Football clady's deal is done - Page 8

**SAUTO** · 07-14-2013, 06:42 PM

5 year 57.5 33 guaranteed
Posted via Mobile Device

**DaneMcCloud** · 07-14-2013, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

See above in bold.

Clady has never missed a game, and that is with blowing out one knee playing basketball in the offseason. He's been the LT for 4 different QBs--Cutler, Orton, Tebow and now Manning.

He's pretty darn good.

If the Broncos had put him on the block for a 2nd rounder this offseason, he'd be with another team.

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Clady has had the luxury of playing on a good team his entire career. If you switched the two around, there would be little to no difference between them.

you have no clue what Clady does to go all pro

every ****ing Branden Albert thread brings out the homers at CP without fail. it's god damn clockwork

-King- · 07-15-2013, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

you have no clue what Clady does to go all pro

What exactly does he do different from Albert? Its not pass protect because he's allowed more sacks than Albert the past 3 years. Cant be run blocking.

You really think its a coincidence that his two best years came when Cutler and Manning were QBs? When has Albert ever had the luxury of playing with a QB even half as good as those two?
Posted via Mobile Device

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:07 AM

Would like to see Albert slide inside to LG. That is where he should play especially for 8 mil a year.
We already have our RT on the squad in Schwartz or one of the others.

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

What exactly does he do different from Albert? Its not pass protect because he's allowed more sacks than Albert the past 3 years. Cant be run blocking.

You really think its a coincidence that his two best years came when Cutler and Manning were QBs? When has Albert ever had the luxury of playing with a QB even half as good as those two?
Posted via Mobile Device

techniques that are taught at the collegiate level numbskull. if you know what you are looking for (eg sports writers that vote all pro do) then it is quite obvious Clady has mastered techniques that BA has not. I and others have gone through this with you "BA is god" folks over & over & over and you just don't ****ing get it. so why even bother. I shall laugh heartily at the idiocy. carry on.

**Saul Good** · 07-15-2013, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Who gives a ****?

Matthew Stafford threw for nearly 5,000 yards on a 4-12 team.

Stats are stats: They don't tell the whole story.

Dane is awesome. He criticizes posters for citing stats to defend positions...then turns right around and points to the teams's overall record as if to suggest that bad teams don't have any good players.

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 06:13 AM

uh, winning is everything?

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

techniques that are taught at the collegiate level numbskull. if you know what you are looking for (eg sports writers that vote all pro do) then it is quite obvious Clady has mastered techniques that BA has not. I and others have gone through this with you "BA is god" folks over & over & over and you just don't ****ing get it. so why even bother. I shall laugh heartily at the idiocy. carry on.

What matters most technique or results?

Larry Bird sure didn't have the best technique. He looked like shit on a Basketball floor but that dude was one of the best. But I suppose you would have rather had a player that had the proper technique.

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

uh, winning is everything?

so results are what matter?

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

so results are what matter?

wtf is your point now. an ugly win is still a win -- see the ravens 2001 championship, but they weren't talented enough to sustain a run like say, the 2002 patriots. dilfer was a good QB, but compared with brady... and it ain't athleticism at play there -- it is technique spawned by what's between the ears.

I venture to claim BA's shortcomings at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears and Clady's success at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears. when the mind orchestrates technique, the body follows & memorizes. that's how it works on advanced levels.

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

What matters most technique or results?

Larry Bird sure didn't have the best technique. He looked like shit on a Basketball floor but that dude was one of the best. But I suppose you would have rather had a player that had the proper technique.

and tiger woods !!!11! gtfo with your basketball analogies

Ace Gunner · 07-15-2013, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Would like to see Albert slide inside to LG. That is where he should play especially for 8 mil a year.
We already have our RT on the squad in Schwartz or one of the others.

yep we could bring back sackintosh to play RT and still be ****ing brutality OL with LT Fish -- LG BA -- C Hudson -- RG ASShanded2ya

but it'll never happen. it would be too hard on Branden's ego.

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

wtf is your point now. an ugly win is still a win -- see the ravens 2001 championship, but they weren't talented enough to sustain a run like say, the 2002 patriots. dilfer was a good QB, but compared with brady... and it ain't athleticism at play there -- it is technique spawned by what's between the ears.

I venture to claim BA's shortcomings at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears and Clady's success at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears. when the mind orchestrates technique, the body follows & memorizes. that's how it works on advanced levels.

I was just pointing out that people that have consistently won without technique have shown that they can consistently without having the best technique therefore the technique argument is not 100% valid.

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

and tiger woods !!!11! gtfo with your basketball analogies

Tiger Woods is all technique. Jim Fuyrk not so much

Chief Roundup · 07-15-2013, 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

wtf is your point now. an ugly win is still a win -- see the ravens 2001 championship, but they weren't talented enough to sustain a run like say, the 2002 patriots. dilfer was a good QB, but compared with brady... and it ain't athleticism at play there -- it is technique spawned by what's between the ears.

I venture to claim BA's shortcomings at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears and Clady's success at LT is mostly caused by what's between the ears. when the mind orchestrates technique, the body follows & memorizes. that's how it works on advanced levels.

It is called muscle memory and good or bad technique uses it. That is the reason it is so hard to change or overcome those old habits.

07-14-2013, 06:42 PM
SAUTO Shit Join Date: Jun 2008 Casino cash: $10039067	clady's deal is done 5 year 57.5 33 guaranteed Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 55,715

07-15-2013, 06:07 AM	#109
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $2111627	Would like to see Albert slide inside to LG. That is where he should play especially for 8 mil a year. We already have our RT on the squad in Schwartz or one of the others. __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,195

07-15-2013, 06:13 AM	#112
Ace Gunner First Overall Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: kcmo Casino cash: $10007271	uh, winning is everything? __________________ The Greatest
Posts: 10,580