Posnanski unloads both barrels on owners and Goodell

[Dave Lane]

http://joeposnanski.si.com/2011/04/2...the-last-drop/

Roger Goodell is clearly no schlemiel or schlimazel. Roger Goodell looks, as the cliché goes, right out of central casting. He’s a powerful looking guy, fills out a suit, gives every impression of being in charge at every moment of every day. If you were in a group stuck on an elevator with Roger Goodell, there is no question that he would be in charge, even if you had CEOs of companies and three-star generals in there. There are just people who exude authority, people who will walk down the street and people will just know that they are CEO of something or other. Goodell has that aura.

But, while watching this NFL labor mess, something has occurred to me, something that cuts completely against looks and aura and everything else. It has occurred to me that Roger Goodell might about 20,000 leagues over his head. It has occurred to me that while Bud Selig is destined to be underestimated because of the way he carries himself, that Roger Goodell is destined to be overestimated for exactly the same reason.

Here’s my thinking: The owners, under Goodell’s leadership, decided to go for broke as they try to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement. They did this at a time when the NFL is, by far, the most successful sports league in America, perhaps the world. They did this at a time when the league is a $9 billion entity, when television networks are sending flowers and chocolate, and when reports are coming out constantly about the horrible damage that football does to its players. Goodell, in representing the owners, had the gall to cry poor, to demand a billion more right off the top for the league’s billionaire owners, to say that the game could not possibly continue like this, to take money away from players who seem to be dying young and suffering terribly in their later years, and to actually demand expanding the season.

At this point, the feeling had to be that Goodell knew what he was doing. The NFL is on some kind of crazy winning streak when it comes to building the game — pro football just keeps getting bigger and bigger. Heck, the NFL DRAFT is now one of the biggest sporting events on the calendar. And that’s just a bunch of people in a room writing names on index cards. The league seems invulnerable to harm, and destined only to get richer and more popular and more powerful. On top of that, Goodell just embodies confidence and certainty. If the league officials figured that this was the time to take a bunch of money away from the players, hey, who could argue with their record?

Still, there were signs early on that things were not going as planned. In sports’ work stoppages, at least in my view, the majority of Americans automatically tend to side with the owners … or anyway they tend to side AGAINST the players. I think the reasons for this are involved and complicated and worthy of a 10,000-word post of their own. But generally people seem to get angrier at the players that they know than the silhouettes of the owners that they don’t.

But not in this case. Oh, sure, there were plenty who blamed the players, almost out of habit. More than usual, though, seemed to realize that the players were not really asking for anything. It was the owners shrieking that the system was irreparably broken, that they needed more money, that they needed to add games, that they were in big trouble. And when the players asked them to open the books and actually PROVE that they were in any sort of trouble at all, well, suddenly crickets chirped.

So I think many people blamed the owners for this whole fight. I know I did. I think the NFL owners already have by far the best deal in sports and are driven by pure greed to get more. Roger Goodell’s attempts to change this perception seemed to me pretty pathetic and unconvincing. He kept trying to call the attempt to add two games to the regular season a mere “reconfiguring” of the schedule (and he kept saying that the fans wanted it, though every poll suggested that the fans overwhelmingly did not). He kept talking in vague generalities about the financial doom that the league would face if they did not rework the CBA … and nobody really believed him. He sent what seemed to me an ill-conceived letter to the players association. He sent what seemed to me a ridiculous letter to the fans. And, as expected, he presided over a lockout of the players.

Right now, that lockout looks to be the most self-destructive move that a league has made in a long, long time. The lockout was enjoined by a judge on Monday, meaning it’s now over. The league is appealing Judge Nelson’s ruling, but from what I can tell the league’s appeal seems on shaky ground, and as our own Michael McCann says, the league now has a whole lot to worry about. The players, assuming the ruling is not overturned, now have serious negotiating power. The owners, assuming the ruling is not overturned, now have a serious problem convincing anyone that they aren’t already overflowing in money. This thing has a chance to become a major embarrassment for the owners … and perhaps more than just an embarrassment. It could be a financial catastrophe.

And based on Goodell’s opinion column in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, it looks like the impressive NFL commissioner is completely out of ideas. I wrote on Twitter that the only thing missing from this ludicrous column was exclamation points. You could tell right away that this column was untrustworthy when in the second sentence he wrote, “For six weeks, there has been a work stoppage,” as if that was caused by some sort of natural disaster and was not a result of the owners locking out the players. He then talks about how great the NFL system has been for everyone without even taking one sentence to mention the inconvenient fact that it was the owners, not the players, who wanted to blow up the old system in a bald money grab. He then offers an utterly unrealistic and devious doomsday scenario “if the players win” — a scenario that he knows will never happen and is only in play now because of the owners’ greedy lockout that was slammed down by the courts.

