NFL Draft Ryan Tannehill - Page 7

jspchief · 10-20-2011, 08:53 AM

I'll be closely watching him through the rest of the NCAA season. I expect him to end up a 1st round prospect, and more likely to be available in the range where KC will be picking.

He seems to have good pocket presence, throws well on the move, has a live arm, and plays smart. He's looking good. I'm not sure he's the QB I'm championing just yet, but he's on my radar and has already passed the likes of Foles and and Jones in my book.

Curious to hear what others think of him. Who's seen a lot of him? What are his downsides IYO?

Discuss.

**RealSNR** · 12-17-2011, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44229318

Palko threw for more touchdowns and had a higher completion % playing against better competition. I can recall he played very good against Baltimore, moved the ball against St.Louis, and threw a touchdown in the Green Bay game.

That's more than just rhetoric but it's all your one trick pony ass brings to the table.

You apparently don't remember the Tampa and Baltimore games, do you?

Stanzi was getting raped from all sides playing with the THIRD STRING offensive line, not the second string like Palko had. Stanzi was hit, sacked, and forced to escape the pocket to evade the pressure on nearly every ****ing play.

When he DID get some action with the 2nd string at the end of the Green Bay game, he stood calmly in the pocket, was very cerebral in his reads and ACCURATELY (that's a key word there) delivered the ball.

You're a ****ing idiot if you think Palko's preseason was better than Stanzi's.

Titty Meat · 12-17-2011, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

You apparently don't remember the Tampa and Baltimore games, do you?

Stanzi was getting raped from all sides playing with the THIRD STRING offensive line, not the second string like Palko had. Stanzi was hit, sacked, and forced to escape the pocket to evade the pressure on nearly every ****ing play.

When he DID get some action with the 2nd string at the end of the Green Bay game, he stood calmly in the pocket, was very cerebral in his reads and ACCURATELY (that's a key word there) delivered the ball.

You're a ****ing idiot if you think Palko's preseason was better than Stanzi's.

This coming from the guy who thinks Stazi is a future starter. Your opinion isn't bias at all. Ricky Stanzi didn't even play in the game vs Green Bay. There goes that argument.

I recall Stanzi getting clobbered yes and I recall Palko getting clobbered as well. However Palko moved the ball well in 3 of the games.

**RealSNR** · 12-17-2011, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

This coming from the guy who thinks Stazi is a future starter. Your opinion isn't bias at all. Ricky Stanzi didn't even play in the game vs Green Bay. There goes that argument.

I recall Stanzi getting clobbered yes and I recall Palko getting clobbered as well. However Palko moved the ball well in 3 of the games.

St. Louis. What the **** ever.

You think if Stanzi started two games this year he would generate 0 offensive TD scoring drives and be responsible for 8 turnovers? That's pretty much what you're saying.

Titty Meat · 12-17-2011, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

St. Louis. What the **** ever.

You think if Stanzi started two games this year he would generate 0 offensive TD scoring drives and be responsible for 8 turnovers? That's pretty much what you're saying.

Stanzi played well against St.Louis so did Palko. Palko moved the ball and played great against Baltimore it solidified his spot as a backup IMO.

Nope that's not what I'm saying at all. I even said Stanzi should get a chance to start. What I'm saying is it's not a conspiracy that Palko was ahead of Stanzi on the depth chart like JD and Milkman are suggesting.

milkman · 12-17-2011, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44229318

Palko threw for more touchdowns and had a higher completion % playing against better competition. I can recall he played very good against Baltimore, moved the ball against St.Louis, and threw a touchdown in the Green Bay game.

That's more than just rhetoric but it's all your one trick pony ass brings to the table.

The only chance that Stanzi had with the second team usit in the preseason came against the Rams, and I'll take those stats, and his play in that game over anything Palko did in the preseason.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2011/8...iefs-preseason

**RealSNR** · 12-17-2011, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Stanzi played well against St.Louis so did Palko. Palko moved the ball and played great against Baltimore it solidified his spot as a backup IMO.

Nope that's not what I'm saying at all. I even said Stanzi should get a chance to start. What I'm saying is it's not a conspiracy that Palko was ahead of Stanzi on the depth chart like JD and Milkman are suggesting.

I've said this a thousand times. It's not so much a conspiracy that Stanzi was under Palko, but a method. Stanzi was a 5th round rookie. Haley/Parcells/Patriot Way protocol says his ass goes on the bench and it stays on the bench. That's exactly what happened with Tom Brady during his rookie year.

Stanzi could have gone 20/20 with a billion yards and 20 TDs in the preseason and it wouldn't have mattered. He was going to sit on the bench this year. He was predestined to it for this season.

Also, your argument that Palko did great against Baltimore, which is why he deserved the 2nd string spot is pretty shaky. Palko was still playing with many #1 guys when he took over the game. Stanzi was left with the worst offensive line I've ever seen play in an NFL game (our 2nd/3rd/4th stringers) and fartdiarrhea for receivers.

milkman · 12-17-2011, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Palko also had the most attempts of anyone in preseason and threw for less average yards than Stanzi.

