Chiefs Rams hold the key to Chiefs trade-down.

Frankie · 04-20-2010, 01:48 PM

IMO.

Do you guys think there's a chance St Louis will not pick Bradford at 1? If they don't, our 5th position becomes very valuable to teams like Cleveland, Seattle and San Fran. The latter two have two firsts each.

I would not mind seeing those three in a Bradford sweepstake competing for our 5. Possibly even the Jax.

If this has already been discussed, I have not seen it. So there!

CupidStunt · 04-20-2010, 01:54 PM

We'd be wise to take a very good deal and not push for an epic deal. Teams won't fear the Seahawks taking Bradford IMO. Certainly worth a roll of the dice.

Coogs · 04-20-2010, 01:55 PM

They were discussing this last night on Total Access. One of them suggested that if Bradford lasted until 5, that the Chiefs should just turn in the card, and forget dealing for more draft picks.

Deberg_1990 · 04-20-2010, 01:57 PM

The Rams are taking Bradford...thread over.

**Rain Man** · 04-20-2010, 01:59 PM

TAKE THE FREAKING QUARTERBACK!

Ahem. (Cough, cough. Smoothing down suit.) In that scenario, I would support drafting the quarterback.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-20-2010, 02:01 PM

Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down.

Enough of this ****ing madness.

**DeezNutz** · 04-20-2010, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down.

Enough of this ****ing madness.

Many Chiefs fans understand QB play about as well as many Royals fans understand SS play.

Sure-Oz · 04-20-2010, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down.

Enough of this ****ing madness.

Saccopoo · 04-20-2010, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down.

Enough of this ****ing madness.

For this offense, I don't know what Manning would give you over Cassel. Cassel has better mobility, a little better size and while not as accurate, he's got about the same arm strength.

Plus, Manning, for all the accolades, has only one Super Bowl victory. Trent Dilfer has one SB victory.

Sure-Oz · 04-20-2010, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Many Chiefs fans understand QB play about as well as many Royals fans understand SS play.

Speak for yourself, betancourt has a cannon!

**DeezNutz** · 04-20-2010, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

For this offense, I don't know what Manning would give you over Cassel. Cassel has better mobility, a little better size and while not as accurate, he's got about the same arm strength.

Plus, Manning, for all the accolades, has only one Super Bowl victory. Trent Dilfer has one SB victory.

I had to quote this.

That is all.

Archie Bunker · 04-20-2010, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

For this offense, I don't know what Manning would give you over Cassel. Cassel has better mobility, a little better size and while not as accurate, he's got about the same arm strength.

Plus, Manning, for all the accolades, has only one Super Bowl victory. Trent Dilfer has one SB victory.

Good lord

rambleonthruthefog · 04-20-2010, 02:15 PM

if bradfords available its a no brainer. we take him.

would tampa take bradford? would washington? how much money do they really have tied up in freeman or mcnabb long term? does either team think they have their QBOF? also, the rams are taking bradford.

Mecca · 04-20-2010, 02:15 PM

Please, someone just kill Sacc, that or ban him.

CaliforniaChief · 04-20-2010, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

For this offense, I don't know what Manning would give you over Cassel. Cassel has better mobility, a little better size and while not as accurate, he's got about the same arm strength.

Plus, Manning, for all the accolades, has only one Super Bowl victory. Trent Dilfer has one SB victory.

We see you've been enjoying 420 day!!!!!

04-20-2010, 01:48 PM
Frankie Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	Rams hold the key to Chiefs trade-down. IMO. Do you guys think there's a chance St Louis will not pick Bradford at 1? If they don't, our 5th position becomes very valuable to teams like Cleveland, Seattle and San Fran. The latter two have two firsts each. I would not mind seeing those three in a Bradford sweepstake competing for our 5. Possibly even the Jax. If this has already been discussed, I have not seen it. So there!
Posts: 26,959

04-20-2010, 01:54 PM	#2
CupidStunt offense > defense Join Date: Jul 2005 Casino cash: $2553332	We'd be wise to take a very good deal and not push for an epic deal. Teams won't fear the Seahawks taking Bradford IMO. Certainly worth a roll of the dice.
Posts: 8,904

04-20-2010, 01:55 PM	#3
Coogs In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northern Kansas Casino cash: $1634349	They were discussing this last night on Total Access. One of them suggested that if Bradford lasted until 5, that the Chiefs should just turn in the card, and forget dealing for more draft picks.
Posts: 21,607

04-20-2010, 01:57 PM	#4
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $3914454	The Rams are taking Bradford...thread over.
Posts: 66,914

04-20-2010, 01:59 PM	#5
Rain Man NFL's #1 Ermines Fan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $3348491 VARSITY	TAKE THE FREAKING QUARTERBACK! Ahem. (Cough, cough. Smoothing down suit.) In that scenario, I would support drafting the quarterback. __________________ I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit.
Posts: 141,260

04-20-2010, 02:01 PM	#6
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down. Enough of this ****ing madness. __________________
Posts: 23,212

04-20-2010, 02:15 PM	#13
rambleonthruthefog Veteran Join Date: May 2008 Location: Austin, Texas Casino cash: $5655026	if bradfords available its a no brainer. we take him. would tampa take bradford? would washington? how much money do they really have tied up in freeman or mcnabb long term? does either team think they have their QBOF? also, the rams are taking bradford.
Posts: 1,401

04-20-2010, 02:15 PM	#14
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2647050	Please, someone just kill Sacc, that or ban him.
Posts: 110,817