It all screamed of desperation and, frankly, it felt a bit incompetent, too. If Bud Selig ever wrote a column like that, people would be pulling out their torches and pitchforks. Roger Goodell is undoubtedly a brilliant guy, and he has a strong history with the league, and he is trying to represent a group of very different owners who probably resent that they have to give ANY of their money to the players. But that’s the job of commissioner, and right now it looks like Goodell is flailing.

Of course, maybe he isn’t. Maybe he has expected everything that has happened and has contingency plans that are not easily seen now. Maybe everything is going exactly according to plan. I have mentioned that I am reading Robert Caro’s Master of the Senate about Lyndon Johnson, and the amazing thing about LBJ as Senator was how he manipulated people without them knowing it, how sometimes he wanted bills he supported to fail, and how sometimes he wanted people he differed with on his side, and how he had a clear plan that he did not want anyone to see until it was too late.

Maybe Goodell is like that, too. That is certainly the reputation he has built in many quarters. I am beginning to think, though, that reputation is way, way off. Bud Selig is clearly much more effective and authoritative than he lets on. I can’t help but wonder if Roger Goodell is exactly the opposite.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by jAZ

Exactly. Owner + Lawyers - Court Loss = Goodell-The-Scapegoat

I actually think Goodell has been outstanding as a commissioner.

Yeah, he's been great, as lackeys go.

[DJ's left nut]

I think he's been no better than a mediocre commissioner, but not exactly for the reasons involved here.

I think shit like the 'helmet to helmet' crap is his. As are the inconsistent player conduct rules, etc...

But this lockout isn't his doing. If I had to pick an 'architect' I'd look to Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder.

[Simplex3]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Rather the latter is a BS back-peddling attempt to spin your way clear of the former and anyone that reads it knows better.

But again - feel free to continue defending your idiocy.

You keep looking for white knights and I'll keep believing people are motivated by their own self interest.

[Simplex3]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Ok so how about the voluminous blog he puts out simply because he likes to write apparently? Saying Pos would have left the Star for $1 more, when he clearly stayed there for a long time as better offers were poring in, is just flat out wrong. The Star has made it obvious they can't pay for legit sports columnist any more with the sinking of the newspaper industry. What was he supposed to do, stay there for what Mellinger makes when SI probably offered 5x that or more?

Seriously, of all the public figures in the world to attack as being a money-grubbing whore - you may have picked just about the least likely candidate. Congrats, that wins some kind of stupid hall of fame award.

I completely underestimated the amount of man love there is for Posnanski. Had I known I wouldn't have called your kid ugly and had to deal with all these emotional arguments.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Simplex3

I completely underestimated the amount of man love there is for Posnanski. Had I known I wouldn't have called your kid ugly and had to deal with all these emotional arguments.

Or perhaps you should've considered not saying something ignorant and you wouldn't have to deal with people calling it as such.

It's funny to watch someone say something shockingly stupid then get all ass-hurt when others call them out for it.

It's okay sweetheart, you're right. We're all just picking on you for making a completely rational, reasoned point.

[vailpass]

JoPo is a soft bitch, always has been.

[Simplex3]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Or perhaps you should've considered not saying something ignorant and you wouldn't have to deal with people calling it as such.

It's funny to watch someone say something shockingly stupid then get all ass-hurt when others call them out for it.

It's okay sweetheart, you're right. We're all just picking on you for making a completely rational, reasoned point.

Arguing with you about someone you clearly care about at some level isn't worth it. Every one of your posts has contained a personal attack. As such, I'm not going to bother.

[gblowfish]

Joe Poz is one of the greatest sportswriters to ever grace the pages of the KC Star. He is universally revered by professional sports journalists, he has won multiple prestige awards for his writing, he is now one of the big boys, writing for SI, and he is the pulse of the Kansas City Sports fan. He is, in short. one of us, and beyond reproach. He does not push his own agenda or make himself the story (like Fatlock) and he continues to call KC his home. The guy is aces, and a damn fine writer.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by cdcox

If we've lost Posnanski, we've lost America. /Owners.

[Demonpenz]

Simplex3 is projecting his attitude in others. He showed his hand in one of luv's threads.

[Skyy God]

Originally Posted by vailpass

JoPo is a soft bitch, always has been.

Not a real man like you, eh?

[jAZ]

Originally Posted by Brock

Yeah, he's been great, as lackeys go.

He's done a lot of things right. If he's done it as a lackey, then his overloards have done a lot of things right.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by jAZ

He's done a lot of things right. If he's done it as a lackey, then his overloards have done a lot of things right.

I especially like his watergate-like evidence destruction skills.

[Skyy God]

Well played, indeed.

http://deadspin.com/#!5796864/roger-...ent-of-silence

[notorious]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

If I had to pick an 'architect' I'd look to Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder.

This x 11tybillion.