Its the conservative approach that the fans are tired of and would like to see a change by taking risks. ESPECIALLY at QB position. It's the conservative approach to the position that has set us back for years. Thats where fans like TC are trying to get at. I understand him all along. Not trying to stick up for the dude but I get where he is going.

JFC.

What a bunch of bullshit. In the past 12 years, I've NEVER once stated the Chiefs shouldn't take a QB in the first round. They should have traded their entire ****ing draft for RGIII last year.

My reason for participating in this discussion is that as of today, January 7, 2013, NO QB has separated himself from the pack and as of today, Andy Reid didn't rule out waiting until next year to find a Franchise QB.

People that can't understand that are just plain ****ing stupid. But Bricks, you've ALWAYS been ****ing stupid and worthless, so I'm not surprised.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Thank you

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

What's so funny?

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

JFC.

What a bunch of bullshit. In the past 12 years, I've NEVER once stated the Chiefs shouldn't take a QB in the first round. They should have traded their entire ****ing draft for RGIII last year.

My reason for participating in this discussion is that as of today, January 7, 2013, NO QB has separated himself from the pack and as of today, Andy Reid didn't rule out waiting until next year to find a Franchise QB.

People that can't understand that are just plain ****ing stupid. But Bricks, you've ALWAYS been ****ing stupid and worthless, so I'm not surprised.

maybe he hasn't celebrated new years yet, I could understand it with everything THAT guy has had going on...
Posted via Mobile Device

[Chiefs Pantalones]

Somebody answer this...X team is gonna trade with us to draft X? Who is worth trading up to the #1 spot in this draft? You have to take a QB. You're stuck in that spot because there is no player that screams TRADE UP FOR HIM in this draft. So why not take the best available QB while we're there for the first time in our history?

[bricks]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

JFC.

What a bunch of bullshit. In the past 12 years, I've NEVER once stated the Chiefs shouldn't take a QB in the first round. They should have traded their entire ****ing draft for RGIII last year.

My reason for participating in this discussion is that as of today, January 7, 2013, NO QB has separated himself from the pack and as of today, Andy Reid didn't rule out waiting until next year to find a Franchise QB.

People that can't understand that are just plain ****ing stupid. But Bricks, you've ALWAYS been ****ing stupid and worthless, so I'm not surprised.

I refuse to acknowledge your opinion of me.

Dane, Im not accusing you of making such statements.

You didn't state it specifically that the Chiefs shouldn't draft a QB, but you definately implied it.

Dude, you're in denial. Bigtime. Go back and read your posts and if read in between the lines it spells out that they shouldn't draft a QB unless that QB is a blue chip.

You want the sure thing. Thats what you've been insisting all along.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

What's so funny?

You started this whole conversation telling everyone to "prepare" themselves for the Chiefs not taking a QB and end it with treating my statement like a concession because I won't put more weight on one of his statements over another.

We are right back where we started...

In 2 interviews, he said 2 different things.

So is he lying in one and not in the other?

Or is it all just bullshit? I still think it's the latter.

[SAUTO]

Lol. "I refuse to acknowledge your opinion of me"


If that doesn't sound like some counseling shit...
Posted via Mobile Device

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

You started this whole conversation telling everyone to "prepare" themselves for the Chiefs not taking a QB and end it with treating my statement like a concession because I won't put more weight on one of his statements over another.

We are right back where we started...

In 2 interviews, he said 2 different things.

So is he lying in one and not in the other?

Or is it all just bullshit? I still think it's the latter.

I'm actually not putting more weight into one over the other, I acknowledged the possibility, something in which some people aren't prepared to do.

I figured out some years that my opinion of the Chiefs and their moves doesn't mean jack shit. I wanted Ryan in 2008, Sanchez in 2009 (and said that Tyson Jackson was THE worst draft choice in Franchise history, and still stand by that) and would have traded the entire draft for RGIII.

The bottom line is that The Combines are six weeks away, yet some people have already targeted Geno Smith as the undisputed number overall choice.

That may be the case but it's far from a certainty today, despite the wants of some forum members.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Lol. "I refuse to acknowledge your opinion of me"


If that doesn't found like some counseling shit...
Posted via Mobile Device

I refuse to acknowledge my opinion of me

[milkman]

Another thread that I wish I had time to read through.

But, oh well.

**** Monte Kiffen.

I am becoming more disenchanted with the Reid hiring by the day.