The D Line and the O-Line both suck

Deberg_1990 · 09-17-2006, 06:12 PM

0 sacks and little pressure on Plummer today. The O-line is in shambles. We cant be a playoff team until those areas are fixed. It wont happen this year.

It all starts in the trenches.

ROYC75 · 09-17-2006, 06:12 PM

BINGO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 06:13 PM

I was really, really disappointed in Hali. Foster is an average RT in this league. I expected more.

JBucc · 09-17-2006, 06:15 PM

Sampson looked so much better than Black. But yeah the D-line was terrible at pressuring Plunger. I kept expecting Allen to get a sack, but, nothing. I guess part of that has to do with quick passes but St. Louis didn't exactly have trouble with it.

Deberg_1990 · 09-17-2006, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I was really, really disappointed in Hali. Foster is an average RT in this league. I expected more.

Yea, but hes a rookie give him some time......

Its sad becasuse Plummer is just a train wreck waiting to happen and we got ZERO pressure on him today. He hit some big throws to keep drives alive because he had a nice pocket to settle in to.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 06:18 PM

are you guys kidding?

Huard took one sack today...

Plummer took zero...

wanna know why?! Neither of them held the ball for more than 1 ****ing second.

The D-Line played very well today.

Frankie · 09-17-2006, 06:18 PM

I must have watched a different game from you guys. I thought both lines exceeded expectations. Not spectacular, but they sure didn't "suck." Both lines played way better than last year IN DENVER.

Deberg_1990 · 09-17-2006, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

The D-Line played very well today.

Yes, they did for them. But they played about as well as they can play. They are NOT a playoff D-line. We simply need more talent there.

CupidStunt · 09-17-2006, 06:20 PM

We need a franchise left tackle; Wiegmann is getting long in the tooth; Shields is really a shell of his former self (though that's more than we could expect from some rookie); and we need a stud defensive tackle.

DE- Hali
DT- Reed
DT- Alan Branch
DE- Allen
OLB- Fox (did he get a single snap today?)
MLB- Mitchell
OLB- Johnson
CB- Law
FS- Page
SS- Knight (until Pollard beats him out, which we can't assume is a given at this point)
CB- Surtain

I like that lineup.

runnercyclist · 09-17-2006, 06:20 PM

I wouldnt say they sucked either. The OL played admirably considering and the DL played the run OK. When Jake the Mistake needed time he certainly had it.

htismaqe · 09-17-2006, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I was really, really disappointed in Hali. Foster is an average RT in this league. I expected more.

What?

Hali was all over the field. He was one of the biggest reasons we held their running game in check for the 1st time EVER.

Deberg_1990 · 09-17-2006, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by runnercyclist

I wouldnt say they sucked either. The OL played admirably considering and the DL played the run OK. When Jake the Mistake needed time he certainly had it.

The O-line looked better because we ran short slant routes and crossing patterns. Nothing deep that would have required them to hold a block. The were also aided quite a bit by the extra TE's being in there.

ROYC75 · 09-17-2006, 06:24 PM

I saw no sacks by our D, matter a fact if Allen wasn't in there on 2 hurries, 2 deflections and a couple of other players, our DL was under performing for a pass rush.

Our run D was adequent, we did allow a couple of big gains, but when we need the D to step up again, in OT, we didn't have it.

BTW, has anybody seen Hicks on the field at all in the last 2 games, if so, I have missed him in there.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 06:26 PM

lj4mvp is a friggin' moron.

After watching the game Wesley played today, you keep him out of the starting lineup!? Good idea.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 06:27 PM

and don't you think we all ****ing know we need a "franchise" LT...those don't exactly grow on trees.

09-17-2006, 06:12 PM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $3914454	The D Line and the O-Line both suck 0 sacks and little pressure on Plummer today. The O-line is in shambles. We cant be a playoff team until those areas are fixed. It wont happen this year. It all starts in the trenches.
Posts: 66,914

09-17-2006, 06:12 PM	#2
ROYC75 Time For Your Wake Up Call !!! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Barn Yard Casino cash: $5773900	BINGO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! __________________ Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it. John Lennon
Posts: 36,970

09-17-2006, 06:13 PM	#3
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4800478	I was really, really disappointed in Hali. Foster is an average RT in this league. I expected more. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,500

09-17-2006, 06:15 PM	#4
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	Sampson looked so much better than Black. But yeah the D-line was terrible at pressuring Plunger. I kept expecting Allen to get a sack, but, nothing. I guess part of that has to do with quick passes but St. Louis didn't exactly have trouble with it. Last edited by JBucc; 09-17-2006 at 06:59 PM..
Posts: 12,016

09-17-2006, 06:18 PM	#6
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	are you guys kidding? Huard took one sack today... Plummer took zero... wanna know why?! Neither of them held the ball for more than 1 ****ing second. The D-Line played very well today.
Posts: 56,356

09-17-2006, 06:18 PM	#7
Frankie Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	I must have watched a different game from you guys. I thought both lines exceeded expectations. Not spectacular, but they sure didn't "suck." Both lines played way better than last year IN DENVER.
Posts: 26,959

09-17-2006, 06:20 PM	#9
CupidStunt offense > defense Join Date: Jul 2005 Casino cash: $2613332	We need a franchise left tackle; Wiegmann is getting long in the tooth; Shields is really a shell of his former self (though that's more than we could expect from some rookie); and we need a stud defensive tackle. DE- Hali DT- Reed DT- Alan Branch DE- Allen OLB- Fox (did he get a single snap today?) MLB- Mitchell OLB- Johnson CB- Law FS- Page SS- Knight (until Pollard beats him out, which we can't assume is a given at this point) CB- Surtain I like that lineup.
Posts: 8,901

09-17-2006, 06:20 PM	#10
runnercyclist Gone to Carolina Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: By lake Wylie in tega cay Casino cash: $10006038	I wouldnt say they sucked either. The OL played admirably considering and the DL played the run OK. When Jake the Mistake needed time he certainly had it.
Posts: 2,759

09-17-2006, 06:24 PM	#13
ROYC75 Time For Your Wake Up Call !!! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Barn Yard Casino cash: $5773900	I saw no sacks by our D, matter a fact if Allen wasn't in there on 2 hurries, 2 deflections and a couple of other players, our DL was under performing for a pass rush. Our run D was adequent, we did allow a couple of big gains, but when we need the D to step up again, in OT, we didn't have it. BTW, has anybody seen Hicks on the field at all in the last 2 games, if so, I have missed him in there. __________________ Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it. John Lennon
Posts: 36,970

09-17-2006, 06:26 PM	#14
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	lj4mvp is a friggin' moron. After watching the game Wesley played today, you keep him out of the starting lineup!? Good idea.
Posts: 56,356

09-17-2006, 06:27 PM	#15
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	and don't you think we all ****ing know we need a "franchise" LT...those don't exactly grow on trees.
Posts: 56,356