6 yards per attempt.

Dinked and dunked his way top the back up job.

I didn't get a chance to see that Green Bay game, but I', betting that one TD came late in the game against the scrubs the Pack were cutting.

jd1020 · 12-17-2011, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Stanzi played well against St.Louis so did Palko. Palko moved the ball and played great against Baltimore it solidified his spot as a backup IMO.

Nope that's not what I'm saying at all. I even said Stanzi should get a chance to start. What I'm saying is it's not a conspiracy that Palko was ahead of Stanzi on the depth chart like JD and Milkman are suggesting.

I never said it was a conspiracy.

Palko started for 2 reasons...

1) He was Haley's guy.
2) Haley hated Pioli.

It's no coincidence that Palko is practically removed from the team and is now behind Stanzi, a guy who has never taken a snap in the regular season, immediately after Haley was fired.

milkman · 12-17-2011, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

I've said this a thousand times. It's not so much a conspiracy that Stanzi was under Palko, but a method. Stanzi was a 5th round rookie. Haley/Parcells/Patriot Way protocol says his ass goes on the bench and it stays on the bench. That's exactly what happened with Tom Brady during his rookie year.

Stanzi could have gone 20/20 with a billion yards and 20 TDs in the preseason and it wouldn't have mattered. He was going to sit on the bench this year. He was predestined to it for this season.

Also, your argument that Palko did great against Baltimore, which is why he deserved the 2nd string spot is pretty shaky. Palko was still playing with many #1 guys when he took over the game. Stanzi was left with the worst offensive line I've ever seen play in an NFL game (our 2nd/3rd/4th stringers) and fartdiarrhea for receivers.

Can't remember.

Was it against the Ravens that Stanzi was under extreme pressure, with the entire D-Line busting through, he broke contain and got an underhand flip to Battle(?) that turne into a reasonable gain?

Stanzi also made throws that neither Cassel and certainly not Palko could make that were dropped by his receivers.

Titty Meat · 12-17-2011, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

6 yards per attempt.

Dinked and dunked his way top the back up job.

I didn't get a chance to see that Green Bay game, but I', betting that one TD came late in the game against the scrubs the Pack were cutting.

It was in the 2nd QTR.

jd1020 · 12-17-2011, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Stanzi could have gone 20/20 with a billion yards and 20 TDs in the preseason and it wouldn't have mattered. He was going to sit on the bench this year. He was predestined to it for this season.

He would have started if he went 50/50.

veist · 12-17-2011, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

6 yards per attempt.

Dinked and dunked his way top the back up job.

I didn't get a chance to see that Green Bay game, but I', betting that one TD came late in the game against the scrubs the Pack were cutting.

Palko looked terribad in the GB game, I was watching it with my GB fan friend and all we could both talk about was how terrible Palko looked playing with 1s against mostly 3s and 4s -- well, that and what a dumbass Mark Castle was for getting himself hurt and that play was on him. The lack of talent they were playing against was most obvious when the Packers had Josh Gordy going against Bowe and Bowe pretty much was open on every play. If the offense had been "throw it to Bowe" Palko probably could've gone 20/20 with 4 TDs.

milkman · 12-17-2011, 04:26 PM

Ricky Stanzi and Iowa must have ass raped the Cornhuskers at some point during Stanzi's career there.

Titty Meat · 12-17-2011, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Ricky Stanzi and Iowa must have ass raped the Cornhuskers at some point during Stanzi's career there.

Iowa hasn't beaten Nebraska since I've been alive. What's that have to do with anything though? Palko played better in the preseason than Stanzi it's the truth. Ricky Stanzi is nothing more than Curtis Painter it's so annoying coming on here constantly hearing about his mediocre ass. He wasn't even a great college QB.

milkman · 12-17-2011, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Iowa hasn't beaten Nebraska since I've been alive. What's that have to do with anything though? Palko played better in the preseason than Stanzi it's the truth. Ricky Stanzi is nothing more than Curtis Painter it's so annoying coming on here constantly hearing about his mediocre ass. He wasn't even a great college QB.

You're the only dumbass arguing that Palko played better than Stanzi in the preseason.

Anyone with eyes saw that your "truth" is absolute bullshit.

And, again, I'm not arguing that Stanzi is the future.

I am only arguing that you are a ****ing moron.

10-20-2011, 08:53 AM
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Ryan Tannehill I'll be closely watching him through the rest of the NCAA season. I expect him to end up a 1st round prospect, and more likely to be available in the range where KC will be picking. He seems to have good pocket presence, throws well on the move, has a live arm, and plays smart. He's looking good. I'm not sure he's the QB I'm championing just yet, but he's on my radar and has already passed the likes of Foles and and Jones in my book. Curious to hear what others think of him. Who's seen a lot of him? What are his downsides IYO? Discuss.
Posts: 27,207

12-17-2011, 04:26 PM	#103
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	Ricky Stanzi and Iowa must have ass raped the Cornhuskers at some point during Stanzi's career there. __________________
Posts: 70,769